CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: May I kindly interrupt?
 
  Views: 3,348
Published: 17 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,009,534

Re: May I kindly interrupt?


This is a fantastic post and is well deserved of a "BSA". Round of Applause.

I would firstly like to comment that I feel all this has all come about because of my post to Shroom with regards to his E-coli comment. I admit I was extremely upset when I answered his post but at the time I felt the need to make my feelings clear.

You make many great points and I hope people DO take the time out for consideration.


----

“Perhaps it'd be a good idea for you and for anyone interested to follow 'the entire string of posts' completely prior to making firm comments on the issue. A first thought.”

- Goes without saying really. How can one be aware of what's really being said otherwise. Very good point Apxr/Doc.


----

"Where you make the point about information being provided that resulted "wrong or off track without knowing any better about it yourself, you may have acted irresponsibly particularly for exposing other people "that don't know any better" to it, IF you didn't care to state firmly beyond any doubt where your limitations lie in that regard."

- A highlight for concern here. Can be the difference between right/wrong, good/bad, life/death!

----

“This is not a role-play Forum. We're dealing with Real people and REAL problems here. It's no secret that I like Shroom's enthusiasm and drive when trying to understand these things -I've said so before-, but the lack of respect he continues to display for science is inexcusable, in my opinion, which is why I'm forced to answer back now.”

Very well put Apxr. ROLE play and REAL life, two VERY different things. This is not a game. NOR is it a competition.

----


“Neither of you should imagine -it seems-, the amount of work, logic, techniques and deep-thinking that went into process to accomplish these humble Micrographic results in question and from which these posts result. All that process is a process backed entirely by proven knowledge, and on many occasions by 'a sense' of academy. To disrespect this in any way could be an insult to intelligence itself and to the efforts of the rhrplus.com team whomever they are, I think.”

- The micrographs are A WORK OF ART.

----


“Even worse, it'd be a blemish on Men from the past, BETTER Men, men that painstakingly and unconditionally willed to dedicate their entire lives to the relentless purpose of understanding these processes more for all of us to apply and to enjoy for generations to come. On many occasions those men payed 'the ultimate price' for their work through horrible infested deaths, in fact infested by the very subjects of their study.

They were better Men, better prepared, entirely humble, unassuming and very respectful of those that came before them and of others at work in the most humble of practices. They knew what they were up against, and they knew too well that this is no laughing matter or a subject that just anyone with a scope can delve into. With utter disregard for all of this, both of you seem to feel -for some reason- apt enough academically speaking to push forward into the field with a hint of expertise [Once more, I'm putting you into the equation as a 'loose variable' by mere association].”

I loved the way you put this. Beautiful.

----

Who wants to LEARN from BAD SCIENCE!

Solid principles = knowledge,

----


Sometimes we need steering and guidance. And who better to give it to us - APXR/DOC!

RESPECT TO APXR/DOC.

70428.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.313 sec, (2)