Re: news letter, by MH

Dr. Christopher gives most of the credit to his teacher Dr. Shook and I am sure Dr. Shook was handed down his wisdom that he passed onward, etc...Eacy author just tells the similar stories over with their own personal twist.

I was forever changed when I paid over $300.00 for Dr. Hans Neiper's duplicated papers that fit in a simple envelope and at first I thaught wow, did I ever get ripped off; but the one statement that made his writings worth $300.00 was that he stated as fact, all good health information has been written prior to 1900. I believe the same to be fact. Back in the days prior to radio waves, electricity of any kind was when humans were extremely intellagent and thus closer to God.

Anything I can write is nothing but repeated information that leaves out many important details that the original author explained much better. I do better to tease the student into wanting to read books that I have enjoyed of which I have well over 12 converted to computer now and hope to have them available in the schooling by the end of this year. I have teased people about many of these books since the beginning of this forum. BOOK I will set anyone free of medical for life, if they will only apply what the author teaches. Future books improves upon what BOOK I teaches.

I do have allot of interest in recording the Amish healers history even though I know he lacks wisdom using Nature in many cases, but he makes up for it with basics. His problem was he consorted with too many M.D.s and wanted to be like them and he believes too much in vitamins and some drugs and even operations, but it is his basics that I wish to record the most, because he is an extremely well qualified teacher in it.

I have very little to write and don't pretend to have ever created anything new of value, I believe it was all known prior to 1900. Even the iodine problems were well known prior to 1900 and I have no clue if anyone ever believed the tree source Iodine was the answer. Even If I make a great tree based Iodine, it was still well known it could be done prior to 1900 and like all things, the odds are its just rehashing somehting that has been long forgotton.

So the reasonable person will spend time on the time tested formulas and not waste a lifetime trying to create an original.

With our helper, I think most of the good books have been recorded to computer, I am not sure if she did the rare parasite book as mentioned in the news letter, if so it would be a nightmare to copy because of the hundreds of drawings of worms, so if I do that book for the school I am not sure if we will spend all the time to convert the pictures. My theroy is we have enough books, we would do better to learn the ones already out there.

What I have on the web site and this forum is more than enough.

You have to keep in mine, everything I have ever written has no scientific backing. I believe what I believe in the present and that is always subject to change as I learn.

Even though I liked Dr. Hulda Clark and I like David Christopher and I like the Amish healer, they all three have one thing in common, THEY don't change.... you can give them undenyable evidence that something they are doing is wrong and they may even admit it, but because they have wrote what they have wrote, they stick to what they have written and refuse to correct the problems. Why, I don't know. I believe every book written should be revised by the author for as long as that author is alive.

MH

MH

Tweet