I have not read the book, but it looks like a good one from what the review has to tell.

“Skeptics are going to say these are unproven cures, but unproven at least is not disproven as are the treatments offered cancer patients today.”

Absolutely spot on as you would say, my friend.

As most of us here are well aware, there are many, many different ways that nature and alternative therapies are often successful while mainstream medicine is stuck in a barbaric dark ages system of harshly cutting out, burning our or poisoning out symptoms and leaving undrlying causes and prevention largely undressed.

A great many books are out there which provide broad surveys of the many different natural and alternative treatments, - some books list over 350 different ones.  And there are also some pretty comprehensive "alternative guides" which suggest  various of the treatments for various kinds of cancers. Perhaps this one does both - as it clearly had a questions and ansswers feature.

Without having read it, I will make  a couple of observations about many cancer books in general and about this one in particular.:

First,  books that are broad surveys tend to leave the reader confused as to what is best to choose from all the overload of information.  Often that can lead to choosing too little, something not appropriate to their own cancer and body, and often it can lead to choosing too many elements, many of which may be at cross purposes with one another.

It is the equivalent of listing every food believed to have healthy benefits and leaving it up to the reader to put a diet plan together that best achieves their desired effects - such as loses weight, lowers bad cholesterol, raises good cholesterol, boosts immunity and wards off illness.  Such a list is very good and valuable information, to be sure, but most people are looking for a good plan they can follow without designing their own cookbook and spending hours and hours each week making out diet plans.

Secondly, the books that advise specific treatments for specific cancers may advise a treatment that has been successful for a particular kind of cancer in some people, so far as they know, but not for other cancers.  No two people and no two cancers are identical, in my opinion.  And I believe that the best protocols are ones that are successful for a broad range of cancers.  Although a certain type of cancer, or a cancer which appears in a certain part of the body, may be the observable symptom, the underlying causes may just as easily have resulted in other types of cancer and cancer in other locations - and might do so in the future if the underlying causes of all cancers are not addressed fully. 

I believe that a great many people need and are looking for an anti-cancer protocol that is fairly simple, relatively easy to follow, affordable and which addresses all of the known and greatly suspected causes and characteristics of cancerm in a safe, highly effective way that will ,A) get rid of cancer if it present B)  prevent cancer from ever returning or appearing and C) have all the protocol elements work together in harmoney with no component counter-acting or over-duplicating another.

(And THAT is a preview of what I am working on and researching)

My final observation:

While I agree that someone who incoporates nature and the proper supplementation, cleansing and lifestyle shoucl be able to rest easiier and keep cancer at bay, I would say that we should nevertheless fear cancer to the point of making sure that maintain our plan and not lower our guard.

If I lived next door to a vicious killer and I had a security fence, electronic surveilance, guard dogs and body guards, as well as a loaded .357, I would feel safer - but I would still fear the SOB!

Thanks for the post, Chris.  I fully intend to purchase the book and read it when time permits.  Until then, consider many of my comments "IMHO".

DQ (Tony Isaacs)