I know much can be said for using juice and I would certainly not argue that point.
I would be careful however, to not discourage fasters from using Fuhrman's method which is very gentle and conservative. Whoever made the statement that "breaking a fast using fruit can be dangerous and lead to death", really needs to take a few steps back and qualify that statement with some facts. Imho, generalizations like that are dangerous and do more harm than good.
Few if any complications are reported when using Fuhrman's method of using only high-water content fruits, and he also states that one should "eat slowly and chew the food very well", which will also aid in a smooth digestive transition. He is an IHAP colleague of Goldhamer and Lisle (the latter being from True North, the website and fasting clinic you are referring to at healthpromoting.com), and Fuhrman has fasted that many if not more at his clinic in New Jersey, and additionally, he uses juices as well.
Fuhrman fasted 46 days at Shelton's clinic and that method (breaking on high-water content fruits, oranges specifically) was Shelton's method. It was one of Shelton's associates, Dr. Virginia Vetrano, who noted that "animals in the wild have no juicers or blenders and therefore have to break their fasts naturally on whole foods, why should man be an exception?" (Cute example). But she further reasoned that the "bulk in the food is necessary to promote both peristalsis and mixing contractions in the stomach and intestines. Bulk is necessary to promote secretion of the digestive juices of the stomach and intestines. The bulk of the food touching the stomach and intestinal walls is the stimulus for muscular contractions as well as for digestive secretions. Because of this, solid food is digested and handled more efficiently than juices. It is held in the stomach and intestines long enough for proper digestion and absorption, whereas juices, lacking this bulk are hurried along the digestive tract. Lacking in bulk, juices do not occasion strong peristaltic waves and do not elicit the gastrocolic reflex as strongly as solid foods. Because of these facts, when the fast is broken on juices, the first bowel movement after a fast is delayed". Vetrano goes on to talk about the loss of nutrients in juices by oxidation "no matter how carefully nor how quickly the juice is prepared". She also notes the "psychological and physiological necessity of chewing food", and she points out the advantage of breaking the fast with solids in that the "faster does not become bloated and over-filled with fluids and the bulk taken in solid food prevents overeating and the post faster is more satisfied with his meals". (quotes taken from "
Fasting Can Save Your Life " by
Herbert Shelton ).
Whether or not breaking with juices over whole fruit is (currently) considered a superior or safer method, I really don't know the answer to that. I'm just relating what I have read in Fuhrman and
Shelton and their findings have proven true in my own experiences. Though I have also used juice a couple of times during the first 2 days of breaking, generally when whole fruit was not easily available - like at work, when I forgot to bring my orange slices.
Have you read 'The Pleasure Trap' by Lisle and Goldhamer, you know, the guys who run the True North Health Center referred to at healthpromoting.com? It's a wonderful book and it gives such a thorough investigation into the origins and characteristics of the MAD, and how it is the root cause of all the major chronic diseases (much like Fuhrman does in his book, 'Fasting and Eating for Health'), but in the 'Pleasure Trap', they really delve into the evolutionary biology involved with diet and diseases.
Best to you Bob, interesting questions raised here.
Sky