I have followed her protocol for 7 years and I am healthier now than at the age of 25. I am not much worried about the fact that she has changed her mind regarding the steel cookware. She is a researcher and she is honest. If later in her work she finds she was wrong about a certain aspect, she openly mentions this. But the key principles of her therapy and health concept remain unchaged. By the way, she allowed metal cookware not because inorganic metals proved to be less toxic, but because in late 90-ss she found a way to neutrailize heavy metal ions by magnetic field (zappicator). I think you just missed the connection.
Regarding the donations... Have you ever tried to run a clinic on donations? My friend did in Europe... Sad story. All costs money. Clark deserves to be paid for her work. She is a brilliant scientist. Strange that you do not question how much is spent on chemo, radiation and other toxic protocols that may extend life but hardly ever enhance health. People lose all their savings on FDA-approved therapies even though insurance should cover it all... and then end up dying of toxicity and nobody here is blaming FDA.

I feel that your post is a good one as it is good to question and you are right to point out conflicts and contradictions.

>- 1) Why would a naturopathic doctor not know that carbohydrates are assimilated easier without proteins

While this idea is promoted by many and I do agree to a limited extent, I feel that many proponents of this are overboard in their ferver. It should be considered that in many cases where something may produce negative results, there may be other cases where positive results may be produced from the same combination. What I am saying is that something may be true 95 percent of the time is not always true.

>- Lard

I agree, that this is something that I would not normally want to eat but perhaps there is a quality in the fats that may be beneficial to those with certain illnesses in limited quantity.

>- Drinking milk is also known to be of little benefit for your body, doing more harm that good

This is again, a matter of opinion as milk does have definite benefits. Just look at the size difference between the people in countries that do not drink milk and those who do. There are other benefits associated with drinking cows milk such as reduced infant mortality. While some may not care to look and see the benefits, they are there.

>- Am I to understand that my nutritional level from such foods is going to be zero?

There are many areas around the world where the food is cooked to h-ll and back and I do not see them dying of malnutrition unless they fail to cook well enough to avoid parasites. I agree that heat destroys many important enzymes and antioxidants but I have seen many vegetarians, juicers, etc with serious parasite problems and no, proper pH does not cure all ills and some parasites are perfectly capable of surviving in alkaline conditions.

>- 2) Mrs Clark first stated that stainless steel cookware is unhealthy.

She has good reason to think so. Stainless is iron alloyed with a number of minerals, 2 of which may be Nickel and Chromium. Both are classified as serious tissue irritants and can leach from stainless alloys. It really depends which of the hundred or so different alloys of stainless steel is used to make that pot. The wrong stainless can be dangerous.

>- later we can read about Mrs Clark’s new rediscovery that stainless steel is ok

Perhaps this pot was made from a different alloy of stainless.

>- 3)She says it is occasionally acceptable to use Teflon. However it is known that Teflon is a toxic material

Yes, Teflon is toxic but so is aluminum, some plastics, some stainless, some ceramics, and even some glass products may be more dangerous than thought.

>- How can we also know the consequences of the electronic zapper machine that might occur years from now? It has a direct contact with the body. Can you trust the electronic experiments that have been used on a limited number of people for a short time?

Zappers have been in use for almost 20 years now. As I am the only author of a book about zappers and zapping in particular (that I know of), I will submit that not all is known and this is the fault of the FDA. As long as they keep suppressing the industry, they will never be able to collect valid information.

As a producer of zappers for 6 years, I have continually tried to collect valid and accurate information on the effects of zapping, both positive and negative. All the FDA can think of doing is to try entrapment, harassment, and intimidation.

I do know for the fact that the FDA has only ever had 1 serious incident report in the last 20 years with an estimated 1 million zappers in use. One person did not read the instructions properly and used it with a pacemaker (which had to be replaced).

I have compiled actual reasonable statistics on some of the conditions that receive positive reports and also on some of the problems (generally rare and very minor) associated with using zappers .

Also, people who read my book know that the zapper electrodes should never come in direct contact with the body.

See: Zapper information

4)In many of her book pages she mentions using plastic containers.

Not all plastics leach but she admittedly does not spend as much time as I would hope discussing the pros and cons of things such as plastics, glass, ceramics, stainless, etc.

>- She shouldn’t charge money but operate on donations.

I would say on the basis of your claims that standard cancer clinics and hospitals should set the standard and do this first as they charge far more than she does and then desert their patients when they run out of money. These same patients who often do not improve from their platinum based poisons often end up on the doorsteps of Dr. Clark's clinic or others. There are far better treatments for cancer but these are ignored because they do not produce enough income.

The hospitals were happy to have my wife spend $5000 to $10000 a week on radiation, etc. Clinics were not ashamed to charge us as much as $8000 a week excluding medication which ran as much $11,000 a month. Honestly, I did not see any medication that worked any better than zapping, Essiac tea, high dosage vitamin and mineral supplementation.

For those who want to donate to cancer research see: //www.curezone.org/forums/m.asp?f=254&i=6306#i and do not support the American Cancer Society //www.curezone.org/forums/m.asp?f=254&i=6292#i .