My dear rainy9, I'm not accusing you of anything as such, and I most certainly did read your post. I'm more than happy to acknowledge that you accept the efficacy, sufficiency and finality of Jesus' sacrifice on the Cross, and that the restoration of the OT cultus of animal sacrifices would represent a retrograde step that flouts a fundamental principle of Scriptural hermeneutics - namely, that of progressive revelation.

Having said that, you must surely be aware that most of your bed-fellows (ie temple restorationists) do indeed espouse precisely such calamitous doctrines as the restoration of the Levitical Preisthood and its necessary concomitant - animal sacrifices. See 3:00 - 3:24 of this by way of illustration of the fact:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIoBxrza7SU

It's a real shame therefore that you still cling to the false notion of a literal 3rd temple, which more or less places you in the same camp as those with whom you disagree over some important details. You may have jettisoned the sacrifices, but your belief that a physical temple will be rebuilt still represents a restoration of the shadow after the substance has already been revealed to us in the person of the Messiah (Col. 2:16-17). In that sense, you are still sitting on the fence somewhat.

As a possible antidote to your literalistic take on the subject, may I recommend to you the writings of Charles D Alexander, especially his 'broadsheet' on this very subject:

http://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=22433

As for Kim Clement, he also said in that same 'prophecy': 

And God says, "Even a greater move of the Spirit shall take place and your enemies will finally be subdued by the year 2009."

Hmm..........last time I checked, Putin was still sabre-rattling and winning in Syria, Afghanistan is virtually back under Taliban control, Iraq and Libya are basket cases with Pakistan not that far behind, Kim Jong Un was still threatening a 'merciless' attack against you, China still has you by the short & curlies in the financial realm [and quite possibly in cyberspace as well], and there's still a very long line of jihadists who are hell-bent on destroying 'the great babylon'. So no, I don't think so. 

And Kat Kerr? Her MO is very strongly reminiscent of that employed by spiritists. If that works for you, fine. Personally, I prefer to err on the side of caution and heed the warnings of Mt. 7:22-23, 24:4-5 and IICor. 11:12-15.