Enthesitis12
1. Dvjorge is right, you can't identify candida cannot just be identified by the naked eye. You need a microscope, pcr testing, culturing. But it is likely to be candida as it is one of the few dimorphic yeast. For instance you dont see in any of the reports, "candida identified by the naked eye" the first one was identified by a "culture" and the second one was idenfitifed by "Grocott stains."
Then again, candida can be SEEN by the naked eye, once you identify it of course, as when the culture it on plates they can be clearly seen. I'm sure this is what dvjorge means.
2. I have seen numerous posts to where it is indeed dead epithial tissue which I have no doubt contains some kind of microbial in it causing it to act that way. It's not entirely candida as in a culture
3. Most importantly Dr. Jeff while I appreciate you trying to help people, please STOP USING MORE THEN ONE ACCOUNT TO PROMOTE YOUR PRODUCT. Its unethical, and its amusing that you need more then one account to defend yourself. I personally think your prices are lucrative at the expense of the suffer, but I'm a finance major. I understand finances and the amount of advice you give for free and everything else that comes along with the territory of going to school to be a naturopathic doctor and what not. But promoting it in an unethical way is just not right. I am also a man of ethics. If your plan works good enough, people will promote it themselves. I have pretty good proof truthorconsequences is you as I have some screen shot that shows you answering of Dr. Jeff to where your post is now deleted. Don't know if its you or a secretary orsomething like jorge has said, but its not right.
Jorge don't let these people try to put you down in presenting quality research to people.