Hello, #126989
You have a good point, there, extending to many fields.
1_ Both devices, Bob Beck’s blood purifier, and
Hulda Clark ’s zapper aims to the same goal : Clean the place “in vivo”, with tiny, direct currents.
1a_ Bob Beck used an interesting “alternate current” with a very low frequency : around 4Hz, and quite high voltage : 3x 9V= 27V, and with very small electrodes. Concentration of current is high, brief, and changing polarity often enough to cancel bad electrolysis issues.
At this frequency, the body (mainly the skin), has plenty of time to recover from electric aggression, and when next polarity arrives, body reaction STARTS again.
Body sees no change of polarity. Only a “new aggression”.
By this stratagem, nervous system feels around 8 signal/aggressions per second (Schumann frequency, with a very sweet, peaceful effect) and electrolysis phenomenon is keep to a bare minimum. Quite clever.
1b_ Huda Clark, following other paths, end up using direct current too, with much lower voltage : 1x 9V, and higher frequencies, to overcome the impedance of the capacitive skin barrier, all with careful “positive offset” (all DC)
In her original design, current at point of contact is around 3 to 4mA peak. With the 0.87” Diameter copper tubes, 4 to 5” long, area of contact is around 10 square inches, and concentration of current s much lower (0.15mA to 0.20mA average per square inch).
Usual wrist bands concentrates current well enough to seriously tickle and sometimes cause small burns. Same remark with Terminator’s kind of zapper.
With the 7-20 sequence, chances to have detrimental electrolysis is minimal.
With continuous zapping and higher currents (Super Stabilized wave forms) over 20 to 30mn long, skin starts to react badly.
If you forget your zapper during sleep, anything can happen …
For higher current and/or time exposition, a health professional, knowing what is going on is recommended (hard to find).
2_ Both, Beck and Clark, uses metallic electrodes with 1 or 2 layers of non-metallic wet, conductive fabric to avoid metal migration, something hard to do with Terminator’s style of zappers.
Nothing to fear for metallic migration, unless you use bare metal in contact with skin.
Note : Silver is considered by many as a heavy metal, as detrimental as mercury.
Only
Colloidal Silver seems to have good impact on health.
If you stay on the designed limits and recommendations of Bob Beck and
Hulda Clark , you have not much to fear.
***********************************
If pushed by commercial instinct, you, as a manufacturer, applies the “Biggerrr is Betterrrr” and, as a “customer”, lessens to your magnificent, misleading publicity, you should never forget that YOU, as an adult applying a non approved technology on yourself, and by yourself, are FULLY response-able for what could happen, whatever the law could say or apply.
***********************************
=> “Yum yum, copper toxicity anyone??”
I have some comments about customers having bad, high concentration of heavy metals, and being VERY sensitive to electricity, electromagnetism, AND COPPER.
If they use a zapper with minimum current (3 to 5 layers of wet kitchen towel, no salt added, and / or low voltage zappers, as the MZ5b), and take care of their heavy metal toxicity with other ways of detox, use of the zapper seems to decrease sensitivity to more comfortable levels on many of them.
For “normal”, more healthier users, benefits of zapping seems to overcome widely any other side effect. And a healthier immune system, with functional liver and kidneys, will take care of any copper income, passing through the heavy, efficient filter of wet kitchen towel.
=> “NOTE: These issues are more of an issue when using high voltages or low frequencies. More power is NOT ALWAYS BETTER!!! ParaZapper has been screaming that for ages and everyone seems to ignore it.”
I fully agree with this very important comment.
Just enough, no more.