"You need to keep in mind that AIDS is not a disease. It is a syndrome, which are a group of symptoms. So even common illnesses can lead to an AIDS diagnosis even in the absence of HIV infeciton. For example the diagnostics were changed years ago to include multiple bouts of pneumonia or chronic yeast infections. These can easily be addressed without the commonly prescribed immune suppressing drugs often given to AIDS patients. Apparently your friend was one of the lucky ones who did not receive these drugs."

My friend had HIV infection which grew into AIDS.  She received/gets the full blown allopathic medications which have improved dramatically in the past 10 - 12 years.  She is alive because of them where alternative/naturopathic failed miserably. 

ROTFMAO!!! That is a pretty bold statement considering the fact that there is no standard way of detecting the virus in the human body. The only way this can be done is with an electron microscope. And even with this it is extremely costly and time consuming since it is like searching for a needle in a haystack.

I cover the fallacy of HIV testing in these posts:

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1545495#i

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1545497#i

By the way HIV CANNOT cause any disease in man. In fact under the original definition of AIDS HIV cannot even cause AIDS. The definition of AIDS was changed to fit the HIV virus after Gallo, who was already busted once for scientific fraud lied to the world by claiming HIV was the cause of AIDS. Since he was one of the US governments top scientists he was going to once again embarrass the government. So to prevent this the definition of AIDS was expanded to include the drop in CD4 counts since this is the ONLY thing HIV can do. And this DOES NOT collapse the immune system. Why did Gallo lie AGAIN? For financial reasons. He held the patent rights on the HIV antibody test. As long as he could convince the world f his lie he was making a fortune.

 My friend had HIV infection which grew into AIDS.  She received/gets the full blown allopathic medications which have improved dramatically in the past 10 - 12 years.  She is alive because of them where alternative/naturopathic failed miserably. 

I forgot to add earlier that you may also want to look up the Concorde Study, which was the largest study ever done on the effects of AZT on AIDS patients. The study found that the drug dramatically shortened the life of AIDS patients. Of course this was no big surprise being that that the failed chemo drug AZT was banned for human use back in the 60s because it was found that its side effects were so deadly. When AIDS was introduced the drug was reintroduced to recoup the money the drug companies had lost. The deadly side effects come from the fact that AZT can do what HIV cannot do, which is to wipe out the immune system leading to an AIDS diagnosis.

 IF you've followed my posts on this thread you will see that I believe the number one alternative therapy for AIDS is urine therapy. 

So which cause of AIDS does urine therapy address? And how does it address that cause?

and the most important factor was that her T-cell count was headed toward 100.  The T-cell count is a critical factor in tracking. 

ROTFLMAO!!!! That is total garbage. The CD4 counts don't mean that much.  We use to have "AIDS" patients all the time with zero CD4 counts that were otherwise perfectly healthy. Why? Because the CD4 cells DO NOT govern the immune system. Other immune cells can operate and support the immune system in the absence of CD4s. This is why the ONLY known virus that can cause AIDS under the ORIGINAL definition (before it was expanded to cover Gallo's lie that HIV was the cause of AIDS) is human herpes virus type 6 variant A (HHV6-A). Unlike HIV, which cannot collapse the immune system, HHV6-A collapses the immune system by destroying CD4, NK and B cells.