Karma means you don't get away with anything, bravo Webmaster.
I'll second that!
It seems to me that what we are witnessing is a repeat of a brilliant person (with some hang-ups - but then WHO´s perfect? - or wants to be?) being most effectively silenced. Wilhelm Reich and Charlie Chaplin come to mind.
Making a comparison to Wihelm Reich is ludicrous. The difference is that Wilhelm Reich actually knew what he was taking about. He was not making up his own fictitious science as he went along. And Wilhelm Reich worked to prove his invention and concepts with real research instead of saying just do it or you are against God. So to compare the two is really an insult to the name of Wilhelm Reich!
Private forums are a privilege that is extended by the Webmaster, and that privilege can be withdrawn at the WM's discretion as well. They are not actually "owned" and at any rate should not, in my opinion anyway, be used to develop a cult following. Having a private forum does not endow the so-called owner with a private kingdom in which they can disregard TOS rules that apply for all of CureZone, including private forums. Nor should they, in my opinion anyway, be used to turns others away from most of the rest of this site.
Specifically, such forums do not give anyone a license to abuse other CureZone members with name calling, sexist remarks, publishing private information about members, re-wording or editing their posts to change their meaning, engaging in personal attacks against others after you have banned them and they are unable to reply, and a host of other abuses.
You did this to yourself the same as Charlie did in the Ask Charlie and other forums. Some of us tried to warn you, but apparently you listen only to your own advice and demons. I personally thought Maya came to your forum, as Invincible, and offered you some wonderful advice on how to change your ways so that your controversial actions did not overshadow your message of healing and continue to offend other members.
Perhaps now would be a good time to take a timeout so that you can reflect on the words of Maya and others, address those demons that seem to drive you to unneccesary controversy, and then perhaps return after what may be merely a timeout.
Best regards,
DQ
You are right, the monetary greed and shysterism from Charlie does not apply to ML. Unfortunately, some of the other abuses do. I am not condemning ML so much as offering constructive criticism and in no way am I advocating a permanent banishment - and I will point out that I have long stayed out of the fray when it comes to ML and those who have taken umbrage at his actions. One reason is that I think it not appropriate for private forum owners to get into altercations with one another. Another is that I do respect the fact that private forum owners have much lattitude in running their forums as they see fit (at least until that lattitude turns into abuse). A third reason is that I have a couple of people I consider friends here and whom I have a great deal of respect for who look favorably on ML because of the value of what he has contributed. And a fourth reason is that I too take into consideration the positive he has contributed here, and in that aspect I have even been somewhat of a fan at times.
ML likes to quote the Bible a lot. It is my hope that he will change a bit from the fire and brimstone Old Testament ML and return as more of a New Testament kind of guy. In a Biblical context, I am certainly no one to cast the first stone, as I have a combative tendency that has caused me to react in ways in the past that I look back on with regret. I still have to contend with that and try to be a kinder, gentler soul for the most part - which often requires taking my own time out, thinking before I leap in to counter a real or imagined slight, trying very hard to not quell disagreements just because they do not fit my own paradigm, and often making quick revisions when I read what I have posted and imagine myself as the other party. And I still screw up at times even then.
We all have the capacity to change - even old crusty dogs like myself . . . and hopefully ML too.
All the best,
DQ
These are the Facts, now everyone reading can decide who is in violation of the Terms of Service!
Invincible for being Non-supportive on this Private forum or me for making correction to her Non-supportive post!
I would say for changing the wording of a post. What is the purpose of having PUBLIC forums when you are only allowed to read the rantings of one person who does not even understand the most basic concepts of chemistry and medicine? I have to say that Moreless also edited some of my posts on his forum before he banned me from there for proving him wrong. And to this day I still think that was wrong. Those posts were MY creations, not his. Moreless had no right to change the wording so my post said what he wanted it to say while my name was still attached to the post. It makes me look like I was the one that wrote the ludicrous statements that actually he wrote. So no matter how you want to try and justify Moreless' actions, he was WRONG!!!! And not just over editing people's posts with his own words. Also for his bullying tactics against anyone posting that his protocol did not work, that they were injured by his protocol, or that disagreed with him or proved him wrong. A lot of good intelligent people left these boards because of his tactics. I think Moreless should be permanently banned this time!!!