Hi Chris,
I wasn't going to reply in this thread but the more I thought about it the more I felt I had to speak up.
"In addition, if it satisfies and appeases your sense of "belligerence" against these posts within the WFSF then I shall have a chat with the other mods on that forum to see if we are willing to move those threads to the Diet and Nutrition Support Forum. I can't be more fair than that.......can I?"
I disagree 100% with your statement above and I'll tell you why. Doing things like this is one of the big problems we have in the world today. For instance one woman doesn't like that in the U.S. we have prayer in school, so what happens prayer is outlawed in schools. But it goes further now prayer is outlawed at the start of all football, baseball, or any school related games. This has happened in the U.S. with race relations too, you can't say one thing but another thing is OK. There is a bill waiting to be passed saying that pastors will be prosecuted if they speak against being gay during a sermon in their own church. I'm sure this bill will pass because the minority are the loudest against this. When it passes pastors will be jailed for teaching out of the word of God. I know those examples don't have anything to do with water fasting but I'm trying to make the point that all suffer for one person who is offended, and thats NOT FAIR.
We have rights too and I would say if you took a pole in the WFSF regarding Mouseclicks posts on nutrition the majority would tell you to leave them where they are because they are related to the pre-fast and the post-fast. Why would you want to try and appease one person who has come to the forum to cause hate and discontent? This guy does the same thing all over the internet at each and every site he posts on. Its apparent he will continue to post nonsense trying to get someone to argue with him on the debate forum because he has been rightly banned from the WFSF. You are correct in saying he's acting like a 2 year old to get his way and what happens when you cave in to that 2 year old? That 2 year old will go on to worse behavior.
Its a very simple matter for him to skip the posts he doesn't want to read. I would ask you not to move those threads because of one bad apple. I'll have to say that I agree with everything you post but I'll have to say I don't agree with you moving those threads, it would be a mistake. I respect you for all you give to the WFSF and elsewhere I'm sure, just as I respect Mouseclick for his help in showing good nutrition relates to the water fast, in fact its a very important element because if one goes back to the way they were eating before the fast they will have voided all they gained from the fast. So I would ask you to carefully consider all the ramifications before moving those threads.
With the upmost respect
Willow
Hi Chris,
Thank you so much for not taking offense at what I said because I didn't intend to offend you I just wanted to voice my opinion and I'm sure from my post you can tell that its a strong one to say the least.
Wanting to satisfy everyone is a great trait to have and I've had that for most of my life but I've come to realize that by giving in to that trait on everything I have lost freedoms that I truly value that I could have maintained if I along with others had voiced my opinion. So I have come to the decision from now on that I will voice my opinion if I feel strongly enough about the subject.
Thank you for understanding Chris, BTW Abraham Lincoln was a pretty clever guy I think.
Have a great weekend, they go by too fast LOL.
Willow
Brucester,
I will waste my time posting on you one more time and then no matter what you say I will not reply because you are so not worth my time.
Just to set the record straight I am not "the crazy relgious lady" I simply used those as an example because those are the ones that stand out in the United States.
"Banning me is the very censorship you are talking about."
I would imagine you were banned because of your behavior which is no fault of mine. You did that to yourself buddy! I posted the definition of an Internet Troll from the TOS for you but I guess you didn't read it. Maybe you should.
"Again, its not one person who has a problem with the censorship of the mods here and the bible bashers fasting for jesus. Read my PMs."
You are wrong again. I would say the vast majority aren't bothered by the nutrition threads as they tie into the fasting experience. The only time the Moderators intervene and ban someone is when they get nasty like you did which goes against the TOS or if someone is posting information that is not true and is dangerous. It seems you came to the forum for nothing but to cause discontent, it seems you have a problem with the Moderators having the authority to ban you. Again I will say if you don't want to read a thread skip over it, most times it will say in the title its off topic or O/T which gives you the option to skip that thread. Its as simple as that. Why are you set on causing trouble? You have made a total of 49 posts, you haven't been here long and yet you come in here and want to change the way the forum works. You might find more than one person who agrees with you but positively not the majority. There have been many subjects posted in the WFSF other than nutrition yet you are only complaining about the nutrition posts. I have no PMs from you and don't wish to get any so I don't know what you're talking about.
"Poor old Chris just wants to please everybody, but in the end, pleases no one.
You can side with the crazy relgious lady or you can get these forums back on topic and do what a moderator is supposed to do."
The Moderators are doing a great job, they aren't in the habit of banning people except when they encounter people like you who don't follow the TOS. If I posted like you did I would expect to be banned. A moderator is in place to enforce the TOS and that is what they do. Since you're haven't been around long you don't know enough about Chris to say he pleases no one so I'm telling you nothing could be further from the truth. You also don't know Mouseclick or you would know he has helped many people with his nutrition posts in relation to breaking a water fast as has Chris which is why the posts about nutrition are in the WFSF.
To wrap this up I want to say you have the right to post what you want within the guidelines of the TOS which you have already broken. I also have the right to talk about nutrition in the Water Fasting Forum if it pertains to the water fast. Sometimes things get off topic but that means nothing in the scheme of things in this world and as I said you can skip over them. You have a habit of causing discontent by posting outrageously, not just at CureZone but all over the internet to provoke people and that is not acceptable behavior at CureZone, its called being a TROLL.
I hope that in the future you can release your anger in a positive way in your real life instead of coming to the WFSF and spewing discontent, that is if you get reinstated. It doesn't matter one way or the other to me.
Willow
Thank you Rainy, I guess you can tell I feel very strongly regarding those posts. The knowledge he has shared regarding nutrition has been extremely important to me especially when I broke my 21 day fast. I fasted to reset my tastes and thanks to Mouseclick and his posts on nutrition I have maintained a healthy plant based nutritious diet since my fast.
Both Mouseclick and Chris have given expert guidance toward living a healthy balanced life. The WFF wouldn't be the same without them both.
Willow