I realize full well how things can be manipulated in the mainstream media, but, even putting aside the reputed charges of promising a cure for cerebral palsy I find it a bit disturbing that Devgan pled guilty to drug trafficking charges after evidently prescribing oxycodone and other painkillers with a street value of $400,000 after his license was revoked. I also find my eyebrows raised a bit by the fact that he was reported to have filed bankruptcy in 1989, 1993 and 1999 to discharge a total of over $9 Million in debts, yet was reported to be renting a $3.6 Million dollar seaside estate he used for a home and one of his offices in California in 2000 until it closed.
No doubt, government persecution and prosecution may have played large parts in the bankruptcies, but a picture nevertheless emerges of perhaps someone living large and beyond their means. To me, that brings up the question of the temptation to perhaps bend ethics to support such a lifestyle. Lust for money and luxury is a great temptation and it can lead people to commit dark acts at the same time that they do good ones. Perhaps such was the case with Ravi Devgan?
At any rate, people do not die of "natural causes" at the age of 61, whereas people die in prison all the time of violent and less than natural causes. Something seems clearly amiss.
DQ