Not being able to start on chemo or radiation may be the best news he could have. The oxygen he is taking is likely to do far more good than any evil mainstream regimen of chemo or radiation.
My uncle is 85 and he had lung cancer last year that the oncologists assured him would be eliminated with radiation but wasn't and instead continued to grow and spread to other parts of his body. When they recommended even stronger radiation plus chemo, he instead began taking the oleander extract mentioned in my above post (http://curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1081775#i) and following other parts of my recommended protocol and within only a few months was cancer free and back to enjoying a round of daily golf.
Best of wishes for your father.
DQ
"Chemo and radiation have never cured anyone of cancer -....."
I'd like to see you back that statement up.
My brother's cancer was cured with radiation therapy (would not have been my choice, but he was cured). Medically diagnosed before, and after the cure. Yeah, he only lived for 10 years after the cancer was cured having passed on at age 88.
I worked with a man several years ago who was cured of lymph node cancer with chemo therapy. I only saw him for about 15 years after his cure, so I don't know how long he has lived.
So there are two cases that I'm aware of - either one of which makes your statement a lie.
You promote oleander in many of your cancer support posts, yet it is a poison and is no different than chemotherapy.
Quotes below are from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Oleander_Leaf.asp?sitearea...
The effectiveness of oleander has not been proven. In the test tube, Anvirzel (i.e., oleander) appeared to slow the growth of cells from human bladder cancers, but human studies are needed to find out if it will work in people. Very early studies of carefully dosed oleander extract (Anvirzel) in people with cancer have not yet shown that it helps. Side effects included nausea and vomiting, aches, and redness at the injection site, but the drug did not appear to affect the cancer in these patients. One very early study of 18 patients with advanced cancer was mainly done to decide on the best dose of the drug. No measurable responses in their cancers were noted during this small study. Although there are claims that Anvirzel improves quality of life, reduces pain, increases energy, and causes cancer regression and remission, available scientific evidence does not support these claims.
Another company planned to offer an oleander extract that could be placed under the tongue, which they named Xenavex. Phase I and Phase II clinical trials on Xenavex were announced in 2005 on people with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, these clinical trials were not done, and the announcements were later removed from the federal clinical trials website. The company did not return calls or emails about the product.
You will notice in the above paragraph that there were no measurable cancer responses in any of these studies. You will also notice that the side effects of this poison are exactly the same as for chemotherapy, yet I'm sure you would label it a "healing crisis." It's great that in alternative therapies there are "healing crisis'" while when assessing allopathic treatment it's called "side effects."
">- My brother's cancer was cured with radiation therapy (would
not have been my choice, but he was cured). Medically diagnosed before, and
after the cure. Yeah, he only lived for 10 years after the cancer was cured
having passed on at age 88.
Are you so sure that he did not beat the cancer despite the radiation?"
I'm positive his cancer was cured by radiation.
">- You promote oleander in many of your cancer support posts, yet
it is a poison and is no different than chemotherapy.
While I do not promote oleander, I disagree with you. There is a difference.
Oleander soup is a natural substance that has had the poison removed from
it."
I was referring to another poster regarding oleander, but please provide some evidence for it that the "soup" is poison free. If it were, why aren't pharmaceuticals climbing on it? They sure tried to climb aboard oleander in other ways.
"???? Sorry, they are the last site in the world that I would consider as either authoritative or unbiased. In fact, they are the opposite, actually a propoganda machine. They have disparaged even highly proven alternative and nutritional therapies. Their funds (the parts that are not taken off the top) are dedicated to pharmaceutical research and printing anti alternative literature."
So, science is not a good source for information?
"The companies response is:
Xenavex™ is available as a prescription item. For the purposes of our clinical
studies, we have renamed Xenavex as "SAOB-0401" in order to demark it
as an investigational new drug, insofar as any uses other than its labeled
indications are concerned."
I do not find where is it either approved or used as an anti-cancer drug.
"-> why aren't pharmaceuticals climbing on it?
For one thing, lack of profitability. The first thing that a pharmaceutical
company does before even starting to investigate is to evaluate whether or not a
profit can be recovered. If it can not or is not likely, they drop it like a hot
potato."
Then tell me how it was that the pharmaceuticals took the content of Red Rice
Yeast and turned it into a cholesterol lowering prescription drug? They're
still making mega bucks from it. The FDA is now banning all over the
counter products (as in Red Yeast Rice) that contain that ingredient.
"Science, yes, but I have not seen the ACS run one single unbiased
study using a natural substance. It is easy to tilt the results of any study by
using less than effective dosages, improper control group management, etc.
I certainly know the value of a well run scientific study and am experienced in
this. I have cultured tumor cells in the lab as far back as the 1970's and know
that there are many things that they are sensitive to.
If you have any doubt about the efficacy of natural substances in treating
cancer then you should visit the AICR. They publish the results of hundreds of
studies every year and only test natural and nutritional therapies.
Also, visit the Life Extension Foundation. They also study many alternative and
nutritional suppliments and publish this scientific data.
So, you see, the ACS is hiding the truth and promoting bias. The extent of their
effort is embarasing to say the least. I personally am ashamed that I was so
ignorant as to support them until a couple of years ago."
When I was diagnosed with cancer 15 years ago, it was the ACS that provided me with more information about my condition than my urologist had. I was on a telephone line to an ACS RN who also knew more about my condition than my physician and she spent close to an hour discussing questions that I had. She sent me a package of up to date medical research and treatment information that I had in my hand when I walked into my surgeon's office to cancel my surgery date. He wasn't even aware of some of what I had in my hand. And cancel my surgery date I did - much to his chagrin. So I owe my prostate to what ACS gave me and I really don't see anything in error on that site that I linked to. Now if you want to get me talking about the American Diabetes Association, that's an entirely different story. They are literally killing people with their recommendations.
If you brother's cancer did not return after his radiation therapy, then he is one of the whopping 3% that remain in remission after treatments. His immune system was strong enough to prevent the cancer's return. And be very thankful, because this is not the norm. Chemo and radiation therapy not only destroy the cancer cells themselves but every healthy cell around them also. These treatments seriously compromise the immune system. To your brother's good fortune I would attribute that maybe at this point he took charge of his health? He carefully watched his nutrition? Took supplements to help boost the immune system? This is only the second testimony I have personally heard of cancer not returning after treatment. And most times it is within a year, or a couple of years at the most, should remission actually occur. In the first instance the lady in question was taking natural supplements and changed her entire life to focus on nutrition, exercise and health. She still follows a very strict health regimen.
Oleander is very different from chemotherapy. Although toxic in its raw state, when made into a soup according to directions and taken according to directions, it loses its toxicity and has shown to have wondrous results in people with cancer and other illnesses as well. Now in reply to your question as to why pharmaceuticals aren't climbing on it, the answer is very simple. Because it will not make the money they desire. All pharmaceutical drugs have side effects that lead to other conditions. Notice the number of people taking a large amount of prescription pills daily. So in essence, the patients are not healed. Their symptoms are merely covered up. A very sad fact about the medical profession these days is that doctors do not "cure" you. They "treat" you. It is really up to you to take charge of your health and cure yourself.
Unfortunately, no, science is no longer a good source of information, as its main goals have become control, power, and wealth. Science and the medical profession have become a total sham. Look at the cost of these prescription drugs and look at today's doctors' fees. Why in the world would a profession dedicated to healing the public do such a thing to people? Insurance companies? Look at the escalating prices with less and less medical coverage. The only ones they care about are themselves. Gone ar the days of the healer, the doctor who would come to your house at any hour of the night because you needed him; the doctor who would waive his fee for those who could not afford it because his main goal was to heal. These were the days when the Hippocratic Oath meant something. By the way, the original Hippocratic Oath has been edited. It is different.
You say that your brother lived for 10 years after the cancer was cured. If you don't mind my asking what was it that took his life? I really don't understand the meaning you are trying to get across, whether it's "well, he only lived for 10 years but he died at a ripe old age," or whether you are saying, "look he lived for 10 years after that to a ripe old age." In any event, although 88 is considered to be a "ripe old age" where one has lived a fulfilling life, our bodies were meant to last much longer. Someone who has lived a healthy life, watching what foods they eat, exercising, and using the proper supplements, is able to most certainly live quite a bit longer and still be active and have use of all their faculties. I run across both types of people, those who are very ill in their 50's and those in their 90's living a healthy, happy and fulfilling life. And these are the ones that are not on any prescription drugs whatsoever.
In the end, it is God's Garden that heals you. Man will never be able to improve on it.
Blessings,
Luella May