Your twisting everything. I am not doing the 30 day cleans program. I am buying his superfood supplements. You should actually read what I post before accusing me of things I didn't say.

I did not accuse you of anything, why are you being so paranoid?  Is it a side effect of the supplements you are taking?  If you read my post I linked an old post about some of the herbs in Schulze's formulas that have well known side effects.  Among them was the the Superfood, which contains blue-green algae, technically not an algae but rather a cyanobacteria, that contains microcystins and anatoxins.  These are toxic to the nervous system and liver, not to mention the algae is harvested from highly polluted Klamath Lake.  Look up the studies on the lake.  They are trying to figure out how to clean the lake up due to all the agricultural runoff, including herbicides and pesticides, and other pollutants in the lake.  In fact, you cannot grow algae or these cyanobacteria, in a "pristine" lake as the company who harvests the garbage claims the lake is.  Anyway, the link was to a post that was written before you posted about taking the herbs, but it had a reference to the blue-green algae in the Superfood, which is why I linked it.  So to simplify all this so you can understand it, the link to my old post was not about you!!!

Once again I am talking about the SUPERFOODS.

And once again that is why I linked the post that discussed it, rather than retype it.  The post was written before I even knew you existed and thus was not about you.

I didn't refer anyone to buy any herbs. And before you badmouth Dr. Shulze you really should do some research into the people he has cured.

What I don't like is the herbs he chose for the formulations.  Many of them have well known side effects or interactions with other herbs.  There are more effective and safer herbs that do not adversely interact with each other.   Which is why I say that if people are going to design herbal formulations then they should keep up on the chemistry of the herbs to reduce the risk of side effects and adverse herb interactions.  Do you disagree?

As for "people he cured" as I pointed out a lot of people claim to have cured thousands.  But they never seem to be able to provide the proof.  Just like there is a real popular troll here on CZ who claims the protocol he pushes has cured numerous people as well.  Yet the only research that has been presented shows it does not work, and the testimonials provided are unverifiable.  So all we are left with is unverified claims of cures by someone who claims the research proving it works exists but can never present it. Same applies to the various doctors out there who people claim have cured all sorts of people.  Are these cures verifiable or just more sales hype?

He does have proof. He ran his own clinic for years upon years and has evidence of people he has treated and cured.

And again, where is this evidence?  And how many failures were there and how many cases of adverse events from the herbs supplied?

One of the reasons I am so skeptical about these types claims is one that you hear similar hype from MLM companies all the time.  All the miracle cures because the people wherever eat this berry or drink this water.....  And secondly, claims of cures are frequently exaggerated .  For example, doctors claim that chemotherapy has a 70-90% cure rate for cancer, but the research shows the average is actually 2-3% except with vincristine and vinblastine for easier to treat cancers like leukemias and lymphomas.  These drugs do have around a 70-80% success rate for these cancers due to the fact that these drugs are antiviral and therefore address the leukemia and lymphoma viruses.  

And success rates are often skewed since they can consider a person in remission or that feels better a success.  So again, where is the evidence of all these people being cured, or is this simply more unsubstantiated internet hype?