The article here...
Twelve adults gathered in a small, closed courtroom to decide how many powerful, anti-psychotic drugs that the child, who is currently in the custody of the state, would be required to take. The patient did not have a voice, since he was not there. No doctor was present, but plenty of lawyers were. The little boy’s lawyer saw nothing wrong with drugging him into a stupor. As the attorney for the heartbroken mother, I spoke against the whole idea; I suggested to the court that other factors may be causing the child’s problems, and that the compulsory administration of drugs by the state was simply an excuse to avoid addressing those issues.
Full article here:
And getting worse I fear unless we do something about it to change directions.
It didn't seem nearly so bad not all that long ago . . .
http://www.tbyil.com/Take%20Me%20Back.htm
Watching that kind of restores my sanity a bit, or at least lifts my spirit, even if in alonging kind of way and a teardrop in the corner of the eye.
I know you can't go back, no matter how much some might want to, but you can sure decide how you want to go forward. I know what I choose as the best way to stop the downward slide, restore values and liberties and insure that people like us at CureZone are able to address our own health issues and our bodies as we see fit.
http://www.tbyil.com/Ron%20Paul.htm
DQ