Blog: My Quest for the Truth of Life, by Kerminator!
by kerminator

When did the scriptures come about...

How did our English language Bible get here? You often would like to know the way of things... Here's the answer...

Date:   9/21/2007 9:17:43 AM   ( 17 y ) ... viewed 2345 times

 

FYI; this is something to clear up some mysteries in your mind...

 

1. The Targums. After the return from the Captivity, the Jews, no longer familiar with the old Hebrew, required that their Scriptures should be translated for them into the Chaldaic or Aramaic language and interpreted. These translations and paraphrases were at first oral, but they were afterwards reduced to writing, and thus targums, i.e., "versions" or "translations", have come down to us. The chief of these are, (1.) The Onkelos Targum, i.e., the targum of Akelas=Aquila, a targum so called to give it greater popularity by comparing it with the Greek translation of Aquila mentioned below. This targum originated about the second century after Christ. (2.) The targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel comes next to that of Onkelos in respect of age and value. It is more a paraphrase on the Prophets, however, than a translation. Both of these targums issued from the Jewish school which then flourished at Babylon.

2. The Greek Versions. (1.) The oldest of these is the Septuagint, usually quoted as the LXX. The origin of this the most important of all the versions is involved in much obscurity. It derives its name from the popular notion that seventy-two translators were employed on it by the direction of Ptolemy Philadelphus, king of Egypt, and that it was accomplished in seventy-two days, for the use of the Jews residing in that country. There is no historical warrant for this notion. It is, however, an established fact that this version was made at Alexandria; that it was begun about 280 B.C., and finished about 200 or 150 B.C.; that it was the work of a number of translators who differed greatly both in their knowledge of Hebrew and of Greek; and that from the earliest times it has borne the name of "The Septuagint", i.e., The Seventy.

"This version, with all its defects, must be of the greatest interest, (a) as preserving evidence for the text far more ancient than the oldest Hebrew manuscripts; (b) as the means by which the Greek Language was wedded to Hebrew thought; (c) as the source of the great majority of quotations from the Old Testament by writers of the New Testament.
(2.) The New Testament manuscripts fall into two divisions, Uncials, written in Greek capitals, with no distinction at all between the different words, and very little even between the different lines; and Cursives, in small Greek letters, and with divisions of words and lines. The change between the two kinds of Greek writing took place about the tenth century. Only five manuscripts of the New Testament approaching to completeness are more ancient than this dividing date. The first, numbered A, is the Alexandrian manuscript. Though brought to this country by Cyril Lucar, patriarch of Constantinople, as a present to Charles I., it is believed that it was written, not in that capital, but in Alexandria; whence its title. It is now dated in the fifth century A.D. The second, known as B, is the Vatican manuscript. (See VATICANUS.) The Third, C, or the Ephraem manuscript, was so called because it was written over the writings of Ephraem, a Syrian theological author, a practice very common in the days when writing materials were scarce and dear. It is believed that it belongs to the fifth century, and perhaps a slightly earlier period of it than the manuscript A. The fourth, D, or the manuscript of Beza, was so called because it belonged to the reformer Beza, who found it in the monastery of St. Irenaeus at Lyons in 1562 A.D. It is imperfect, and is dated in the sixth century. The fifth (called Aleph) is the Sinaitic manuscript. (See SINAITICUS.)

3. The Syriac Versions. (See SYRIAC.)
4. The Latin Versions. A Latin version of the Scriptures, called the "Old Latin," which originated in North Africa, was in common use in the time of Tertullian (A.D. 150). Of this there appear to have been various copies or recensions made. That made in Italy, and called the Itala, was reckoned the most accurate. This translation of the Old Testament seems to have been made not from the original Hebrew but from the LXX.
This version became greatly corrupted by repeated transcription, and to remedy the evil Jerome (A.D. 329-420) was requested by Damasus, the bishop of Rome, to undertake a complete revision of it. It met with opposition at first, but was at length, in the seventh century, recognized as the "Vulgate" version. It appeared in a printed from about A.D. 1455, the first book that ever issued from the press. The Council of Trent (1546) declared it "authentic." It subsequently underwent various revisions, but that which was executed (1592) under the sanction of Pope Clement VIII. was adopted as the basis of all subsequent editions. It is regarded as the sacred original in the Roman Catholic Church. All modern European versions have been more or less influenced by the Vulgate. This version reads ipsa instead of ipse in Gen. 3:15, "She shall bruise thy head."

5. There are several other ancient versions which are of importance for Biblical critics, but which we need not mention particularly, such as the Ethiopic, in the fourth century, from the LXX.; two Egyptian versions, about the fourth century, the Memphitic, circulated in Lower Egypt, and the Thebaic, designed for Upper Egypt, both from the Greek; the Gothic, written in the German language, but with the Greek alphabet, by Ulphilas (died A.D. 388), of which only fragments of the Old Testament remain; the Armenian, about A.D. 400; and the Slavonic, in the ninth century, for ancient Moravia. Other ancient versions, as the Arabic, the Persian, and the Anglo-Saxon, may be mentioned.

6. The history of the English versions begins properly with Wyckliffe. Portions, however, of the Scriptures were rendered into Saxon (as the Gospel according to John, by Bede, A.D. 735), and also into English (by Orme, called the "Ormulum," a portion of the Gospels and of the Acts in the form of a metrical paraphrase, toward the close of the seventh century), long before Wyckliffe; but it is to him that the honour belongs of having first rendered the whole Bible into English (A.D. 1380). This version was made from the Vulgate, and renders Gen. 3:15 after that Version, "She shall trede thy head."

This was followed by Tyndale's translation (1525-1531); Miles Coverdale's (1535-1553); Thomas Matthew's (1537), really, however, the work of John Rogers, the first martyr under the reign of Queen Mary. This was properly the first Authorized Version, Henry VIII. having ordered a copy of it to be got for every church. This took place in less than a year after Tyndale was martyred for the crime of translating the Scriptures. In 1539 Richard Taverner published a revised edition of Matthew's Bible. The Great Bible, so called from its great size, called also Cranmer's Bible, was published in 1539 and 1568. In the strict sense, the "Great Bible" is "the only authorized version; for the Bishops' Bible and the present Bible [the A.V.] never had the formal sanction of royal authority." Next in order was the Geneva version (1557-1560); the Bishops' Bible (1568); the Rheims and Douai versions, under Roman Catholic auspices (1582, 1609); the Authorized Version (1611); and the Revised Version of the New Testament in 1880 and of the Old Testament in 1884.

 

BTW: The Authorized Version (1611) is commonly know as the King James Version...   Maybe will help you see the chain or progression of the Holy Scriptures...   

Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!

Print this page
Email this page
DISCLAIMER / WARNING   Alert Webmaster


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.438 sec, (2)

Back to blog!
 
Add Blog To Favorites!
 
Add This Entry To Favorites!

Comments (25 of 164):
Re: The Divided Mi… kermi… 10 y
Re: The Divided Mi… chark… 10 y
Re: Paradigm Cage … kermi… 10 y
Re: An altered vie… kermi… 11 y
Re: The Awesum Tru… kermi… 11 y
Re: Gospel Truth P… kermi… 11 y
Re: Be careful wha… kermi… 11 y
Re: Sin as it effe… kermi… 11 y
Re: Truth part 5 kerminat… 11 y
Re: ADHD is False? kermi… 11 y
Re: ADHD is False? jalen… 11 y
Re: Why Pray? Par… kermi… 11 y
Re: Have you been … kermi… 11 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … kermi… 12 y
Re: aduron drugs c… kermi… 12 y
aduron drugs cure … RHOND… 12 y
Re: Balling & Squa… kermi… 13 y
Re: Balling & Squa… agt19… 13 y
Re: Men and Women'… kermi… 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … kermi… 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … mo123 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … kermi… 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … mo123 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … kermi… 13 y
Re: Broke, Broke, … mo123 13 y
All Comments (164)

Blog Entries (12 of 310):
When did the scriptures come…  17 y
We are all hero's waiting fo…  17 y
The Spirit World...  17 y
Just maybe we should think a…  17 y
Three steps of Martial Arts …  17 y
When is the TRUTH a LIE??  17 y
Some blogs from cyber space...  17 y
Our immediate concern, is no…  17 y
Strawberry Meth; what crap!!  17 y
Boundries...  17 y
An outline for success in li…  17 y
A loving Attitude will incre…  17 y
All Entries (310)

Blogs by kerminator (6):
My Unusual Road of Life....  26 mon  (1929)
Absolute Truth Some Wisdom an…  3 y  (291)
Ya’ think??  3 y  (275)
Brain Boot Camp or Mindset Ma…  27 mon  (224)
Southern Etiquette or life in…  3 y  (212)
Forgotten Words!  28 mon  (120)

Similar Blogs (10 of 185):
My News  by DetLew  8 mon
Photographer   by Photographer2  8 mon
IT-blog  by DetLew  11 mon
WordPress plugins  by HowdyT  12 mon
Interesting Facts  by AnnaGerman  12 mon
Деm…  by AmeliaGO  12 mon
AI in Daily Lives  by alinasamchenko  13 mon
Henry Blogs  by henryjonas59  13 mon
New Case  by newcasecomau  14 mon
free credit score  by kaviharshu99  17 mon
All Blogs (1,019)

Back to blog!
 

Lugol’s Iodine Free S&H
J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine Solution. Restore lost reserves.



Kidney Stones Remedy
Hulda Clark Cleanses