Got Freedom From Government?

"The Declaration of Independence" (our first Organic Law) was a declaration of freedom from government!

Date:   6/18/2014 3:58:58 AM   ( 10 y ) ... viewed 2591 times

December 26, 2020 - “Healthy American” Freedom -

The following is a reply sent on December 23, 2020 to an initiative for “Healthy American” freedom that cited a certain “federal law".

Just prior to sending my inquiry I had located the citations in an online CFR. I then realized that I am not willing not make any assumptions about these "federal laws". That is why I am asking for (what I now call) the "Positive Law" that forms the basis for these codes that you say "apply to the entire US".

I am asking for this because every "law" has limited jurisdiction and it is essential for me to identify the limits. To accomplish this it needs to be noted that the "US" is an ambiguous term that most certainly needs to be positively defined. Identifying the lawful definition of this term is absolutely necessary for understanding the limited jurisdiction of any "code". I am reasonably certain that "US" = "United States" however there are several distinct definitions for "United States" and it is utterly crucial to include the one definition in this instance.

I don't expect that you may know the answer to my inquiry at this time and if you don't happen to know then I wish to very warmly invite you to begin looking into what "Fundamental American Law" is - because that is the Lawful standard by which any code, regulation "Act of Congress" or the like needs to me measured against. Then if the "federal law" is in conflict with "Fundamental American Law" it is completely "null and void" of actual Lawful authority over the American people.

It is an undisputed principal in Law that Government can only Lawfully regulate what Government actually owns. It is because of the nature of this proprietary jurisdiction that I am committed to question governmental "authority". I sincerely hope that you can understand the importance of what I am presenting here - for the sake of true freedom. If that is possible then I would greatly appreciate it if you would kindly show me the "Positive Law"!
-

***
July 9, 2020 - Today's post follows the entry on March 28, 2019 (about a quarter of the page down).
-

May 30, 2020 - "Did you know the Declaration of Independence is law? -

The official print edition of the United States Code which contain the 'general and permanent
laws of the United States (updated every six years by the government printing office)' contains
in Volume One at the very beginning a section called 'The Organic Laws of the United States
of America.' Clicking on the Office of Law Revision Counsel’s link to the United States Code, at
http://uscode.house.gov/browse/frontmatter/organiclaws&edition=prelim reveals that these
Organic Laws are first and foremost in the official publication of the laws of the United States.
These Organic Laws are the supreme law of the United States, taking precedence over all
others. A law that conflicts with their provisions is void and unenforceable.

In that beginning section of the United States Code are these four 'Organic Laws of the United
States': The Unanimous Declaration of the united 'States of America'; the Articles of
Confederation creating a confederacy of sovereign states called 'The United States of America'
and a federal body called 'the United States in Congress Assembled'; the Northwest Ordinance
of 1787, creating a temporary government for federal territory called the 'United States' and
making rules for the admission of new states to the Confederacy; and the Federal Constitution
of 1787 which reorganized the 'United States' (i.e. the federal government) but which did
NOT repeal any of the preceding organic laws!

Therefore, to properly understand your relationship with state and federal government, you
have to be familiar with the context provided by those three preceding organic laws of the
United States. ... Suffice to say, the Organic Laws of the USA are still the law today, so your unalienable rights are always there waiting for you to recognize them; and that the law requires that all of your dealings with anyone, including the government, be with your consent. If your experience tells you otherwise, it is only because YOU have not recognized your unalienable rights, so you have failed to recognize when you are waiving them.

I highly recommend Ed Rivera’s Organic Laws Institute website for more information on this
fascinating topic, particularly as to how Americans have been scammed by the Federal
Constitution for 240 years. Primarily by confusing the definition of 'United States'—which
the Supreme Court admits has at least three different definitions.

The bottom line is that your unalienable rights are the fundamental law of the USA; and the
protection of those rights is the only reason for the government to exist in the first place.
Naturally, then, the government cannot lawfully violate these rights. So your inherent rights
are inherent limitations on government power."[32]*
-

***
April 6, 2020 - Contemplating and Digesting "The Declaration of Independence." -

'We hold these truths to be self-evident," - We do not need to look to any external "authority" in any regards for "these truths" and therefore we do not need any external authority to acknowledge let alone agree with "these truths" in order for these truths to be validated. "These truths" are self-evident!

"that all men are created equal," - We are all born "with certain unalienable Rights." We do not have to do anything at all to obtain this equality of "certain unalienable Rights."

"that they are endowed by their Creator" - Our "certain unalienable Rights" come from the Creator and not from any government. Government is not the source of our certain unalienable Rights.

"with certain unalienable Rights," - Unalienable means these Rights can not be aliened upon in any way, shape or form.

"that among these are Life," - Here's a dyad to more appreciate "Life" and most especially your life: Tell me what life is.

"Liberty" - Here's a dyad to more appreciate "Liberty" and most especially your Liberty: Tell me what Liberty is.

"and the pursuit of Happiness."- Here's a dyad to more appreciate "Happiness" and most especially your Happiness: Tell me what Happiness is.

"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men," - This is the very first as well as the ultimate purpose of government - preserve and protect these "certain unalienable Rights" that are "endowed by (our) Creator."

"deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," - This is government that is truly "of the people, by the people and for the people" in every sense of the word.

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends," - Whenever the "Acts" of any government deny the purpose for which government was "instituted".

"it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it," - In the present instance the "Form of Government" is incorporated as a legal fiction/fictitious entity and we the people can abolish it by withdrawing the corporate charter.

"and to institute new Government," - The "new Government" is actually the original self-government of the people in existence as of the second Organic Law: The Articles of Confederation as well as the very source of self government in place before these "Articles."

"laying its foundation on such principles" - The first principal in this instance is absolute liberty from external government thus underscoring the absolute freedom of each and every individual under the common law.

"and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." -
--

In any case, this is the first Organic Law of and for "The United States of America" (unincorporated) and it is acknowledged (literally) in front of all the United States Codes (as this Blog-writer has presented in previous posts). As such we the American people can respond to any and all "offers" from government with this first and superior "Law" as it precedes all written "law" coming out of Washington DC and any of its municipal and territorial franchises.
-

***
March 8, 2020 - Got Birth Certificate? -

"All recordings of birth taking place on these shores are to be referred to us and all registrations pertaining to births in the American States are to be returned for review to ascertain actual political status."[31]
-

***
October 29, 2019 - "Freedom isn't free. ...

Sometimes it requires action on the battlefield, and sometimes it requires knowing who you are, and sometimes it requires acting upon your responsibilities as an American to exercise your right to self-govern and enforce all the other rights and material interests you are heir to.

Nobody can do that 'for' you. It's that lonesome valley we have to walk by ourselves, rooted in our self-knowledge, in our sense of justice, and our determination not be be ruled over by self-serving corporations.

Some people have misunderstood --- accidentally-on-purpose --- my role as Fiduciary of The United States of America.
Please note, that there are supposed to be around 270 million adults in this country, and therefore, around 270 million Fiduciaries; instead, when Push Came to Shove, only one lonely old woman stepped forward to do her Public Duty. ..."[28]
-

***
August 2, 2019 - Unalienable Rights Are Not “Civil Rights” -

"Nearly all civil statutes are law ONLY for government or officers of the government and CANNOT and DO NOT regulate or protect PRIVATE UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. See:
Why Statutory Civil Law Is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form #05.037
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

• If you don’t claim STATUTORY citizenship or civil domicile that makes it possible, then:
– You retrain ALL of your PRIVATE natural rights.
– You may not be sued under the civil statutory codes/franchises.
– You may be sued under the common law and equity.
– The government and everyone else HAS to leave you alone. That’s the definition of 'justice' itself."[23]
-

***
October 20, 2019 - More About Domicile -

1. Introduction

5 The purpose of establishing government is solely to provide “protection”. Those who wish to be protected
6 by a specific government must expressly consent to be protected by choosing a domicile within the civil
7 jurisdiction of that specific government.[25]
8 Those who have made such a choice and thereby become “customers” of the protection afforded by
9 government are called by any of the following names under the civil laws of the jurisdiction they have
10 nominated to protect them:
11 1.1. “citizens”, if they were born somewhere within the country which the jurisdiction is a part.
12 1.2. “residents” (aliens) if they were born within the country in which the jurisdiction is a part.
13 1.3. "inhabitants", which encompasses both "citizens", and "residents" but excludes foreigners.
14 1.4. "persons".
15 1.5. "individuals".
16 Those who have not become “customers” or “protected persons” of a specific government are called by
17 any of the following names within the civil laws of the jurisdiction they have refused to nominate as their
18 protector and may NOT be called by any of the names in item 1 above:
19 2.1. “nonresidents”.
20 2.2. “transient foreigners”.
21 2.3. "stateless persons".
22 2.4. “in transitu”.
23 2.5. “transient”.
24 2.6. “sojourner”.
25 2.7. “civilly dead”.
26 In law, the process of choosing a domicile within the jurisdiction of a specific government is called
27 “animus manendi”. Latin is used to describe the process because judges don’t want you knowing that
28 you can choose NOT to be protected by the civil statutory law. That choice makes you a consenting
29 party to the “civil contract”, “social compact”, and “private law” that attaches to and therefore protects all
30 “inhabitants” and things physically situated on or within that specific territory, venue, and jurisdiction. In a
31 sense then, your consent to a specific jurisdiction by your choice of domicile within that jurisdiction is what
32 creates the civil statutory "person", "individual", "citizen", "resident", or "inhabitant" which is the only
33 proper subject of the civil statutory laws enacted by that government. In other words, choosing a domicile
34 within a specific jurisdiction causes an implied waiver of sovereign immunity, because the courts admit
35 that the term "person" does not refer to the "sovereign": “Since in common usage, the term person does
36 not include the sovereign, statutes not employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it.”
37 [United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941)] “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject
38 to law for it is the author and source of law;” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)] “There is no such
39 thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty
40 resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution
41 entrusted to it: All else is withheld.” [Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)] Those who have become
42 customers of government protection by choosing a civil domicile within a specific government then owe a
43 duty to pay for the support of the protection they demand. The method of paying for said protection is
44 called “taxes”. In earlier times this kind of sponsorship was called “tribute”. “TRIBUTE. Tribute in the sense
45 of an impost paid by one state to another, as a mark of subjugation, is a common feature of international
46 relationships in the biblical world. The tributary could be either a hostile state or an ally. Like deportation,
47 its purpose was to weaken a hostile state. Deportation aimed at depleting the man-power. The aim of
48 tribute was probably twofold: to impoverish the subjugated state and at the same time
-
1 to increase the conqueror’s own revenues and to acquire commodities in short supply in his own country.
2 As an instrument of administration it was one of the simplest ever devised: the subjugated country could
3 be made responsible for the payment of a yearly tribute. Its non-arrival would be taken as a sign of
4 rebellion, and an expedition would then be sent to deal with the recalcitrant. This was probably the
5 reason for the attack recorded in Gn. 14. [New Bible Dictionary. Third Edition. Wood, D. R. W., Wood,
6 D. R. W., & Marshall, I. H. 1996, c1982, c1962; InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove] Domicile is an
7 EXTREMELY important subject to learn because it defines and circumscribes:1 The boundary between
8 what is legislatively "foreign" and legislatively "domestic" in relation to a specific jurisdiction. Everyone
9 domiciled OUTSIDE a specific
10 jurisdiction is legislatively and statutorily "foreign" in relation to that civil jurisdiction. Note that
11 you can be DOMESTIC from a CONSTITUTIONAL perspective and yet ALSO be FOREIGN from a
12 legislative jurisdiction AT THE SAME TIME. This is true of the relationship of most Americans with the
13 national government. The boundary between what is POLITICAL speech and LEGAL speech. For
14 everyone not domiciled in a specific jurisdiction, the civil law of that jurisdiction is POLITICAL and
15 unenforceable. Since real constitutional courts cannot entertain political questions, then they cannot act
16 in a political capacity against nonresidents. So let us begin our coverage of this MOST important subject.
17 2. Definition - Domicile is legally defined as follows. We also include the definition of “situs” to help clarify
18 its meaning: “domicile. A person's legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent
19 home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning.
20 Smith v. Smith, 206 Pa.Super. 310, 213 A.2d. 94. Generally, physical presence within a state and the
21 intention to make it one's home are the requisites of establishing a “domicile” therein. The permanent
22 residence of a person or the place to which he intends to return even though he may actually reside
23 elsewhere. A person may have more than one residence but only one domicile. The legal domicile of a
24 person is important since it, rather than the actual residence, often controls the jurisdiction of the taxing
25 authorities and determines where a person may exercise the privilege of voting and other legal rights and
26 privileges.” [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 485]
27 __________________________________________________________________________________________
28 “Situs. Lat. Situation; location; e.g. location or place of crime or business. Site; position; the place where a
29 thing is considered, for example, with reference to jurisdiction over it, or the right or power to tax it. It
30 imports fixedness of location. Situs of property, for tax purposes, is determined by whether the taxing
31 state has sufficient contact with the personal property sought to be taxed to justify in fairness the
32 particular tax. Town of Cady v. Alexander Const. Co., 12 Wis.2d. 236, 107 N.W.2d. 267, 270.”
33 Generally, personal property has its taxable “situs” in that state where owner of it is domiciled. Smith v.
34 Lummus, 149 Fla. 660, 6 So.2d. 625, 627, 628. Situs of a trust means place of performance of active
35 duties of trustee. Campbell v. Albers, 313 Ill.App. 152, 39 N.E.2d. 672, 676.”
36 [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1387]
37 Notice in the definition of “domicile” above the absence of the word “consent” and replacing it with the
38 word “intent” to disguise the true nature of what they are saying. Lawyers and politicians don't want you
39 to know that they need your consent to make you into a “taxpayer” with a “domicile” within their
40 jurisdiction, even though this is in fact the case. More on this later.
41 An exhaustive academic treatise on the subject of domicile also candidly admits that there is no all-
42 encompassing definition for "domicile".
43 §57. Difficulty of Defining Domicil.-- The difficulty, if not impossibility, of arriving at an entirely satisfactory
44 definition of domicile has been frequently commented upon. Lord Alvanley, in Somerville v. Somerville,
45 praised the wisdom of Bynkershoek in not hazarding a definition; and Dr. Lushington, in Maltass v.
46 Maltass, speaking of the various attempts of jurists in this direction, considered himself justified in the
47 remarkable language of Hertius: "Verum in iis definiendis mirum est quam sudant doctores." Lord
48 Chelmsford, speaking, as late as 1863, in the case of Moorhouse v. Lord, says: "The difficulty of getting
49 a satisfactory definition of domicil, which will meet every case, has often been admitted, and every
50 attempt to frame one has hitherto failed."
-

1 [Treatise on the Law of Domicil, M.W. Jacobs, 1887; Little Brown and Company, §57, pp. 93-98
2 SOURCE: --

(i) Every "law" that apparently requires specific performance, fees, etc. would be best questioned by the American Individual and responded to by the appropriate governmental agent as to the true designation of its legal nature as part of the determination process that each American most certainly deserves to know based on the Individual's unalienable Right to live free from external government interferences.
-

***
March 11, 2019 - Comment Posted:

It is necessary that "Americans" at least conceptually reconnect with the four Organic Laws as one whole and complete set so the light of true American Law can be shed on the "Constitution of September 17, 1787" by (under)standing the preceding three Organic Laws.[17]

Continuing -
The manufactured nation-wide problem that essentially disabled Americans from fully grokking their own individual and collective relationships with external government is due intentional omissions in the conceptual continuity of the Organic Law. These "intentional omissions" (functioning in a manner of "divide and conquer") were accomplished in a number of ways over the course of about 80 to 150 years or so. Most every modern-day American has been completely indoctrinated with certain well-constructed beliefs about American history presented by the public school system with approved curriculum from the State Departments of Education based on school texts written with certain indoctrination in mind. Possibly the most significant "intentional omission" is the idea that the "Constitution of September 17, 1787" replaced the Articles of Confederation. This notion of a fundamental rejection of the former Constitution is simply not congruent with Organic Law. The Organic Law criteria for this is the fact that the Articles of Confederation were never Lawfully repealed by the very States that originally authored and adopted the Articles as the second Organic Law for The United Staes of America.
-

***
March 28, 2019 - Comment Posted at a Truly Great All-American Site -

Although I've identified with being an American for most of my life it wasn't until I took up an earnest study in the Organic Laws that I also acquired certain knowledge that then dispelled many conventional myths surrounding the notion of a "free country." Anna presents essential perspectives that bring additional light upon the background of the whole of American Law - both the written Organic Law as well as the unwritten common law of we the people. I have avoided identifying with the phrase "We the People" (as it is written in the Constitution of September 17, 1787) because of the questions as to which "United States" that referred to. I had thought this phrase identified the States of the Northwest Territory formed under the "temporary government" of "The Ordinance of 1787." Now I realize that we Americans are most certain ly a "People" as well!

Having access to this website and the steady stream of both Anna's articles as well as virtually all the additional comments has been phenomenal! ... I most certainly send my blessings! Earlier this evening I noted: Anna is an answer to prayers regarding the true American spirit! It seems that these last couple months have especially underscored the difference between who the American people are and who the aliens are.

My hope is that many more Americans will fully realize their natural birthright and shed their snake skins of US citizenship.[18]
-

***
July 9, 2020 - "What the Public Law of this country requires of me."

"... I and all of you have a Public Duty.
That Public Duty requires us to uphold the actual Law -- not to obey the codes and statutes and 'Executive Orders' that are rules for our employees--- but to obey and uphold the actual Public Law.
The Public Law is vested in our Treaties and the Four Organic Laws and in the Federal Constitutions --- all three of them ..."[33]*
-

***
April 29, 2019 - Lao Tzu on Government -

The right-libertarian economist Murray Rothbard suggested that Laozi was the first libertarian, likening Laozi's ideas on government to Friedrich Hayek's theory of spontaneous order. James A. Dorn agreed, writing that Laozi, like many 18th-century liberals, "argued that minimizing the role of government and letting individuals develop spontaneously would best achieve social and economic harmony."[21]
--

Comment:
Re: "minimizing the role of government and letting individuals develop spontaneously" can best be achieved as one progresses in their understanding of three quintessentials:
1.) The limits of Lawful government - (hint: government in accordance with the four Organic Laws);
2.) the individual's Lawful original status (hint: natural born "free-inhabitant" on the land and soil of their original sovereign and independent state with unalienable God-given rights);
3.) the individual's Lawful Right (and neccessity for maintaining their freedom) to rebut all presumptions of any other status of the individual (that is assumed by government at any time throughout the lifetime of the individual) to be any other status less than that of a free-born American.
-

***
March 25, 2019 - "ID" -

If name = nature then what is our true name that expresses our true nature? .........
Revelation 2:17 speaks of a "new name" that is given that no one knows except the individual who receives it. Once one has been given their new name that expresses their true (transformed) nature then would that one still want to be called by any other name that doesn't express their true nature? .........

A number of years ago I had stopped identifying myself with the family-of-origin name knowing that it truly is not my name. The same is becoming true with the "given name" as well. Although I have a true nature I don't know that I have a "new name" that expresses my true nature. If any legal entity were to demand my identity I could honestly claim I don't have one. As far as I know there is no Law (in accordance with the Organic Laws) that obligates me to present any proof of my identity by any means and/or in any form - as long as I am standing on "the soil and land" from which my natural born "free inhabitant" status originates.[19]
-

***
October 16, 2018 - According To Anna -

"... OMG, the actual Americans came home and claimed their assets.....the 'dead' have risen, the Great Tribulation (tribute to Rome) is over, and we come like thieves in the night.

Only we are not thieves. We are the actual landowners. And the Priority Creditors of both 'the' United States and 'the' United States of America and all their Subcontractors and all the corporations formed under their auspices since 1860."[13]
--

Comment:
Anna's article comes serendipitously after I had noted (just several hours earlier) a new question for the National Archives regarding the upper/lower case printing in the original Articles of Confederation document of both "the United States of America" and "The United States of America".

There is one time in "the Articles" where it is plain to see: "The Stile of this Confederacy shall be 'The United States of America'." There is also one time where it is equally plain to see: "... Whereas the Delegates of the United States of America in Congress assembled did on the fifteenth day of November in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy seven, and in the Second Year of the Independence of America agree to certain articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the States ... "[14]

The above paragraph presents two styles of names for two different yet closely related entities. In time sequence we first have "the United States of America in Congress assembled". That is the Congress of "the Delegates" of the thirteen American States that had declared their complete independence (in the first Organic Law) from all of the external government of Great Briton: King, Parliament, Crown, etc. Following the declaration the Congress "agree(d) to certain articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the States" (in the second Organic Law) and they named this Confederation as "The United States of America".

Next (following in this time sequence) came the third Organic Law known most simply as: "The Northwest Ordinance". In the most simple terms this Law prescribed direct taxation of the settlers and inhabitants of government-owned property - territorial "states" throughout the Northwest Territory" and these "states" were collectively known simply as "the United States". This also distinguished proprietary law from legislative law.
-

***
March 3, 2019 - "Basic Nomenclature" By: Anna Von Reitz -

So lets review basics and get everyone on the same page.

There are exactly (3) three names associated with our country:

1. The United States -- a Union of soil jurisdiction republican states.
2. The United States of America -- a Federation of land jurisdiction States.
3. and the States of America - a Confederation of inchoate States of States.

Please notice that the definite article "The" is part of the Proper Name of both "The United States" and "The United States of America", but is not part the name of the "States of America".

Note that these Proper Names are always in Upper and Lower Case. This is how they are officially "styled" and any other variation is not allowed when referencing our country and our states, however, also note that there have been commercial corporations infringing on these names for many years, and they have used and abused these names and applied them to commercial corporations.

Thus we have Interlopers calling themselves "The United States of America" [Incorporated] and "The United States" [Incorporated] and even things like the "US Corp" and "USA, Inc." and so on, that have little or nothing to do with our actual government. Some of these entities are governmental service providers. Some are not.

This means that when people start talking about "the US" and about "America" in loose terms, you always have to stop and ask yourself---- which entity are they talking about? Our actual Union of states or our Federation of States or some go-lightly foreign commercial corporation infringing on our Good Names?

Please note that both The United States (soil) and The United States of America (land) are populated by living people called "Natural Persons" and by "Lawful Persons" on the land. These are all unincorporated entities, too.

Your Proper Name, the one your parents gave you, which is also known as a Trade Name or Given Name, is a "Lawful Person" when you stand on the land, but is converted into a "Legal Person" when you stand on the sea.

This distinction is very important.

If you stand on the land, you are recognizable as an American State Citizen and as a Lawful Person owed all the guarantees of the Constitution, including safe passage when you venture out into the wide world of international trade and commerce.

If you stand on the sea, you can be mistaken for a "stateless" Legal Person, from one of the inchoate "States of States" mentioned above, and known as either a "United States Citizen" or a "Citizen of the United States". Such citizens have never been in receipt of any constitutionally protected rights or guarantees. These "US Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" are not part of the "People" while in Federal Service.

The United States and The United States of America are both unincorporated organizations, called Corporate Persons. They are not incorporated, but they are not sovereign entities, either. Instead, they are Agencies for the sovereign governments of the people (Natural Persons) on the soil and the People (Lawful Persons) on the land.

The United States serves the living people and their republican soil jurisdiction states of the Union. The Texas Republic, for example, is their sovereign domestic realm. Notice the small "s" on "state" in this context. Notice that "The" is part of the Proper Name of "The Texas Republic".

Notice that "The Texas Republic" (soil) is different from "The Republic of Texas" (surface water) and that these same conventions apply to all the other state republics which operate under similarly styled Proper Names and Conventions.

The United States of America serves the Lawful Persons and their Federation of international land jurisdiction States in the same way. Texas is the State representing Texans in this jurisdiction of the law. Notice that "Texas" is just "Texas" --- no "the", "The", no "State of" --- just Texas is the name of this State of the Union.

All the member States of The United States of America Federation are also very simply named: Wisconsin, Maine, Florida, New Hampshire....

These are the States that we are presently engaged in assembling.

These States are populated by Lawful Persons known as either American State Nationals or American State Citizens, as for example, Wisconsin State Nationals or Ohio State Citizens.

American State Nationals owe no service to any government. They are Private Lawful Persons. So long as they don't cause any harm to others or their property, they are free as birds.

American State Citizens have voluntarily agreed to serve their State in some capacity or Office, this may be as simple as signing up for Jury Duty, or joining the State Militia, or it may involve an elected Office, or it may involve being hired to perform a job under the auspices of the State. They are Public Lawful Persons. They enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions.

In either case, Lawful Persons are members of the People and owed all the guarantees of the Federal Constitutions.

And now we come to the Third Branch of the American Government, which is organized and chartered by the People of the States: the States of America Confederation, first organized as of March 1, 1781.

Here we find "States of States" ---- not States..

"States of States" are chartered and incorporated entities created by States, thus were have "The State of Georgia" and "The State of New Hampshire", which are two of the original Confederated States, belonging to Georgia and New Hampshire, respectively.

These States of States are commercial corporations chartered by the States.

Any time you see the word "Confederate" we are talking about "States of States". In fact, all the entities involved in the Civil War were "Confederate States" ---- meaning States of States, regardless of whether they were "North" or "South".

States of States, unlike actual States, are not physically defined. They have no borders or specific location in space. They are called "inchoate" or "incomplete States" as a result.

These entities function in the airy realm of Global Commerce, which is business between two or more incorporated entities.

So the Pecking Order in the American Government goes like this:

The living people own the republican soil jurisdiction states operated as State Republics, for example, The Texas Republic and The Republic of Texas.

Their Union of republican states doing business as The United States [Unincorporated} holds the land jurisdiction States and their Federation of States, The United States of America [Unincorporated], which the living people operate as Lawful Persons.

And the member States of The United States of America charter, own, and operate the Confederation of States of States. Texas owns The State of Texas, and New Hampshire owns The State of New Hampshire, for example, as businesses engaged in global commerce.

Remember this very important fact: "commerce" is business between two or more incorporated entities. Everything else is either domestic (in-state) trade or International Trade, which includes business between incorporated and corporate entities.

The original States of States which formed the primary part of the Federal Government --- the Federal Branch of the Federal Government --- were mothballed after the Civil War, pending "Reconstruction" that never took place.

The actual States of the Union have to be assembled in order for the Federal States of States to be reconstructed and brought out of the mothballs.

This is because only the States and People have the authority and power to charter their own States of States.

And this is necessary because without our own Federal States of States, the Federal Government cannot function as it is meant to function and foreign interests are able to commandeer our business functions.

We have been limping along using Territorial States of States and even Municipal STATES OF STATES, but what really needs to happen is for the States and People of this country to get organized and take care of their own vastly overdue business.

So that's what we are doing, and of course, all those who have benefited from our failure to do this earlier, are aghast and trying to stop us and co-opt us and do everything they can to undermine and discredit our efforts and to keep the People from reconstructing their Federal States of States.

But the stubborn facts remain:

The republican states (people) own the Federation States and the (People/Lawful Persons) own the Confederation of States of States (Legal Persons--- including all Federal Persons.).

The republican states (people) taken together are our National Government, the Federation States taken together are our International Government, and our Confederation States of States taken together are meant to operate our interests in the global realm of commerce.

Please note that only Lawful Persons can operate in the realm of Lawful Money (gold and silver) and only Legal Persons can operate in the realm of Commercial Script.

The dearth of American State Citizens consciously operating as Lawful Persons --- that is, People who are willing and able to operate in their birthright political capacity --- is causing problems not only for us, but for the whole world.

Without Lawful Persons we can't operate our Lawful States and without Lawful States we can't incorporate new "States of States" or reconstruct the old ones.
The sooner we face these facts and get our heads screwed on and our house in order, the better.

The United States = National = State Republics = the Union

The United States of America = International = States of the Union = the Federation of States

the States of America = Global = Federal States of States = the Confederation of States of States.[16]

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com"
-

***
April 1, 2019 - Underscoring "State National" and "State Citizen" -

Anna Von Reitz - Each one of us has to take action to reclaim our birthright political status and each one has to make a decision whether we wish to live as State Nationals or State Citizens.

American State Nationals owe no obligation or duty to serve the government; the government owes them all duty and obligation. Other than keeping the peace and not damaging people or property, American State Nationals are truly free and in possession of all their Natural and Unalienable Rights.

American State Citizens are those among us who accept the burden of serving their State Government as Electors (our version of "Voters"), Jurors, elected officials, and hired officers.[20]
--

Comment: Based on the basic "decision" (presented in the quote immediately above) I am a State National.
-

***
July 4, 2019 - Continuing with "Natural and Unalienable Rights."

"... If we don't uphold our 'Natural and Unalienable Rights', there will be no reference standard ..."[22]
-

***
August 4, 2018 - 3 Men from the Bundy Ranch Standoff Face Years in Prison Despite the Case Being Dismissed

Please sign this petition to free these men who have wrongly been incarcerated.[11]
-

***
January 9, 2017 -

Today is the day after the Bundy court case in Nevada was dismissed with prejudice!

It's a good day to continue taking further steps toward a complete recovery of all our unalienable natural Rights! In this spirit I post the following from Anna Reitz:

"... The first step is to declare your political status, and if you are not a federal employee[29] or otherwise encumbered, come 'home' to your birthright political status as a United States National, aka, state national---- a Wisconsinite, a Texan, a Vermonter, an Oregonian, or whichever state you were born in, that's your nationality. Claim it back and don't be content to ever be called a 'citizen' or a 'Miss' or a 'Mister' or a 'Missus'---- all foreign titles in the Queen's Service--- ever again. You get yourself an official copy of your Birth Certificate and you put together your own Certificate of Assumed Name to claim back your Common Law Copyright to your own given Trade Name and all the other NAMES and variations of names derived from it.

You record your claim of your birthright political status in as many ways as you possibly can. You give notice to the office of the Adjutant General in your state and to the State Secretary of State that you are a United States National (aka state national and native of _______whichever state you were born in) and have retired from any obligation of United States citizenship, whether territorial or municipal. Now it is his business to keep the records straight and protect you and your assets.

Former military personnel--- they never properly mustered you out. When you joined the Service, another layer of federal presumptions accrued to you. When you got your Discharge and your DD214, they never changed your political status back to your original birthright status. It was more profitable and convenient for them to just claim you were a lifelong "volunteer" working for their corporation(s) without rights or wages--- a slave, in other words.

You have to give Notice to the head of your branch of the military that you have returned to your birthright status as a United States National and are now a non-combatant civilian who has retired from the obligations of federal citizenship. ..."[6]
-

***
August 7, 2018 - "Updates on Process" - By Anna Von Reitz -

…

What you need to have ready to counter-claim back your Good Name and Estate:

1. Three authenticated copies (or if not possible for your State, certified at the State Secretary of State level) and at least one authenticated at the United States Department of State level copy of "your" Birth Certificate. These are private documents, not to be recorded.

2. Two notarized statements from Witnesses who know you, know your family, and have first hand knowledge that you are "the" person who was born to the parents and at the place and time shown as the actual birth day on the BC.

3. If possible, a "Lineage Treaty" showing that your family has been in this country since before the Civil War. This is just a simple recitation of your parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, when and where they were born, when and where they got married, etc.

4. A Revocation of all Powers of Attorney effective the day of your birth. This wipes out your Mother's unwitting donation of your name to their fraud scheme and any applications that gave away General Powers of Attorney---prevents the Bar Attorneys from "representing" you and messing with the so-called "intermediary record" of your estate;

5. The Deed of Re-Conveyance moving your Trade Name back to the land and soil of your native State of the Union.

6. The Certificate(s) of Assumed Name that move all the "derivative" variations, permutations, orderings, and styles of your name to the land and soil of your native State of the Union.

7. Mandatory Notice of Liability under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

8. International Will clearly establishing your disposition of your property interests.

All this Turkey Trot is the full-blown insurmountable "stick it down their throats sideways" seizure of control of your name and estate back from the vermin, valid in every international court on Earth.

If they make the mistake of addressing you as a Federal Citizen, you request a Status Hearing and blow them clean out of the water.

Thanks to the work we already did, you are free to assign the BC trust to the U.S. Treasury 1789 from whence it came, and you can go through the additional work to establish your own Private Indemnity Bond, but you can also just tag along and use the indemnity bond established to protect you and your actual State of the Union: AMRI00001 RA 393 427 640 US.

This looks like an "A4V" process, but it is not.

An Accept for Value is what is called a "Mutual Offset Credit Exchange" --- Party A owes you money, but you also owe Party A money, so you "exchange" debts. You owe me $20, but I owe you $10, so I exchange back my $10 debt against your $20 debt and you only owe me $10 as a result.

The Indemnity Bond also requires you to "accept" a Bill and signal that acceptance by writing "ACCEPTED" on the Bill, signing your Trade Name with a by-line, like this: by: John Michael Doe, assigning it to the Indemnity Bond Account, and dating the action. So it looks like a Mutual Offset Credit Exchange, but it isn't. It's an insurance claim.

So, long story short, when you are in receipt of your BCs and have recorded the other documents, you are iron-clad to claim your "indemnity" from any loss or damage.

There is just one other caveat -- the vermin seldom send actual Bills.

What they send are Billing Statements that merely track the status of accounts, and sucker you into paying a Bill that only appears to have been presented. In fact, you've just been told that there is an arrearage in the ACCOUNT, but you haven't been billed for it. Why? Because it's not a bill that you actually owe, and if the rats actually sent you a Bill that would be fraud on the face of it.

This is why you have to demand a "Voucher" from the IRS and can't just sign and stamp any old Notice or Statement they send you.

My comments have been limited to the situations people face in court precisely because when a commercial entity brings an action in court, they have to provide the Judge with an actual Bill. And he has to have an actual Bill in front of him ready to give you, or the entire case is void.

Any failure to produce the Bill on demand --- yours --- is cause for you to say, "I wish for the dismissal with prejudice of all actions related to contract case number (whatever it is) for failure to show cause and administrative default.”

Please note that you do not "move" the Court to do anything. You merely express your wishes to your servants.

And if they do produce a Bill for you to sign, you sign it and charge it off against the Indemnity Bond for your State of the Union.

You win either way in the court situation --- Bill or no Bill.

We are still working on the business end of the utility companies, which are operating in true rogue capacity.[12]
-

***
June 13, 2018 - More About the "Queen" -

"My recent article about the Queen occupying The Chair of the Estates really hit a nerve, and apparently most people in the English-speaking world were totally unaware that the Queen has been occupying a different office other than the one required by The Coronation Oath all these years----though that has to be apparent in retrospect, with or without John Anthony Hill.

I have examined the evidence, too, and it is incontrovertible.

The Queen took the Oath and three days later broke it, on the record. This had the effect of "killing" her role and rule as Christian Monarch and ended her obligation to fulfill the Public Law and her vows made in apparent Bad Faith to the people of the United Kingdom.

Instead of operating in the capacity of Elizabeth the Second, she has been operating in the 'dead' corporate capacity of ELIZABETH II. Her Consort, Prince Philip has similarly been operating in a dead corporate capacity for sixty years.

Her chosen Office since then has involved creating bogus claims of abandonment against the land jurisdiction owed to the States and People of the actual United States, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere, while her husband's role has been to profit from the creation of equally bogus Cestui Que Vie estate trusts, Public Transmitting Utilities, Wards of the State, and similar 'derivatives' that yield among other benefits profit from insurance and bottomry bond scams such as 'Life Force Value Annuities' that are in fact owed to us and to our ancestors.

Every office and entity is dead or presumed to be dead in this entire matrix of falsehoods and illusions. This is very convenient for the criminals involved in profiteering from this, as the dead cannot defend themselves, cannot be heard in court and cannot bring any claim or complaint against the perpetrators of these vile schemes.

Also, in the case of 'dead' corporations and all legal fictions, such as public and private corporate offices, there is no law against any of the most terrible offenses we conceive of. You can murder a corporation and drink its blood, you can rape and strangle a corporation, you can draw and quarter a corporation, you can steal from a corporation and trespass upon it with impunity. You can enslave a corporation and require it to perform in any way you wish.

This, of course, gives the criminals motive to do what they have done to mischaracterize and impersonate and enfranchise billions of people, rendering them all subjects and legal fiction entities in their Kingdom of the Dead---all as an excuse to also pretend that we are not flesh and blood and are not the natural owners of our Trade Names and are in fact dead legal fiction entities subject to criminal abuse and mistreatment at the hands of their henchmen and Priests of the Dead operating the Bar Associations.

Time to break the spell, and become not only alive, but truly aware of the entrenched evil infesting high places.

This evil has been ensconced in the Holy See and in Westminster and in Buckingham Palace where it has silently grown like a cancer for generations, in all the royal houses of Europe it has threaded its web, and those who would not succumb to it -- like Czar Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm II and Prince Frederick and Princess Diana, they have murdered and warred upon.

This is, in the end, a spiritual war, which must be won in the spirit and in the flesh. Only by steadfastly honoring the Truth and honoring each other can we win. Only by establishing our eternal wisdom, strength, resolve, and determination to have, be, and do what is right, can we overcome. We must reach very deep in our souls and accept the burden of knowing how banal evil is, how mundane its methods, how insidious its creep. And we must oppose it with all our will and all our wit and all our vigilance.

Who could imagine on June 5, 1953 that the radiant young Queen, crowned only three days before, would declaim her true crown and birthright? ..."[10]
-

Re: June 5th - In the Destiny Cards - June 5th is: "The Queen of Diamonds"! What's more - the Karma Card is the Three of Diamonds: ("Financial Creativity"). Together these are considered to be two of the most difficult cards in the deck. Robert Camp in Love Cards refers to it as "The Hardest Card in the Deck". The "Queen's" Result Card is the Nine of Diamonds.

But there are two dates referred to here. June 5th is "three days" after she was "crowned" on June 2nd for the 2 of Spades: "The Friendship Card" and with that also comes the 8 of Hearts: "The Emotional Power Card"!
-

***
Christmas Thoughts - From Anna Von Reitz on Monday, December 25, 2017 -

I came downstairs this morning to survey the wreck of my house. Months of ceaseless work and frequent travels have taken their toll: dust everywhere (even some cobwebs!), tall stacks of paperwork waiting for correspondence and filing, more stacks of mail and dispatches, 53 phone calls to return, 53,000 emails but-who-is-counting, and somewhere, somehow, I am supposed to have a life, keep my housekeeping in order, be present for my family and my community, pay the bills, and last but not least, create a Christmas out of this chaos.....

Slumping down on the last chair in the house that was not piled high with packages or mail or abandoned winter coats and sipping my coffee gratefully, my eyes fell on two small books, almost booklets, isolated and alone on the one bare expanse of gleaming table top left: The New Testament and The Constitution for the united States of America.

They seemed so small, so tiny laying there in a pool of winter sunshine.

Yet, a century and a half ago, these were the foundations of every American's education. The most slovenly wretch in the most impoverished circumstance had access to these two slim volumes, and in them, he had the essence of all education needed to live a good and self-respecting life.

You can do without advanced algebra in most professions, and without calculus, too. You can circumscribe the globe from a Biblical atlas. And with the actual Constitution, you can overthrow any throne. Is this not power enough for any man?

By knowing the social obligations and having a code of ethics to rely on, a man and his country can flourish in peace--- and both of these small books provide that certainty and code. They tell us who we are and who we are called to be. They set forth the parameters of life and decency, of self-respect and respect for others.

If we had no other education now, I had to stop---- if we learned no other useful thing in all our days in school, would we not be better off than we are now, when we are lost and groping for any common understanding?

My home in Alaska is built like a Viking Hall, with one large room, and other rooms branching off it, here a pantry, there a bathroom, there a stairway going to the second story, or down to the basement.... or out to the Arctic Entry that buffers the indoors from the cold.

The adornments are simple and useful in the Nordic way, faintly tinged with things Norwegian and Swedish and German. Old silver spoons. Hand-carved chairs made of oak and maple. Oil paintings of snow-capped mountains. Tall bookcases filled with books. A central fire in a well-worn stove with an open glass front where the flames are visible, and the dogs and cat love to loll away their winter nights content to know that the family is here and all together.

Always, though I didn't plan it that way, there is a faint smell of cinnamon and apples and coffee in the kitchen, and a smell of lavender or roses or balsam fir depending on the season of the year wafting around the rest of the household. It is, I think, even in its state of disrepair and chaos, a blessed and peaceful place, where the stress of modern life has been held at bay.

My husband calls it my "magic bubble", as if I waved my hand and created my own world.

This time of year, there are bouquets of greenery and fresh flowers and tall white candles and outside, there is snow and white birches and tall dark spruce trees as far as the eye can see into the woods. This afternoon as we got started on the clearing and cleaning rituals, I saw a yearling moose, soft dark brown, his velvet muzzle raised up scenting us and no doubt wondering about the brightly lit windows.

Scrub-a-dub-dub, I plodded merrily along, and the old vacuum cleaner roared to life and the broom and the dust mop and a roll of paper towels began to work their own magic.

The paper tide was turned and recouped in the office, and my precious little things of Christmas Past, a tiny framed picture of an angel, a crystal star wandering toward Bethlehem and scattering a thousand tiny rainbows in its wake, a mysteriously luminous ivory statue of Mary and her baby, all came forth from their tissue paper and boxes and settled once more in their places like old familiar dinner guests.

And the Spirit of the Season, gainsay it as some people will, came into the old neglected house with its plain-spoken ways, and transformed it into something magical. Though there is winter all around, dark and snowy and deep, in this house there is warmth and beauty and spring.

I smiled at the two pairs of boots standing side by side on the doormat. Father and son. Just as it always was and is and should be. I smiled at the two dogs settled at the feet of their respective men, and at the cat, curled up in a large, warm, fluffy ball waiting for me to put the pie in the oven and come join her in front of the fire.

It has been a hard year for many of us, and yet, simple as this is, old-fashioned as this is, it's Christmas after all.

Please join me in being grateful for all the blessings we have, for what we have been able to give, for all that we have been able to learn this past year, for the fellowship of those who travel with us on this road, for the rich heritage that belongs to each of us, for the joy of being present right now.

Say a prayer of gratitude and then, a prayer for all our brothers and sisters who have suffered foreclosure and prison and injuries of all sorts as a result of a government gone mad, and then, give thanks again for the changes we have seen and the efforts being made to make America great again.

May all our efforts prosper and come to fruition in the New Year. Let the Thousand Years of Peace begin. May the blessings we are heir to rest upon us. May the joy taking root in our hearts last forever.
-
Plus 11 comments[5]

***
The Original Beginning of This Blog on June 18, 2014 -

Have you ever consider what freedom is? What does freedom consist of? Have you ever considered whether you have freedom? If you think that you have freedom - then I am one individual who would like to know what your freedom consists of. If you don't think you have freedom then do you want freedom?

If you want freedom then consider focusing your intention on clearing your own mind(1). The work that you do in clearing your mind is the exactly where your freedom begins! You can begin this work by clearing all your terms!

Your mind is simply a thought factory. Just like any factory there needs to be an onsite manager. Factories may have all kinds of machines running, automated processes, robotics and other advanced technology however, there needs to be consciousness presence there as well. More so with your mind (and for more reasons than I can possibly say in this one blog). Among the many reasons is this one. All your thoughts are creative! They have an inherent creative power imbedded within them that can produce the things that are imagined by the thought. That is a constant potential even without you taking any "action" to deliberately manifest the thought! Therefore it is in your best interest to clearly know what you are thinking and to deliberately think clearly!

In other words - it is in your best interest to be impeccable with your thoughts. If you were to realize that any thought you may have in your mind may possibly produce the thing that is imagined by that thought would you think a thought that is contrary to your own true personal good? I sincerely hope not!

Once you have considered freedom of thought (your own freedom of mind, the freedom to clear your thoughts, words and terms) then consider the outer world application of freedom as presented by Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera:

"What is this Thing Called 'Freedom' in America. According to Thomas Paine, 'The cause of America is in great measure the cause of all mankind.'

Freedom, as the natural state of being for all living organisms including humans, can only be subject to unwritten law or what is called in the Declaration of Independence the 'Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.'

Why There Can Be No Written Law of Freedom:

The Organic Laws Limit Legislation (written law) to Land Owned by the United States of America!

Common sense in legislation means reducing the size of a broken federal government by using the Organic Laws to limit laws to the territory owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. Reading and understanding the Organic Laws of the United States of America would immediately reduce the size of the broken federal government, if the common sense of the Organic Laws were written into the Bills ultimately passed by Congress. You can be sure that few in Congress have read the Constitution of September 17, 1787, as amended and fewer still have read the remaining three Organic Laws."

- Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Also -

"You Can Use the Organic Law of the United States of America to Weed Out All the Bad Lawyers and Restore Your Freedom.

The Congress of the United States and President of the United States are limited by and to the Constitution of the United States You Are Not.

We may safely conclude that neither the Congress nor the President of the United States have read all four Organic Laws of the United States of America. It should surprise no one that the absence of any intellectual curiosity about the contents of the Organic Laws of the United States of America has contributed significantly to the continued broken state of the federal government and the diminution of personal freedom. The Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 and Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 protect the unalienable rights of the free inhabitants. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and Constitution of September 17, 1787 confer certain rights determined by government to inhabitants on the territory or other property owned by or subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America.

The Importance of Territorial Jurisdiction. Common Sense Limits Supreme Law to Federal Territory.

OLI (Organic Laws Institute) supplies the proof that ordinary common sense knowledge of natural law trumps even the 'supreme Law of the Land,' when that 'Land' was nothing more than the kind of land which was the subject of the Northwest Ordinance. The broken federal government does not use regular common sense because the Congress of the United States and the President of the United States are making law for the 'United States' but writing that law so it can be mistakenly applied to people living and working on territory not owned by the United States of America. The 'Land' where the Article VI 'supreme Law' has been supreme is the Northwest Territory. The 'district' has been constantly diminishing in land mass while its population of citizens of the United States grows as they are counted in the federal census and they register to vote.

Some terms to consider -

District of Columbia, District Attorney, United States District Court, Judicial District: Just What Does 'District' Mean?

Q & A

Question: I have never paid attention to the Oath of Office administered to local officials until I heard Bill Clinton swear in the Mayor of New York. He actually used the words in the Article VI Oath -- to SUPPORT this constitution. It of course was oral, but I have never heard the word 'support' in an oath before and was wondering your opinion. I also have a question about Bill Clinton administering this oath. He is an impeached President so can he be considered a public official or just a public person? Is it not a requirement that a public official administer this oath? - JK

Answer: The Constitution of September 17, 1787 is a mix of invocations, alterations and amendments. It invokes Article IX and X of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, so the new Senate can operate as a Committee of States. It alters the Articles of Confederation by adding a President of the United States of America and Vice President it amends the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 to include a President of the United States and Vice President and a Congress of the United States, thus creating a Constitution of the United States.

This mix of activities makes it impossible for one person 'to uphold the Constitution' ( an active role), so Article VI properly uses 'to support this Constitution.'

William Jefferson Clinton was impeached, but not convicted. A person who officiates at an oath merely prompts the person actually taking the oath. The law imposing the oath of office may impose conditions on how the oath is taken. If no conditions are set, the oath may be taken any way that satisfies written law."

- Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

"Knowing the Law Is Empowering!

You may share this newsletter. However, please do not share student lessons. Help us educate Americans about the meaning of the Organic Laws of the United States of America."

Organic Laws Institute:
http://organiclaws.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/OLI-newsletter-jan-2014.html

Thank You Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera!

Wednesday, June 18th, 2014 -

Just enjoyed another great teleconference with Dr. Ed Rivera and the Organic Laws Institute! I'm now all the more inspired to post the following.

Consider "the premise/s" of this book: "Escape from Freedom" by Erich Fromm":

"... Using the insights of psychoanalysis as probing agents, Fromm’s work analyzes the illness of contemporary civilization as witnessed by its willingness to submit to totalitarian rule.":

http://www.amazon.com/Escape-Freedom-Erich-Fromm/dp/0805031499/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1403067426&sr=1-1&keywords=escape+from+freedom+by+erich+fromm

Many Americans have appeared to "love" projecting their hatred against "dictators" (like Hitler) without realizing that there is a whole entire line of presidential dictators that were inaugurated by George Washington when he combined the offices of "head of state" and "head of the government" into one!

Although he was duly elected head of state as the "President of the United States of America" (PoUSA) on April 16th, 1787 he then (apparently) whispered an oath to occupy the executive office of "President of The United States" (PoUS)(2) on April 30th and thereby he created a dictatorship where all of the powers of head of state, the chief executive of the government and commander of chief of the military were now combined into his hands! What more does a "guy" need to be a dictator? (Think about that for just a minute!)

If you look at all four Organic Laws then you'll be able to see that there are numerous differences between "The United States of America" and "The United States". This mini-review could be turned into a graduate level Law course of research, study and analysis!

It is fairly common knowledge that "The United States of America" is a multi-state agreement that was initially voluntarily entered into by each of the individual original 13 states (formerly colonies) and that together they formed a "confederacy" known as "The United States of America" with terms of the agreement known as the "Articles of Confederation (1777):
"Article I of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 makes the 'United States of America' the Confederacy."

At the end of the war against Great Britain the "Treaty of Paris" relinquished certain American lands that then allowed "The United States of America" to become the owners of said land that were described in the "Ordinance of 1787: The Northwest Territory Government" created as a temporary government over those particular lands; however not over the "The United States of America".

Before the States that were formed from the "Northwest Territory" were admitted into the unlon they were "United States" property of "The United States of America". Once they became States in The unlon "The United States of America" no longer had proprietary jurisdiction over those lands that then had gone into private ownership. The new States formed out of the territories were on equal footing with and "confederated" into "The United States of America".

Through the transfer of lands into private ownership and through the written Organic Law we can see that the term "United States" designates certain property over which Congress has exclusive proprietary jurisdiction (because it essentially owns the property! That exclusive jurisdiction includes Washington DC and all the territorial possessions but it excludes the States in the Confederacy (as they retain their Sovereignty) as well as the private land within the boarders of each State.

The Constitution of September 25th, 1789 did not abolish the Articles of Confederation regardless of how much the politicians would like the American people to believe.

Once again the States retained their Sovereignty as the "Constitution" did not amend or abolish the Articles of Confederation whatsoever! The essential task commissioned to the Constitutional convention was to make government over the "United States" permanent by adding taxation.

Equally if not more important is the fact in Law that the people retained their freedom from government if they choose!

After all, isn't freedom from government what the Declaration of Independence (DoI) was all about!?!

(BTW, neither was the DoI abolished!)

However politicians want the world to believe that they represent/are truly a lawful government that rightly has the protection of the people's God-given Rights as their purpose and therefore their government is necessary. What they don't say (and don't want you to know) is that they are actually a business and that they have a ton of "programs" to sell you! But just like any business, "Let The Buyer Beware!" There is nothing in any of the Organic Laws that compels you have to buy anything from any governmental entity (or from any business)!
-

***
October 24, 2019 - The Offices of the President -- Where the Bear Went Through Buckwheat

By Anna Von Reitz

I was in Sixth Grade and had just read Rifles for Watie for Extra Credit, as part of a school unit on the Civil War. For a Sixth Grader simply reading the book, which is several hundred pages long, was a task most of my classmates didn't attempt; I, however, struggled on and got through it. I was just congratulating myself on that accomplishment, when my Mother suggested that I read the autobiographies of Jefferson Davis and Ulysses S. Grant, too.

You may imagine my horror.

This was my first introduction to the Offices of the President. That is, the multiple Offices of the President.

The Offices of the President are all about conducting business.

Any presidential office is always an office concerned with the functions of a business chief executive --- and is not designed to function as a Head of State.

This comes as a shock to most Americans, but, look it up for yourselves in a Law Dictionary, preferably the only Law Dictionary every approved for use by our Congress: Bouvier's.

The actual Power Holder Office is: The President of The United States of America --- that is, the President of our unincorporated Federation of States, our Holding Company that gives its name to our entire country: The United States of America.

There is also: President of the Confederate States of America, President of the United States of America, and President of the United States.

These are all separate Offices.

The President of The United States of America conducts business for the entire country in international jurisdiction, and has wide-ranging power over every aspect of our international relations as well as power over the internal business functions (known as "domestic functions") of the Federal Subcontractors.

The original Federal Government Subcontractors were: (1) the States of America Confederation; (2) the British Territorial United States; (3) the Pope's Municipal Government.

All three were in the business of providing "essential government services" to the States and People of The United States of America.

So in those capacities we had: (1) President of the Confederate States of America, (2) President of the United States of America; (3) President of the United States.

So take a gander, folks --- four different Offices of the President that can be occupied, plus, the Office of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

In the case of Donald Trump, he would be qualified to occupy The Office of the President of The United States of America, because he was born in New York, is of age, and is a landlord --- but to date, he has not occupied the Supreme Power-Holder Office, even though he could do so.

He has, instead, done what all his predecessors since Ulysses S. Grant have done --- occupied the Municipal Office of President of the United States, and the Territorial Office of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

Both of these Offices of the President are supposed to be subservient to The Office of The President of The United States of America, but when that office is left unoccupied for whatever reasons (usually because the incumbent isn't qualified to hold the Supreme Office or can't be bonded for it) it is possible to limp along and conduct business using the two Lesser Offices.

Now the crazed and criminal Municipal "Congress" is trying to impeach Donald Trump from the Office of President of the United States --- the Municipal Office of the Presidency. This is because he has up-ended their leadership's plans to stage a Civil War on our soil and prevented their corporation from making money they had planned to make from bilking us and various other foreign countries.

They, the members of the Municipal Congress, argue that as they conduct the Municipal Business as a for-profit corporation, it is his duty as President of their corporation (and its thousands of illicit franchises) to make profit for profit's sake, even if it involves violence, drugs, war-for-profit, human trafficking, and other crimes.

Donald Trump, to his credit, hasn't gone along.

You will also note that the Vermin are accusing Trump of exactly what Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden in fact did --- colluding with the Russians and taking Russian money. You will also note that Trump didn't do any such thing.

So what if they impeach him from the Office of the President of the United States?

He can step immediately into The Office of The President of The United States of America and tell the Pope to quash them. Simple as that. And the Pope, acting as Pontiff Successor and as a Subcontractor in charge of the Federal Civil Service, including all the "Agencies"--- will have to comply and put a stop to all this criminality and nonsense.

Why? Because The President of The United States of America outranks all the other Offices of the Presidency. It is when an American operates in this otherwise vacated Office, that both the Delegated Power-Holders, the Pope and the Queen, have to hove-to and obey.

We have bonded The Office of the President of The United States of America and we have invited Donald Trump to step up and do the actual job. All he has to do, is reclaim his birthright political status as a New Yorker and he is good to go.

Once in the Office of the Supreme Power-Holder, he can tell Queen Elizabeth how high to jump in her administration of the Territorial Government, as well as telling Pope Francis how the Civil Service and Agencies are to operate on our soil. They are, after all, operating on Delegated Authority.

As a fully empowered President of The United States of America, Donald Trump can issue new asset-backed currency for this country and help oversee the long, long overdue Reconstruction of the Federal Government.

Donald Trump can be a hero and kick the stuffing out of what has been going on in the Municipal Congress and end all the nefarious crap that has been going on in the Territorial Congress as well.

I suggest that everyone reading this say a prayer for Donald Trump and a prayer that he will act upon this opportunity to exercise the actual Office he is heir to.

And I personally hope that he will do so.[27]
-


***
April 28, 2018 - Underscoring the Above References to the Two Presidential Offices:
"Settlement of USA, Inc. Bankruptcy Imminent" - From Anna Von Reitz -

"Reminders for President Trump.....

In order to occupy the actual Office(s) --- plural --- that George Washington occupied and to do what is lawful and right by this world and this country in particular, it is absolutely imperative that you (1) reclaim your natural birthright political status as a native of the land and soil of New York; (2) re-convey your Trade Name to the land and soil of New York; (3) acknowledge, accept, and take the Public Oath of Office to act as The President of The United States of America; (4) be bonded by the actual land jurisdiction government ---- the States and People --- provision of which has already been made with Mr. Mnuchin at the Treasury. ..."
-

***
March 9, 2018 - Link to the Organic Laws in United States Code:

http://uscode.house.gov/browse/frontmatter/organiclaws&edition=prelim
-

***
June 21st, 2014 -

"Verbal delusion arises when words do not correspond to reality. A common form of verbal delusion is jumping to conclusions. We hear somebody speaking and form a hasty and inaccurate picture of his meaning. In political speeches one often finds a double verbal delusion: the speaker believes that his words correspond to one reality, the audience attaches them to another—and both are wrong. Such expressions as "the spirit of democracy," "the American way of life," and so forth, bear rich crops of verbal delusion every year, in the newspapers and over the radio.":

http://www.estudantedavedanta.net/yoga-aphorisms-of-patanjali.pdf

(See the 9th aphorism.)

***
July 6th, 2014 -

"An Introduction to the First & Second Organic Laws
Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 2. Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777":

http://www.organiclaws.org/eds-blog/declaration-independence-facts/

***
August 6th, 2014 -

A comment at:
http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2014/07/30/05-1274/#comment-52692

Thank you for this report!
One of the tap roots in this situation is accessible through the root word: "citizen". That word represents a government-issued status. I'm not a citizen! I'm a "free inhabitant". To understand that requires knowing all four Organic Laws. The second Organic Law is the Articles of Confederation-1777. See Article IV regarding "free inhabitants".

Also:
http://curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=1940109

http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=2065170

***
December 4, 2016 -

Posted the following comment at LibertyLawSite.org:

The idea of "promoting the rule of law" attracted my attention especially to know how the idea is understood by Adam White. It appears to me in reading this entire presentation (as well as comments) that the entire foundation of government is either believed to be or only referred as "The Constitution". If the "rule of law" does not include all four "Organic Laws" then we are not "playing with a full deck"! What "Organic Laws" am I referring to? The very same ones that are at the beginning of the "United States Code", Vol. One. Why do we need to be mindful of the other three Organic Laws? It is only in the light of these other three Organic Laws that what is referred to as "The Constitution"can be understood in its proper context. Most probably the prime example of this concerns government's jurisdiction. Once the limitations of government's proprietary-based jurisdiction are understood in the preceding Organic Laws we will see "The Constitution" in the light intended by the original founding fathers (i.e. Declaration of Independence and continuing in The Articles of Confederation).

Also we need to realize that the government combined two offices of President into one that being the head of State with the head of government. "George Washington ... combined the offices of 'head of state' and 'head of the government' into one!":
http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2181492

I do not know about "reforming" government". I do know that all government employees (including the "president of the United States) need to understand the four Organic Laws if they are intending to support the true and full meaning of the rule of Law.[3]
-

***
January 14, 2020 -

",,,My attitude is that whatever is true, is true. We have to know and accept the truth, or we aren't dealing with a full deck--- and are crippled as a result."[30] - Anna Von Reitz
-

December 12, 2017 - Need Freedom? -

Consider enacting your own "declaration of independence" from government in the most lawful and real way in light of the following article by Anna Reitz.

Monday, December 11, 2017
How Many Times Do I Have to Say This?

By Anna Von Reitz

Day after day after day I get all these complaints, all these awful stories of abuse, all these claims of wrong-doing by the "federal government" and --- every day, I give everyone the tools to defend themselves from the "presumption" of "federal citizenship" that is the "enabling clause" of all these abuses and problems.

I have given you all more than enough instruction and information to remove yourself and your name and estate from these evil legal presumptions. These are weapons of defense -- means to protect yourself and your assets:

1. Authenticate copies of "your" Birth Certificate. Study what I have told you about what this document is and how it is used, so that you can competently claim to be the living and fully insured "Subrogee";

2. Record your common law copyright and standing writ of habeas corpus as part of issuing a Certificate of Assumed Name, claiming all right and interest in all the different variations of your Given Name back to the day you were born and claiming their permanent domicile on the land and soil of the state where you were born;

3. Correct the deed and title of land and homes and other property held in your name so that it is clearly identified as private non-taxable property and rename it under your own copyright-signed designation like: "111101 Pine Court (c)" instead of whatever street or lot and block or other description is being used now;

4. Order "Z" (as in Regulation Z of the Motor Vehicle Code) license plates for your car to establish that it is private property, too, and exempt from federal regulation;

5. Put "retired" labels on all passports and driver licenses,etc., clearly establishing that you are not functioning as a federal citizen now;

6. Check into your family history, and if possible, demonstrate using public records--- births, deaths, census, marriages, etc. --- stand ready to prove who you are and where you come from;

7. Download and print a copy of Pamphlet 27-1-161-1 "The Law of Peace" from the website we shared and have it ready to present if you are ever forced to appear in one of THEIR courts and demand that you are addressed properly as a peaceful non-combatant and non-citizen national of these actual, factual United States of America. Invoke the standing writ of habeas corpus contained in your Certificate of Assumed Name and present the authenticated Birth Certificate for collection of the bounty on the federal PERSON;

8. Revoke your "election to pay" federal income taxes by giving notice to the Commissioners of the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service.

9. Make Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury, responsible to you as the Fiduciary responsible for the administration of the federal PERSON--- thereby denying any such position to the local Court Clerk;

10. Post your own Private Indemnity Bond with the U.S. Treasury or take shelter under the bond established for your State of the Union.

You need to defend yourselves and correct your own records and bring home the facts in a way that these yahoos can't ignore or side-step.

And you need to establish your claims to your own names, estates, and political status.

There is nothing so difficult about this once you grasp the fact that what you thought of as "your" government is just a foreign contractor here to provide governmental services. It's a foreign corporation like TARGET --- with no granted authority over you or your property, but if you don't correct the public records and rebut their false claims, they will be happy to impose their rules and their government upon you.

Get moving. Now. Save yourselves and save your country!

See this article and over 700 others on Anna's website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.[4]
Posted by Paul Stramer at 11:13 PM

1 of 2 comments:

December 12, 2017 at 12:21 AM -
Anna Von, I continue to study the "tools" that you give, but you do not seem to remember that most of us are NOT trained in any kind of law. The "tools" you mention are strange to us. We look at them and want to ask, "Does this "tool" work by it's self, or do I need to use in conjunction with one of those other tools/", OR some other LIGITIMATE question, but there are no available answers. Those of us that have been around 7+ decades remember those that are in jail for being HALF-RIGHT, and we know that we can't go on a bear hunt with a BB-Gun. Been there, done that. As we sat in that CELL, we had time to think, now what was it I did wrong. I hope to be able to put it all together, with all questions answered.
Question: Is there ONE person that you know, besides yourself, that has completed the FULL process alluded to above, that I can talk to and get help, answers, et al.? I am NOT looking for someone to "do it for me", but just for some guidance on specifics. If so, get OK to send me the contact info and send to me at xx@xxx.com. Once I have made contact with that person, I will send you a donation of $100 for, AT LEAST, six (6) months. Furthermore, if I can successfully complete the process in that 6 months, I will continue to send the $100 per month donation for AT LEAST thirty-six (36) months. Yes, I am serious about doing this CORRECTLY.

I've done #8 listed above. I intend to do #s 1, 2, 6, 7, 9 and 10 as soon as funding is available. #s 3 - 5 don't apply to me.
-

***
October 21, 2019 - More on the Declaration of Independence -

"... Adams in the 1776 session of Congress drafted the preamble to the Lee resolution of colleague Richard Henry Lee (Virginia), which called on the colonies to adopt new independent governments. On June 7, 1776 he seconded the resolution, which stated, 'These colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states.' Adams also championed the measure until it was adopted by Congress on July 2. Once the resolution passed, independence became inevitable, though it still had to be declared formally. The commitment was, as Adams put it, 'independence itself.'"[26]
-

***
December 17, 2017 - A Fairly Reasonable Exercise To Watch -

On 12/17/2017 09:34, Private Executive Chef wrote (to a friend in response to a forward from YouTube):
> ...
> I find it to be a fairly reasonable exercise to watch these kind of
> documented videos involving law enforcement encounters (like this one)
> where a man is exercising his own God-given natural Right without
> causing any harm to anyone and who then has the clarity,
> self-confidence and the ego/will to speak up for his Right to
> distinguish it from being ludicrously labeled as a "crime".
>
> Doing that (just as it apparently was done in this instance) is a
> "win" in my estimation!
>
> Then, secondly, I could comment on the city's statue/ordinance
> especially if I were to see it but in the meanwhile the narrator in
> this video presentation referred to state laws so I can comment on
> that.
>
> Unless I am shown otherwise I have to reasonably assume (for now) that
> the reference to "state" is about the legal corporate fiction which no
> one can actually enter or be in, not in truth, only via a legal
> fiction as in a corporatized name. That is why the "officers" ask for
> ID[1] which they failed to get from this man.
>
> This man is my kind of "pastor"!
>
> ~chef
> --
> [1] Although they did not ask for a government-issued ID.
> ---
> Revelation Consultations @ San Diego HQ -
> "Chef-Doctor Jemichel" Blog:
> http://www.curezone.org/blogs/f.asp?f=1785
>
> "Raw Milk: The Whole Truth" Blog:
> http://www.curezone.org/blogs/f.asp?f=1452
>
> "Son of Truth ..." Blog:
> http://www.curezone.org/blogs/f.asp?f=402
> ----
>
> On 12/16/2017 19:15, ... wrote:
>> A well-done 14 min. video!
>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> FROM: YouTube
>>>
>>> SUBJECT: HIGHIMPACTFLIX: "POWER-TRIPPING COP VS GUY WHO DESTROYS HER (position)
>>> WITH HER OWN LAW!" AND MORE VIDEOS
>>>
>>> DATE: 2017 December 16 at 17:45:14 PST
>>>
>>> TO:
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> Power-Tripping Cop vs Guy Who DESTROYS Her With Her Own Law! [2]
>> [2]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GspYU1Donrg&feature=em-subs_digest
-

***
January 16, 2018 - A Good Question To Consider Regarding "Constituting A Government" -

"Why did We The People 'constitute a government' when the People had just got out from under a government? Certainly our forefathers had just got rid of a government and were under no governmental authority. They had seen first hand how a government will oppress the very people who sustain it — so why would they so quickly deem it necessary to form yet another government under which to timidly hide their newfound individual sovereignty?

The indelible expression on the face of History smiles in a grand old glory upon the reason why We The People chose then, and continue to choose today, to 'constitute a "government”'. The reason, in a word, is 'Oppression'. They back then, and we today, generally feared then and fear now the possible falling into oppression by an external government, a foreign government. If they formed a nation-state, 'constituted' a government” with its own sovereignty, autonomy, and authority, the newly formed States could bind in mutual benefit for a structured security in what they called back then a 'General Government'. (Today we call it the Federal Governent.)

That, of course, was a yielding to what I call 'Fear’s Thought System', to be sure; yet while falling back into the trap of government, our Founders somehow managed to create the most liberating union of governments ever devised — so we can forgive them for starting a government on such grounds. Yet we recall ever that the government our forefathers created was and is a 'man-made government', projected by the imagery of dream-wish in the prevailing mental states of the time. There are, after all, three entities which are not signatory on that document called the Constitution — Yours, Mine, and any signature representing the Federal Government. Neither of the three were consulted, and all who were consulted are long dead. ..."[7]

Excellent points; most especially these last two lines!
-

***
February 27, 2018 - Jon Rappoport - Guns: the one-size-fits-all solution is no solution. -

The novelist William Burroughs once wrote: “After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.”[8]
-

***********^***********
Notes:

(1) "Mind clearing" (as developed by Charles Bernner) is a technique that I intend to introduce in this "Son Of Truth" Blog.

(2) See the use of the term "President of the United States" in The Constitution of September 25th, 1789 starting at Art I Section 7. Then see the use of "President of the United States of America" as of Art II, Section 1.

[3] http://www.libertylawsite.org/liberty-forum/a-long-path-to-reforming-our-administrative-state/

In health there is freedom. Health is the first of all liberties.
- Henri-Frederic Amiel 1828-1881

[4] http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/how-many-times-do-i-have-to-say-this.html

[5] http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/christmas-thoughts-from-anna-von-reitz.html

[6] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/01/americas-grandma.html

[7] http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-gaspee-affair-and-sagebrush.html

[8] https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/02/26/guns-the-one-size-fits-all-solution-is-no-solution/

[9] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/04/settlement-of-usa-inc-bankruptcy.html

[10] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/06/the-kingdom-of-dead.html

[11] https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/pardon-remaining-defendants-stood-bundys-bunkerville

[12] See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

[13] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/10/come-on-donald-trump-you-are-smart-man.html

[14] https://organiclaws.org/the-articles-of-confederation/

[15] See: Using The Constitution of September 17, 1787 To Learn The Law:
https://mailchi.mp/1f44e4e2e7bd/using-the-constitution-of-september-17-1787-to-learn-the-law?e=c3224f43af

[16] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/03/basic-nomenclature.html

[17] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/03/virtually-all-arguments-based-on-or.html

[18] Posted immediately prior at Paul Strammer's:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/03/anatomy-of-birth-certificate-what-it.html

[19] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/03/over-1700-articles-in-four-and-half.html

[20] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/04/what-are-states-and-why-do-we-need-to.html

[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laozi

[22] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/07/independence-day-2019.html

[23] https://sedm.org/LibertyU/UnalienableRights.pdf

[24] Why Domicile and Becoming a “Taxpayer” Require Your Consent Pgs 27to 31 of 273
Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry, http://sedm.org
Form 05.002, Rev. 6-24-2015 EXHIBIT:________

[25] One of the first questions that this natural-born American thinks of to ask in the event of an encounter with a governmental agent is: "Do you have evidence of my having 'expressly consented' to your protective service?"

[26] https://www.geni.com/people/John-Adams-2nd-President-of-the-USA/6000000012593135757

[27] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/the-offices-of-president-where-bear.html

Also - Re: "The Power-Holder Office --- the actual Presidency --- is: 'President of The United States of America' ---- not President of 'the' United States of America, and not President of the United States.":
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/dear-mr-trump-31-october-2019.html

[28] http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/not-re-set-re-venue.html

[29] "what stands as a 'benefit' to a Federal Employee often stands as a terrible loss for an American.":
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/11/benefit-is-dirty-word.html

[30] http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/01/want-proof.html

[31] http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/03/the-final-answer-is.html

[32] https://nothanksirs.famguardian.org/Docs/BonusReport.pdf

[33] http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/07/and-all-liars-includes-systemic.html
---

**********************^**********************
Keywords:

freedom, consciousness, America, Thomas Paine, Declaration of Independence, Laws of Nature, United States of America, government, Organic Laws, Congress, Constitution, United States, President, declaration of independence, dictator, Confederacy, free inhabitant, rule of law, Subrogee, common law copyright, standing writ of habeas corpus, Certificate of Assumed Name, We The People, president of the united states, Birth Certificate

(0)
--
**********************^**********************





-

Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!

Print this page
Email this page
  Alert Webmaster

Post Your Comment Here