|
Contamination Lawyer Would Defend Small Farmers
Lawyer promises to defend small farmers
if hurt by #HR 2749
Date: 7/30/2009 1:26:25 PM ( 15 y ) ... viewed 1601 times
11;22 AM
July 30, 09
I like what I am hearing from
BILL MARLEY,
a lawyer who has defended
people hurt by contaminations +
for many years:
He urges the passage of #HR 2749
in a well written OP-ED on his Blog.
He says:
There is a great deal of resistance from smaller food producers, who feel that the bill will unfairly burden them. Here is my promise: if the effects of the bill turn out to be onerous for small food producers – those that sell food to neighbors or at farmer’s markets - I will personally take up the effort to amend the bill.
In the mean time, I urge everyone who cares about safe food to call his or her Congressperson and urge passage of HR 2749. It really is long past time to “put me out of business.”
http://www.marlerblog.com/articles/lawyer-oped/
The POISON FOOD BLOG
is one of his projects.
BILL MARLER ON TWEETER
http://twitter.com/bmarler
I Try not to work all the time - mid-morning at Bainbridge Island Farmer's Market
Oldest daughter was taking the SAT's, middle daughter we dropped at softball practice, so the youngest one and I went to the Farmer's Market - a big deal on the Island on a Saturday. We picked up some fresh strawberries (ours at home are not ripe), a couple more pepper plants and a bag of fresh spinach (I just planted some). I then asked the cheese lady if the milk used was pasteurized (was given a polite glare and a no). I really need to take a day off. By the way, that is daughter Sydney below - she attended a Congressional Hearing in Washington DC on food safety on her 8th birthday.
INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE
FROM POISON FOOD JOURNAL SITE!!!
Consumer Advocates Frustrated by Defeat of HR 2749, Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009
Posted on July 29, 2009 by Mary Siceloff
Email This
Print
Comments (8)
Trackbacks
Share Link
Today’s failed attempt at comprehensive food safety reform left consumer advocates deeply disappointed, but ready to resume the fight.
Many in the food safety community expected to have the votes to pass HR 2749, a bipartisan measure that unanimously passed out of committee in June, but the measure fell just short of the supermajority required under a suspension of the rules.
Pat Buck, the executive director of the Center for Foodborne Illness Research & Prevention whose grandson, Kevin, died from eating an E. coli tainted hamburger said she was frustrated about today’s vote, “Personally, I’m devastated. Really what happened was that some Congressional members put special interests ahead of public health.”
“Congress lost sight of the bigger picture,” said Buck, who points to issues over the special rules and the burden on small farmers as distractions from the larger issue: that we need stronger regulations for a safer food supply. “It doesn’t matter where food comes from, it needs to be safe. No one wants to see small farmers suffer, but right now, American families are suffering and that's not right.”
“It is disappointing,” adds Donna Rosenbaum, executive director of Safe Tables Our Priority (S.T.O.P.). “A combination of things happened here. It was unfortunate timing with the recess. Changes to satisfy certain groups weren’t made public in time, there was a lot of misinformation about small and sustainable farmers.”
A spokesman for Food & Water Watch agreed, explaining that even with last minute changes to appease small farmers many key farm groups still voiced opposition to the legislation this morning, a move that helped pressure key members to withdraw support.
Rosenbaum’s frustration over the legislative setback is clear. “Hairdressers pay a similar annual fee in some states! We’re talking about the food we ingest! To us, improving regulation and funding is a no brainer.” Rosenbaum was also frustrated by the debate on the House floor, pointing out that several lawmakers furthered the “ridiculous” notion that the U.S. has the safest food supply in the world. “I am not sure where they got their information, but we have found that, on a comparative basis, that is really not true, we are behind other countries.”
Food safety advocate and attorney Bill Marler added “Frankly, after a dozen years without any significant positive change in food safety legislation, I really thought congress and business – both small and large – would put public safety before narrow commercial interests. Consumers suffered today because of congressional inaction.”
After the disappointing vote, a spokesman for Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House will take up the bill again tomorrow under rules requiring a simple majority for passage, which will leave the legislation vulnerable to weakening amendments. Meanwhile, consumer advocates gear up for another fight against special interests. As Rosenbaum puts it, “We’re not going anywhere anytime soon. There are still opportunities and we will try again.”
Click to see which members of Congress voted against HR 2749.
http://www.foodpoisonjournal.com/2009/07/articles/food-policy-regulation/cons...
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
