|
The "Nine Eleven Official Conspiracy Theory" Is Undefended!
Dr. David Griscom Wins 9/11 Physics Debate. Three "reasons why the official story violates Newton's Laws of Motion".
Date: 5/23/2014 9:38:17 PM ( 10 y ) ... viewed 1300 times "If no scientists currently defend the NEOCT, (the Nine Eleven Official Conspiracy Theory) then it cannot be a scientific theory, and we therefore need a new, credible investigation of 9/11 by objective, qualified scientists. ... Dr. David Griscom Wins 9/11 Physics Debate - Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing
to Defend the Official Story!"[2]
This is a perfectly logical requirement for scientific theories in general and it is a most critical requirement for NEOCT! Now that the Nine Eleven Official Conspiracy Theory is formally undefended it will be possible for the necessary threshold of people to support a real investigation that can finally turn the tide on this cesspool of monumental deception. A cesspool that now has a memorial museum built on top of it!
***
June 6th, 2014 -
Speaking of which -
"... this campaign represents our best chance to land a real investigation into the destruction of WTC 7 – and in the process of getting there, raise public awareness on an unprecedented scale." -
Richard Gage, AIA/Founder
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth[3]
"The High-Rise Safety Initiative is a ballot measure that will appear on the November 4, 2014 ballot in New York City. If approved by voters, it will require the NYC Department of Buildings to investigate ... the collapse of World Trade Center 7 ..."
Also: the AE911Truth.org "Action Alert" re: this "High-Rise Safety Initiative"[4]
***
June 21st - "A&E Truth" at the 911 Memorial Museum[5]
***
April 9, 2017 -
Earlier got inspired with the thought: "9/11 was a very very bad experiment!"
Dr. David Griscom presented three "reasons why the official story violates Newton's Laws of Motion. They were as follows:
1.) The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was an obvious controlled demolition, immediately severing the vertical support columns, resulting in 2.4 seconds of free fall.
2.) The lateral ejection of steel, such as the beams which lodged in the American Express building, over 400 feet from WTC 1, would require an explosive force.
3.) The molten steel at ground zero was at a higher temperature than office fires could create, and it persisted for weeks."[1]
***********^***********
Notes:
[1] http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/881-dr-david-griscom-wins-911-physics-debate.html
[2] http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/881-dr-david-griscom-wins-911-physics-debate.html
[3] http://highrisesafetynyc.org/about/
[4] http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=4333b9e10a&e=
[5] http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/893-3-towers-2-brochures-1-truth.html
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
