Re: Here is a nice diversion

Sorry - I figured using words as they were defined in the dictionary was acceptable.  Does the same not hold true with "silly" and "paranoid" - neither of which I agreed with, but neither of which I objected to?

I am not going to waste any further time having a running debate on everything I post that you disagree with in a non-debate forum.  After this post, you may have the last word, or last post however you want.

Most major events in history are the results of people getting together and "conspiring" to cause things to happen.  Just because there are conspiracy theories that are way out there does not mean that all conspiracies theories are way out there.  And just because you do not believe something or know about it or want it to happen does not make it untrue or keep it from happening.

If I see someone standing in the middle of the road and a semi-truck bearing down on them from behind and I yell "Lookout - a truck is coming" and that person says, "no there isn't, you are just imagining it or trying to scare me!" then I have done all I can.

What I see coming is a lot worse than a truck.  And it has been coming for a long, long time.  All a person has to do to see it is look.

If you do, here is the train you will find bearing down on you:

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=963026#i

BTW, I don't think "we" blew up the world trade center.  I think "they" did. We just disagree on who "they" are. 

A final thought and this debate between us is over as far as I am concerned:

If you believe that a small group of Muslim zealots controlled by leader who hid in caves could pull off 9/11, what do you suppose a much larger group of the world's wealthiest and most powerful people in positions of control and influence throughout the world might be able to pull off with decades or more of planning?

DQ