Re: On “—Diabetes—“
In stating ML was wrong with the electro-magnetic energy you said;
"Our cells like other cells utilize the conversion of ATP-ADP as the main energy source."
this "conversion" of ATP-ADP does not happen without oxidative phosphorylation, which requires electron exchange between molecules within the mitochondria/cells.
There also must be minerals (among proteins and enzymes) present to help not only with the electron exchange, but also the conductivity.
Read the last part of this page and extrapolate (they are primarily dealing with the nerve impulse electrical conduction here; which BTW, requires minerals)... read the rest of my post and you will perhaps understand what I am trying to state.
http://www.bi.iup.edu/historyofpain/helpoutlineforthenervoussystem.html
Here is the use of electrical charge in cancer...
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=539271
I wonder why that would work? Short circuit growth? If this is true for cancer tumors/cells, what about specific organs? Is not cancer a certain type of cell having its own frequency?
Why are EMFs, microwaves, and such a concern? I think we can see why.
Why does acupuncture, acupressure, EFT etc. seem to work?
http://www.medicalacupuncture.com/aama_marf/journal/vol13_1/article7.html
"The body's energy systems are polarized, with the trunk and head tending to be more electropositive and the extremities electronegative. Electrostimulation that follows these natural polarities, and significantly increases conductivity between the electrodes, will tend to be more clinically effective. Non-needle microcurrent stimulation, especially when polarized to follow the body's natural polarization, can be a highly effective meridian-balancing method."
You then stated;
"Perhaps he could tell me wavelength that each organ needs, it would really help me cut my weekly grocery bill."
Not so far fetched...
http://services.bepress.com/eci/tissue_regen/joan_martin_eci_notes.doc
http://www.med-library.net/content/view/63/40/
Note the reference to electrons and "voltage changes in the mitachondria; um, electrical energy if you ask me. I do not think anything would happen in the body without exchange of electrons and we would not be alive... isn't exchange of electrons variances in voltage?
In addition, read about Olree's work in "Minerals for the Genetic Code"
Then you have this...
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/pr/news/story.cfm?id=1084
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=42211
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/003400.html
Study First To Show Potential of Light-Activated Gene Therapy for Knee Injuries
In addition, most people are aware of far infrared therapy, light therapies for SAD, and the value of sunlight to life is grossly understated.
In response to ML's "For each organ may have specific needs of Electro-magnetic Energy to keep that organ of the body Healthy, which may require specific amounts of Different Alkaline Minerals !"
you wrote...
"More nonsense. As I have already pointed out his use of “Electro-magnetic” should be enough to conclude he has no idea what he is writing about. Aside from that, radiation is something we normally want. It is also worth noting that the radiation the body receives has nothing to do with minerals “Alkaline” or otherwise."
Think about it for a minute, each organ will require a "different" spectrum and/or ratio of specific minerals to perform its function, whether it is making acid in the stomach or bile in the gallbladder, bone, skin, or other tissue cells... as they all vary in mineral/elemental/protein/fat/enzyme/carbohydrate composition, all with specific charges, AND any process requires electron exchange; would not frequency vary? A variation of electrical charge in each separate organ/body system dependent upon the tissue needs, subsequent composition, and function.
You then stated...
"Diabetes has multiple etiologies; it can be a familial trait, the result of obesity/diet, an immune related disease, “Alkaline Minerals” would not be among the major causes."
I do not think he stated that "alkaline minerals" were the cause, but that a lack of alkaline minerals can lead to the diabetic condition.
From the American Diabetes Association...
What vitamins will help my diabetes?
If you have a vitamin or mineral deficiency, it could be causing problems with your glucose control.
I won't bore you with the tons of medical/university studies etc. that bear this out.
And of course there are multiple natural health alternative sites that go into great detail on the multiple mineral deficiencies found in diabetics...
http://www.mineralresourcesint.com/pdf/monthly_newsletters/0702february.pdf
Again I won't bore you with the 10s of thousands of sites, some university and medical, that go into this.
You then stated "What if you eat “JUNK” food and supplement with the “needed Alkaline Minerals”? Since ML suggests that all diseases can be traced to a lack of them, then logically you could eat junk, supplement and never get sick. Now, we all know that this is not true, which makes ML’s idea about the cause of diseases sheer nonsense."
ML has always stated over and over to eat fresh high quality on the plant/vine ripened fruits and vegetables and stop eating junk foods. He has also made it clear that while there may be an occasional need for a supplement due to a specific known deficiency, whole foods is the only way to go as supplements are not absorbed as well.
The reason the body will work more efficiently with a whole food is due to the biological needs at the time of ingestion. Eating in season, and local would provide the body with needed nutrition and increase survivability and health for that particular season and environment; this BTW (nutrition/environment) is what is most responsible for variation in humans. In addition, minerals and other nutrition in the whole food is bound and the body can more easily assimilate what it needs and discard what it does not in this form. This minimizes overdosing on a particular mineral as when the mineral is in ample supply, absorption of that particular mineral diminishes; the body does not waste energy on it. Supplements may tend to "force" the issue causing gross imbalances.
DNA is manipulated through available nutritional intake and the environment. The human then adapts to, or gets sick and dies. Thus DNA is a result not the be all end all. In addition, we are all effected by the nutritional intake of our ancestors. If one wishes to correct or more appropriately enhance their DNA in their familial line, all one needs to do is correct/improve their nutritional and environmental conditions and teach their children to do so as well, passing it on down the line. within several generations both fecundity and longevity will be increased. This is the true answer to "sickness and disease", not science, whether true or false, with all its convoluted misdirection mumbo jumbo.
As you know, I have read many/most of your posts in rebuttal to ML's and could have responded to any one of them in a similar fashion.
This is not so much for you as for those that tend to agree with you... let them do their own thinking.
BTW, I am not sure where your reference to radiation came from in the post.