Re: This may explain the lineage of SS

I love it when they make comments like this:

"Such a complex arrangement could not have been invented twice throughout evolution , it must be the same system," said Gáspár Jékely, another team member.

So the extremely low mathematical probability of randomly inventing the same or very similar systems twice is acceptable evidence when it's used to further the proof of evolution, but the extremely low mathematical probability of having randomly invented the system in the first place is discounted entirely because it challenges evolution.

With double standards like this, who needs science, anyway?