Re: Strategize?

Your claim is laughable...I'll prove it very quickly:

You say "pro-lifers" are not actually pro-life because they approve (in some cases) of the death penalty and war.

But think for a second: who is actually getting the death penalty? Answer: Someone who has KILLED another person. Thus, putting this person (who ends another person's life) to death is, in effect, a very PRO-LIFE position. Restated, a mass-murderer is Pro-death, and by putting HIM to death, you are absolutely being PRO-LIFE.

If a person was in a bank with a gun and was threatning to kill 20 people inside, the PRO-LIFE position would be to SHOOT HIM IN THE HEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!

Same with war. The Vietnam war, for instance, was to preserve the life and liberties of the people of Vietnam. After the war ended MILLIONS of these people got slaughtered by the Communists...along with countless people in Cambodia and other areas. It is true that thousands of Americans were killed by liberal Communists, however the end result is that by pulling out our troops, MILLIONS more got killed. Thus, going to war (attempting to save lives) is a very PRO-LIFE position.

PRO-LIFE is and always will be the perfect description of what we stand for. We don't need your re-definition.

PRO-Choice, however, is nothing but pure rhetoric, designed to cover up your true intentions of allowing death to happen for those who are willing to adminster it. You people are the ones who are absolutely obsessed with death -- not us. You're the ones who'd watch that bank robber kill all those people -- then let him off the hook by letting him live out his days as a hero to the darkside.

this is soooooooooooooooo easy!!!!!!!!!!!! -- it's just almost pathetic!