Re: Effective cancer therapies

Hello,

I am neither an ND nor an MD. I am an environmental and health consultant with 25 years experience of doing research.

Please tell me this: how do you know that the clinics you speak of have cured people of cancer? Have you seen the Ultrafast CT scans of the patients, both before and after treatment? Have you seen patient follow-up records that indicate whether the people who had verifiable cancer have remained healthy?

The clinics you speak of do not have any way of knowing how many people they have cured vs. the number of people who were not helped, because they do not do verifiable testing, either before or after treatment, and they do not do patient follow-up, so they have no way of knowing whether the people they have "cured" live or die.

There have been some minor miracles regarding cancer by some alternative doctors, but it has been inconsistent, and their explanations of what is happening is either non-existent or just plain wrong (e.g., Kelley/Gonzalez)
There is one thing that the conventional medical system in this country is good at, and that is diagnostics. You can pretty much know that if they do a biopsy and find cancer, that you have cancer, and if they don't find cancer, you don't.

They have no clue as to how to fix the problem without maiming you, but that is not really the fault of the individual doctors but the entire system, very much controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, but having a life of its own that rejects anything radically different.

As a health consultant, I have reviewed many of these cancer therapies and their claims ring very hollow.

The only two therapies that have consistent results are Rath (protease inhibition) and Riordan (vitamin C infusion).

Regards
Jonathan Campbell
Alternative Health Consultant
http://www.cqs.com

http://www.cqs.com