>- I sure as hades wouldn't want anything but the best,
The same here, but you fail to recognize that many can not afford this darn thing and that ParaZapper CCa and ParaZapper MX have an excellent track record with many customers preferring them to the full beck protocol. You also fail to realize that we produce specific frequency machines to that we do not publicize.
I agree with using the best when available, but while I would expect the F-165 to be better, where is the proof that it works better. What percentage of customers get better han 30 percent improvement, what percentage get better than 50% improvement, what percentage gets better than 75%.
While I am sure that your claim and theirs is that it works perfect, most here are not going to believe that without supporting evidence.