How can you accuse me of not being supportive?

Look at my last few posts.
On this Forum I suggested a herbal remedy, Tadenam, to someone with prostate problems.
On Shelley’s Forum I gave some info on why pineapple is good for you. I suggested a hangover cure that Shelley said made sense. I described a Polish “cure all”, which she also thought made sense. I was able to supply some info on Dasani that Shelley and Johnnie Vegas appreciated knowing.
On the Liver Flush Forum I gave a recipe for kidney pain/stones that goes back 1000 years.
How can you say the above are not being supportive?
On Master Cleanse I gave some about SWF. Yes, I did once do one; it flushed me well and didn’t cause me any problems except that, for about a week, I was dreadfully thirsty and had a salty taste in my mouth. After that I researched it and decided I wouldn’t do it again. I suppose you could criticise me for not blindly accepting that SWF (Salt-Water-Flush) is good, but if you do you will have to censure a load of other posters – including some long-standing regulars. Even Shelley has posted cautions.
So why criticise me for proffering remedies and info that at least some readers find useful. You don’t have to have experienced something to have knowledge of it, if you did there wouldn’t be any male gynaecologists and cancer specialists would have to be limited as to which sex they could treat, depending on whether they had breasts or prostates.
Tweet