Another Globalist Agenda

The question that begs an answer is this: are these artificial cloud formations caused by normal jet exhaust? The answer is simultaneously yes and no.


The phenomenon known to avid sky watchers as chemtrails has been gaining recognition over the past few years as information circulates the Internet. A quick search of the term contrails immediately leads to articles referring to abnormal types of jet exhaust inconsistent with the physics of condensed ice-crystals formed when hot exhaust meets the cool and humid air of the upper atmosphere. Although cirrus clouds can form from common aircraft exhaust under certain atmospheric conditions, studies of chemtrails done in the U.S. and Canada have confirmed the formation of cloud-making contrails at less than one-third of the minimum 70% humidity required to generate condensed ice-crystal trails. Further documented evidence of this unusual contrail formation includes irregular flight patterns, X-markings, grid patterns, curving trails, U-shaped trails, and contrail saturated skies. Additionally, the confirmation of high levels of toxic metals found in precipitation samples from areas subjected to heavy chemtrail activity, point towards a much more complex global operation than mere civilian air traffic.
What are chemtrails if they are not merely ice crystals?
Sifting through the wealth of chemtrail information on the Internet to discover well-sourced data and concrete facts is a time consuming task. Amidst speculation, conjecture and disinformation ample proof exists that something is being released over nearly the entire planet. Several books have been published on the topic with the most well known, Probing the Chemtrail Conundrum, authored by investigative journalist Will Thomas. In this well-researched book, he details sightings and case studies from around the world, and relates instances where solid samples have been analyzed for their chemical makeup. The yielded results, together with evidence of joint military-corporate projects, have been answered by three main theories on the objectives of aerial chemical spraying.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Aluminum and Global Cooling
It is now an undisputed scientific fact that global warming is a man-made reality, that it is accelerating, and that it poses a major threat to our planet. The urgency to reduce global warming, for the short term, is one possible explanation for chemtrails. The details are clearly outlined in U.S. Patent #5,003,186, Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming, issued to the Hughes Aircraft Company (a conglomerate now called Hughes Electronics defense operations which is wholly owned by General Motors). As described in the introduction "One proposed solution to the problem of global warming involves the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic particles." The patent explains how tiny particles of aluminum oxide and other reflective materials would be added to the fuel of jet airliners and emitted from the jet exhaust. Other aluminum oxide chemtrails can be formed using a powder contrail generation device originally developed for the U.S. Navy in 1975.

While greenhouse gases accumulate and get trapped in the atmosphere, the Welsbach materials and heavy metals released reflect one to two per cent of incoming sunlight by converting "blackbody radiation emitted by the earth [into] heat energy that may be reradiated out into space. Simultaneously, a small percentage of incoming solar radiation is reflected away from the earths surface thereby reducing global warming.

Computer simulations done by Ken Caldeira with the Atmospheric Science Division at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) calculated that aerosol spraying over 85 per cent of the planet would slow down global warming, yet in the long term would increase global warming by allowing atmospheric carbon dioxide to double within the next fifty years. Caldeiras abstract states that to counteract anthropogenic climate change, several schemes have been proposed to diminish solar radiation incident on Earths surface. These geoengineering schemes could reverse global annual mean warming; however, it is unclear to what extent they would mitigate regional and seasonal climate change no previous study has directly addressed this issue.

Although Caldeira recommends a curtailing of greenhouse gas emissions as the most prudent and least risky option to mitigate global warming, one can rationally hypothesize on the possibility that powerful petroleum companies and defense contractors, such as General Motors (Hughes Electronics), have lobbied for the implementation of the geoengineering project in order to continue burning fossil fuels. Could this be why Edward Teller, the founder of LLNL (a research institute contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy and the defense and oil industries), submitted a paper entitled Global Warming and the Ice Ages: Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Change to the 1997 International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, which calls for the implementation of the geoengineering project? Tellers report emphasizes the economic implications of imposing limitations, such as the Kyoto Protocol, on fossil-fired energy production. He notes how much cheaper it would be to lace the skies with light-scattering particles.

According to Will Thomas, in addition to generating profits for the U.S. military-industrial complex, insurance companies would save billions of dollars in profits from the mitigation of anthropogenic climate heating.

Can this type of aerosol spraying be dangerous?

It should come as no surprise that releasing metallic particles into the atmosphere will produce adverse human health effects. In a 50 square mile area where months of spraying had taken place, residents of Espanola, Ontario experienced high rates of severe headaches, chronic joint pain, dizziness, sudden extreme fatigue, acute asthma attacks, feverless "flu-like" symptoms and loss of short term memory. Samples of rainwater analyzed in labs found reflective quartz particles and levels of aluminum five times higher than the maximum permissible levels under Ontario's Health and Safety Standards.

A petition signed by over 550 Espanola residents was brought before Canadian Parliament on November 18th, 1998 demanding an end to aerial spraying by "commercial or military aircraft, foreign or domestic." When the Canadian Ministry of Defense finally replied, their answer was not us.

In addition to producing adverse health effects in humans, stratospheric aerosol seeding could have an unknown devastating effect on the climate. Even initial proponents of geoengineering the earths climate, such as Ken Caldeira, warn of the environmental risks involved. For example, enhanced stratospheric cooling could contribute to the destruction of stratospheric ozone, which protects us from solar and cosmic radiation. Furthermore, the placing of aerosols in the atmosphere could have additional adverse impacts on stratospheric chemistry that could lead to failure of the geoengineering system, thus subjecting the earth to extremely rapid heating, potentially causing a run-away greenhouse effect.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Barium and the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)
Some chemtrail researchers believe that there are multiple concomitant aerosol scattering programs presently being executed. In addition to the geoengineering global cooling program, an experimental electromagnetic weapon with alarming multi-purposes and global range, inspired by Nikola Teslas experiments with electrical energy, is being tested out of Alaska. The aims of the HAARP project are to perfect a reverse radio-telescope that could be used to:

disrupt electronic communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communication systems working
to act as an electromagnetic pulse weapon capable of overloading and disabling electric circuits
to provide radar that can scan beyond the horizon
to act as an earth probing tool to locate oil and mineral reserves
to conduct electricity through the atmosphere without wires
to create nuclear-sized explosions without residual radiation
to disrupt human mental processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation over large geographical areas
to modify and control weather patterns.
The link between HAARP and chemtrail activity was established after the confirmation of barium contaminated rainwater and snow samples collected after observed aerial sprayings. Since one of the key patents for the HAARP technology, U.S. Patent #4,686,605, proposes the release of large clouds of barium to enhance its performance, it is believed that HAARP is now up and running on a global scale.

To understand the link between chemtrails, geoengineering and HAARP, it is important to note that the owner of the HAARP technology patent and the contractor that built the HAARP facility is APTI (ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated), a subsidiary of the Atlantic Richmond Company one of the largest oil companies in the world. In 1994, APTI was sold to one of the largest intelligence contractors in the world, Raytheon E-systems, which is a subsidiary of one of the worlds largest defense contractors, the Raytheon Company. In the fall of 1997, Raytheon successfully merged with the above-mentioned owner of the geoengineering Welsbach patent, Hughes Electronics, making the new Raytheon Company the owner of both the global cooling technology and of the HAARP technology.

Are aluminum and barium (a toxic substance in all its chemical compounds) being released over large parts of the globe to further U.S. military agendas and to fatten the pockets of General Motors shareholders? The general public must demand answers.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. A Biological Warfare Agenda?
The final of the three theories surrounding what Will Thomas refers to as the chemtrail conundrum is even more sinister in nature. Some people claim to have confirmed the presence of biological agents in precipitation samples. Since the detection of illegal aerial spraying operations and the allegedly related illnesses, fear has been spreading over the possibility that we are secretly being subjected to either aerial immunizations, bio-warfare testing, or immune system depressants such as ethylene dibromide and other harmful bio-agents (as part of a larger population control and reduction agenda).

In an article entitled The CIA and the West Nile Virus, What New Viruses, Vaccines and Chemtrails Have in Common, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz discusses how American and African peoples were exposed to deadly chemical and biological agents by the American government with the goal of population control and depopulation. He points out that the CIA and the U.S. Navy, working in tandem with the Army, have used unwitting military personnel and civilian populations for germ warfare experiments, or outright biological attacks.

Many of these revelations have come from the work of the 1975 Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities [PDF document], chaired by Senator Frank Church from Idaho. One such program uncovered by the Committee involving a CIA biological and chemical weapons project with the participation of 86 colleges and universities was named NKNAOMI (sister project to the MKULTRA mind control experiments). The CIA was found by the committee to be involved in illegally storing and testing biological weapons including the development of a micro-dart that felt like a mosquito bite while delivering toxins including infectious biological agents. Horowitz claims that this is only the tip of the iceberg, and that if one digs deeper a global genocide program, in the name of public health and national security is being implemented.

Horowitz claims that the genocide program is known as the Russian biological cocktail in military circles, and it involves the incapacitation and elimination of excess or targeted populations using the delivery of combinations of biological and chemical agents (i.e. co-factors). This makes diagnosis and treatment of these multiple simultaneous exposures/intoxications/infections difficult, if not impossible. Could a lethal co-factor to biological or chemical agents reportedly found in chemtrail samples, such as ethylene dibromide, be a vaccine with dangerous side-effects?

The US and Canada have already stockpiled hundreds of millions of smallpox vaccines. Both governments, using the 9-11 disaster as pretence, have already enacted anti-terrorist legislations that call for forcible vaccination under the threat of internment. Ashcroft has called for mass inoculations by next year. Only the naive will not see that all this comes immediately after anthrax mailings now revealed to have come from a U.S. military lab.

Based on his three years of chemtrail research, Thomas believes that chemtrails do not contain biological agents given that bio-attacks are conducted at low level and never in daylight, in order to avoid ultraviolet sterilization. However, eyewitness reports show that not all aerial sprayings occur in the daytime. Some people, including two of the authors of this report, describe seeing jets flying low and in formation, leaving behind persistent reflective contrails visible to the naked eye in moonlight and in the pink-orange glow of urban light pollution. Therefore, the biological aerosol possibility, as disturbing as it is, remains until every one of the exact objectives for the aerial spraying are positively confirmed.

Would governments endanger our lives and sacrifice innocent people with such impunity?
The historical precedents for such secret chemical and biological assaults on large populations abound. In 1977, the U.S. Military admitted to carrying out hundreds of open-air chemical and bio-warfare tests over American and Canadian populaces. Among the most well known incidents was the release of the serratia marcescens bacterial agent over San Francisco in1950, causing an outbreak of pneumonia-like illnesses and resulting in the death of at least one person. The Church Committee documented numerous similar covert tests that have been carried out with other biological agents and chemical compounds.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE: DOCUMENTED CHEMTRAIL ACTIVITY
Country United Nations NATO Member NATO Partner


United States yes yes
Canada yes yes
United Kingdom yes yes
France yes yes
Germany yes yes
Netherlands yes yes
Italy yes yes
Sweden yes no yes
Croatia yes no yes
Australia yes no no
Mexico yes no no
New Zealand yes no no
Haiti yes no no

Source: Chemtrail Central's FAQ page .
The ten Most likely theories about chemtrail uses - What do they hope to accomplish?
Rated from the most likely (1) - to the least likely (12) / by Lightman

1. Weather modification - cloud seeding to control precipitation. Or to deny rain from a region.
2. To Slow down global warming, patch the ozone holes and limit harmful ultraviolet rays.
3. For Defense applications - concealment from aerial and satellite observation, and to facilitate a ...new secure communications system.
4. For mass immunization without the knowledge of the population
5. To defend satellites against EMP pulses from Nuclear detonations and EMP weapons
6. For an advanced military 3D imaging system.
7. To work in combination with HAARP arrays to modify weather as a weapon
8. For destruction of incoming ICBMS utilizing Tesla and Scalar systems.
9. To work in conjunction with HAARP array to sterilize areas contaminated with biotoxins.
10. To work with a variety of the uses listed above, as this system is quite versatile
11. To shield the U.S. from ELF transmissions from Russia and China
12. As a delivery system - for depopulation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What can Citizens do?
Citizens who want to live in a democracy must be active and vigilant: they must be active to keep it working. This means questioning everything the government does with the peoples tax money. This is called: ACCOUNTABILITY.

To trust wholly the government is to be naive and totally ignorant of history. Therefore, it is important that citizens who love freedom and democracy keep informed and that they inform others. People have a right to know if the government acts in their interests or if it works totally for corporate interests. If the public health and safety is being in any way compromised in the name of the loosely used and abused notions of "national security" or "economic growth", citizens have a moral right and a moral duty to demand honest answers. If these answers are not forthcoming, then citizens must organize to defend their rights to health and safety and to defend the health and safety of future generations.

Some suggestions of what individual citizens can do....

Look at the skies (night and day) and document all sightings of chemtrails (video and pictures). Send your observations to an email list (Chemtrails Over Canada or Chemtrail Tracking USA) and to the Ministry of the Environment and confront the elected officials in your localities to demand honest answers.
Document any health problems. Inform the family doctor of anything unusual concerning your health.
Inform others. Ask them to document sightings and heath problems as well.
Contact your local experts on pollution. Have them do the sampling and testing.
Gather your own samples of dust, fibers and water. Have them tested at the University. Demand also that the government does the testing of your samples and demand that they divulge these tests to the public. If youre not satisfied demand that independent labs do the testing.
Join your local environmental group and organize conferences and information sessions. Keep in touch with activist groups doing the same research into pollution and into chemtrails. Contact Green Peace and ask them what they are doing about chemtrails.
Contact the local district labour councils and get them involved.
Get the churches and church groups to do their share for the environment.
Boycott corporations who fund the chemtrail operations. Bad P.R. will cost them.
Be skeptical of the corporate medias coverage of chemtrails.
Ask many questions of scientists who may be working for the state or for corporations.
Ask many questions of government officials who will try to convince you with their trust us line into being vaccinated. Do your own research. Defend your rights to refuse anything that may affect you health in the long term. Demand the right to breathe fresh air and enjoy blue skies.
Above all stay optimistic: people power will prevail.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Links to further reading:
Information on Natural Cloud Cover:
www.larc.nasa.gov/edu_act/class_cloud_type.html

seaborg.nmu.edu/clouds/types.html


HAARP:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html

www.haarp.net

www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12342


Global Warming:
guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,355070,00.html

ens-news.com/ens/jun2002/2002-06-17-03.asp


Chemtrails:
Contrails Mystify, Sicken Americans

The truth about those strange chemical trails in the sky

CHEMTRAILS CONFIRMED

www.chemtrailcentral.com

www.clydelewis.com/invest/contrails<

www.rense.com/politics6/chemdatapage.html

www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm

www.chemtrailcentral.com/report.shtml

www.moonbowmedia.com/ei/ct/exempt.htm

www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health_risks/Contrail_Controversy_2.html

www.centrexnews.com/chemtrails


Against Chemtrail Theories:
users.erols.com/igoddard/contrail.htm

users.erols.com/igoddard/contral2.htm

www.tetrahedron.org/articles/health_risks/Contrail_Controversy.html


Further Reading on General Motors and the History of Corporate America:
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm

reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_11.htm

www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=405

http://www.business-humanrights.org/Companies-WW2.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Points to Ponder: The Shield Project.


Here we quote the communication from "Deep Shield":

Having read your email, I must say that you are full of questions. These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project, however these reports of biological material being part of the spray should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all of your questions as possible.


1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological material serve in this scenario?

Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider. As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes and travel great distances for long periods of time. Most of the elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not need to spray as often or as much material. Since the suspended particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth suppressants - some of which may be of biological material.

Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and moisture and mold begins to grow. The polymer is stored in a liquid form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has been done which the chemical matrix in past years. Many polymers (plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of pollution. Various formula have been used, some which even use biological agents. It would be great if we could reproduce the same web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.


2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so much of it take place at night?

Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield. There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.

The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier than air and they sink rather rapidly. The different temperatures between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a thin layer.

I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of spraying. I note, it is not just global warming we are combating here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day. This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas. If the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.


3. What other military programs are in place involving the spraying of barium and what are their purposes? Do you know and understand the chemical make up of the element?

A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need to use barium: Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-soluble compounds are poisonous. Barium carbonate is used in glass, as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is used as a drying agent. Barium chloride is used in medicinal preparations and as a water softener. Barium sulfide phosphoresces after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment. Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the subject.

Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of the chief gasses causing the green house effect. In my answer to Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current in the shield. I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge. Somewhat like the current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar metals, such as iron and copper. There are military applications for everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a weapon? The same concept holds true here.


4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails spraying? Or is there one?

To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution; we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make ozone in the stratosphere. Ozone at ground levels does no good; indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air quality is bad. Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of 2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure. Below its boiling point (-112?) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting point (-193?) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen. It is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light ->0+02. Later, in the presence of a catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.

Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric discharge method. Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found. The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating ozone where it is needed.


5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?

Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE. We are relatively new to this notion of terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing, Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life-sustaining conditions on a dying planet. We have never done this before, not intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods. Granted, if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations (or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and permanent injury is not easy to swallow either.

Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding material and getting the most out of each application are taking place all the time. The combined resources of the nations of earth are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored; the remaining land masses are more than what can be covered effectively. The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.


6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause drought?

Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must be maintained. Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide, precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in development and testing which may reduce the affects on precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems with it.


7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?

I do not know.


8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?

There are several causatives for this. Some people are more sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer chemicals. As stated in a previous email, people will get sick, and some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be affected to some degree by the spraying. Without spraying we have a 90% + chance of becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20 years.


9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and One World Order?

Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes, there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this project: European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations.

To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia, England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a nation which they have issues with. Russian planes may be seen in USA skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies. The canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at every station where canister loading is done. All of this to insure that the shield is not used as a weapon. To further insure that the shield is not used as a weapon, non participant nations are sprayed by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is as much a military offense as shooting at them.

Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death. The threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.


10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?

Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a population reduction scheme, designed to kill off 'undesirable' peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield regardless of the consequences.

The same delivery method could be used for biological and chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are better methods that can be used. As a means to fight Terrorism it is ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.


11. Why all the secrecy?

Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying. Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could live to see this extinction take place. This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe. Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of survival are small.

UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no viable solutions at this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of these have contaminated ground water, killed beneficial insects along with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the world.

Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise, any good researcher can find the records. For decades there was public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced. Name a city that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before. All the clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions did not address the production of more factories and more autos. Here an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy was a problem that would have dire effects today.

All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years. Even if we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years. However we cannot stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every household on the planet. Electricity is used to heat many homes in the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark. It is an impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.


12. When will spraying stop?

There are several factors governing this:

A. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels, spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and 2024.

B. Should another method be found which is more effective, less costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project would be replaced.

C. When the other problems become too big to make the maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for this is 2025 to 2050.


13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is the Government backing down on its pollution controls?

Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic problems than they would solve ecological problems. We surpassed the threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's. Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place. The world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being unable to do anything to start solving the problems.

Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that produces a product has a product development program in place. Many of the past products invented came by accident through other unrelated products. There is a corporate drive to find methods to clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been in place for decades, many of the large corporations are in the know when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the problems we face. Take away the economy and their research stops.


14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that this is what is happening?

I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and study:

A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.

B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.

C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.

D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production. Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per individual.

E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars. A little math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions, the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the road. Remember that many autos are the road that were built before present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut off date - anything put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.

F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and 1970.

G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.

H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.

I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.

J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use their different webs and threads.

K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the 1970's to today - world wide.

L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus borne ID illnesses such as HIV) Occurrences of Learning disabilities, including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts.

M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.

N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used. Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize, how they combine with nitrates , carbon monoxide carbon dioxide and fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.

O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.

If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield Project as it really is.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Points to Ponder: Conroy Penner, British Columbia.


Here is the second item mentioned above:

Conroy Penner, of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada contacted me directly with his story. He told me that some years ago he used to work for a certain company in Western Canada and along with another person who was a qualified aerospace welder/fabricator he was assigned to work on construction of some special spray equipment for the United States Air Force.

The workers were told that the USAF contract involved equipment to be used to spray insects at airforce bases in the States. The spray systems incorporated exotic alloys and specially machined parts with large holding, pressure and surge tanks along with pumps. Penner became suspicious of the actual purpose of the whole project as, in his opinion, things simply did not "add up". He resigned after there were confrontations with the US military people and the management over the true purpose of the equipment.

Penner provided this photograph, that was taken in 1988 of some finished spray equipment on a flat bed trailer. There are parts carts in the foreground.





The description states that the green tank sections are coated aluminum and the others are stainless steel for certain other chemicals. The smaller tanks are for the solution for purging the system. The large tanks are some 15 feet long and approximately 3 feet in diameter. The box seen at the right side of the photograph is the control panel, and the plumbing and pumps are underneath the tanks. It is said that these units were designed for use with Hercules C-130 aircraft and it is understood that in total eleven systems were to be made, this being the first.

I have on hand many other specifics from Penner but that is the general outline. All of this took place in 1988/89.


Comments: There are obviously some problems with this - it would be great to have the exact dates along with the names of the company management involved. Also the names and rank of the US military personnel involved is lacking.

As for the equipment itself - it looks much as if it could be ordinary aerial spraying systems - that is because indeed it may be just that with suitable modifications for the specialized USAF requirements. At this time the aerial spraying programme (chemtrails) was in the early stages of experimental development. Certainly at first it was reported that the C-130 was seen being used for aerial spraying (of unknown substances) and only later were the large refuelling tankers seen spraying "chemtrails".


Further comments: Added 26 March 2003 - is an addition from (and confirmed by) the source of the main item above.

The canisters that are shown above are similar to what is known to be incorporated into this programme.

Two large ones are carried, one carrying one part of the chemical mix, the other carrying the other part, when combined they form long polymer chains - threads if you will. Even the green tint finish is typical.

However, the way it is understood here, is that the small tank provides the propellant (compressed gas) which is released into the larger tank. Much like a large aerosol can, except the compressed gas is stored in a separate tank which is much stronger, and able to sustain a far greater pressure than a larger tank.





There are ongoing efforts to confirm and clarify certain aspects of all of the above information. Updates will be made when any new material is available.
------------------------------------------
WORLD TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS



The States Parties to this Treaty

Reaffirming the importance and urgency of preventing an arms race in outer space and of approving concrete proposals on confidence building which could prevent such an arms race, as set out in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55/32 on the prevention of an arms race in outer space,

Recognizing the common interest of all humankind in the exploration and non-weapons use of outer space for peaceful purposes,

Reaffirming the will of all States that the exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon, the planets and other celestial bodies, shall be for weapons-free, peaceful purposes and shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interest of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development,

Reaffirming the provisions of articles III and IV of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, Resolution 2222(XXI), annex,

Recalling the obligations of all States to observe the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations regarding the use or threat of use of force in their international relations, including in their space activities,

Reaffirming paragraph 80 of the Final Document of the Tenth Special Session of the General Assembly, Resolution S-10/2, in which it was stated that in order to prevent an arms race in space further measures should be taken and appropriate international negotiations held in accordance with the spirit of the Treaty,

Reiterating that the Conference on Disarmament, as the single multilateral disarmament negotiating forum, has the primary role in the negotiation of a multilateral agreement or agreements, as appropriate, on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects, as set out in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55/32 on the prevention of an arms race in outer space,

Affirming that it is the policy of the State Parties to this Treaty to permanently ban all space-based weapons,

Have agreed as follows:

Article I

PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE

1. Each State Party to this Treaty shall:

(1) immediately implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of such State Party; and

(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of such State Party and their components.

2. Each State Party to this Treaty shall immediately work toward supporting other non-signatory State Parties in negotiating, signing, ratifying, and implementing this world agreement banning space-based weapons.

3.The Secretary General of the United Nations shall submit to the General Assembly of the United Nations within 90 days of the date that three (3) State Parties have signed this Treaty, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on:

(A) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by Section 1 of this Article I; and

(B) progress toward negotiating, signing, ratifying, and implementing this Treaty as set out in Section 2 of this Article I.

4. Nothing in this Treaty shall be construed to prohibit:

(A) Non-weapons related Space exploration;

(B) Research, development, testing, manufacturing or deployment that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

(C) Civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications,
navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote
sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

Article II

1. Each State Party to this Treaty undertakes not to base in space any object
carrying nuclear weapons or any other kinds of weapons, including weapons of mass destruction, install such space-based objects or weapons on celestial bodies, or station such weapons in outer space in any other manner. The moon, the planets, and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to this Treaty exclusively for non-weapons, peaceful purposes. The establishment of weapons-related military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies or space-based objects shall be forbidden.

2.The use of military personnel for scientific research or for any other non-space-based weapons, peaceful purposes shall not be prohibited. The use of any equipment or facility necessary for peaceful exploration or habitation of the moon, the planets or other celestial bodies, or on objects in space shall also not be prohibited.

Article III

Each State Party to this Treaty undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce any State, group of States, international organization, or other secret or unacknowledged entity, program or project to engage in activities contrary to the provisions of this Treaty.

Article IV

Each State Party to this Treaty agrees to the establishment, funding, equipping and deployment of a United Nations outer space peacekeeping agency, whose mission is to monitor outer space and enforce the permanent ban of space-based weapons under this Treaty.

Article V

As used in Article I, the terms:

1. "Space" or "Outer Space" includes all space extending upward from an altitude greater that 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth, and includes any celestial body in Space.

2. "Weapon" means any device capable of damaging or destroying an object or
person by kinetic projectile, nuclear, conventional or other detonation, chemical or biological agents, directed energy sources, electronic, electromagnetic, sonic, laser, psychotronic, gravity or zero point energy, or as yet unacknowledged or undeveloped means, including exotic weapons systems.

3. "Exotic weapons" systems include: electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; chemtrails; high altitude extra low frequency weapons systems; plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; laser weapons systems; tactical, theatre, strategic or extraterrestrial weapons systems; chemical, biological, environmental, climate or tectonic weapons; weapons systems which inflict damage by misusing natural and space ecosystems, including the upper atmosphere and ionosphere, climate, weather, and tectonic systems.

4. "Space-based weapon" and "weapon system" means any tactical, theatre or strategic weapon, weapon system or component that is based in space, on the moon, on the planets or on any celestial body, or on any object in space.

5. "Object" means any manufactured object, whether land, sea, air, or spaced-based.

6. "Person" means any person, whether land, sea, air, or spaced-based.

7. "Development" means that phase in the evolution of a weapon system or component of a weapon system that is beyond basic research, including the acquisition of materials and services, or the building of any
subcomponents of the system necessary to conduct research and
development, testing, experiments, or deployment outside a laboratory, even if such activities are not capable of damaging or destroying the class of targets against which the weapon system is designed to be used.

8. "Unacknowledged" means an organization, entity, program, or weapon system that is covertly planned, funded, developed, administered or implemented for the beneficial interest of any State or other organized entity using fraud, secrecy, false cover, subterfuge, compartmentalization, and any other means of deception.

Article VI

Each State Party to this Treaty undertakes to take any measures it considers necessary in accordance with its constitutional processes to prohibit and prevent any activity in violation of the provisions of the Treaty anywhere under its jurisdiction or control.

Article VII

1. The provisions of articles I and II of this Treaty shall apply to all States,
regardless of whether such States are signatories to this Treaty.

2. Any State Party to this Treaty may propose amendments to the
Treaty. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary who shall promptly circulate it to all States Parties.

3. An amendment shall enter into force for all States Parties to this
Treaty, upon the deposit with the Depositary of instruments of acceptance by a majority of States Parties. Thereafter it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance.

Article VIII

This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration.

Article IX

1. Two years after the entry into force of this Treaty, a conference of
the States Parties to the Treaty shall be convened by the Depositary at Geneva, Switzerland. The conference shall review the operation of the Treaty with a view to ensuring that its purposes and provisions are being realized, and shall in particular examine the effectiveness of the provisions of articles I and II in eliminating the dangers of an arms race in space, and of space-based weapons.

2. At intervals of not less than two years thereafter, a majority of the States Parties to the Treaty may obtain, by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary, the convening of a conference with the same objectives.

3. If no conference has been convened pursuant to paragraph 2 of this article within ten years following the conclusion of a previous conference, the Depositary shall solicit the views of all States Parties to the Treaty, concerning the convening of such a conference. If one-third or ten of the States Parties, whichever number is less, respond affirmatively, the Depositary shall take immediate steps to convene the conference.

Article X

1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time.

2. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification or accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

3. This Treaty shall enter into force upon the deposit of instruments of ratification by twenty Governments in accordance with paragraph 2 of this article.

4.For those States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited after the entry into force of this Treaty, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.

5. The Depositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or accession and the date of the entry into force of this Treaty and of any amendments thereto, as well as of the receipt of other notices.

6. This Treaty shall be registered by the Depositary in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article XI

This Treaty, of which the English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall send certified copies thereof to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto by their respective governments, have signed this Treaty, opened for signature at Geneva on the ____day of _The Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced on Oct. 2nd offers us the
_________, two thousand and one.


DONE at Geneva on _______, 2001.

Tweet