Science does not support "informational" imprints

> I understand from some engineers that "informational" imprints on water are part of mainstream scientific knowledge

Err - no that is not true. "Informational" imprints on water undermine the very foundations of the basic edifice on which the whole of Science rests - i.e. the atomic nature of matter. If you can show water can transmit information in this way at the sub-atomic level then you are eligable for the 1 million dollars being offered by the John Randi Foundation for proof into such non-scientific phenomena.

I realise people have their personal beliefs, which they are more than entitled to, but I had to point out that what you said about Science supporting it is incorrect.