12 Autism Questions for "Health" Authorities by Ray Gallup

1. Why doesn't the NIH replicate the clinical science studies that Dr.
Vijendra Singh and Dr. Andrew Wakefield have done and take it to the
next level?

2. Why isn't there scientific curiosity as to why children with autism
have elevated measles antibody titers, measles in the gut and measles in
the spinal fluid. Isn't there an interest to explain this especially
when the CDC, NIH, and IOM say that the autism epidemic is a mystery but
then deny a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

3. Why is there a conflict of interest between pharmaceutical companies
and the CDC and FDA as per this article........
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030718-012134-4422r

Aren't these government health agencies responsible to the American
public rather than serve their masters at the pharmaceutical companies?

4. Why hasn't  the FDA conducted any independent, long-term safety
studies on vaccines? If as in number 3 they can't do this then what
public agency can do it?

5. Why hasn't the NIH conducted any immunology studies regarding autism
since it is well known that autism involves an autoimmune component.

6. Why are all studies done by the IOM, CDC and NIH denying links
between vaccines and autism just epidemiology studies and none of the
studies involve clinical science such as immune blood panel tests, colon
biopsies, etc.

7. Why is mercury in fish and broken thermometers dangerous while mercury
in vaccines is not according to the IOM and CDC.

8. Why isn't there more questions about what is put in vaccines when the
product package inserts says it all as per........
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/ingredients1.html

9. Why the denial of a vaccine link to autism when clearly there has
been no clinical science to disprove the link. There has been no
clinical science to explain why children with autism have elevated
measles antibodies in their blood, measles in the gut and measles in the
spinal fluid.

10. Why does the FDA keep a file called VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event
Reaction System) that documents adverse reactions to vaccines and
nothing is done with it.

11. Shouldn't the NIH and CDC be interested in looking into stopping the
epidemic of autism and see if they can develop immunology treatment
strategies to help those children and their families who are victims.

12. Why do the NIH, CDC, IOM and FDA get money if they aren't concerned
about the autism epidemic and they want to continue to look the other
way. Why are they funded by the general public and not the
pharmaceutical companies who they represent more effectively? What
benefit do these agencies give the American public?

Ray Gallup

Tweet