Self Bombing?

London has bombed itself before

BRITISH INTELLIGENCE INVOLVEMENT IN IRISH REPUBLICAN TERRORISM:

The
army asked me to make bombs for the IRA, told me I had the Prime
Minister's blessing ... then tried to kill me: Sunday Herald

British double-agent was in Real IRA's Omagh bomb team: Sunday Herald

Rogue British agents name MI5 bosses in video expose: Sunday Herald

IRA torturer was in the Royal Marines: Sunday Herald

Ulster spies to 'blow MI5 cover': London Guardian 07/06/02

British Protection of Terrorists

Al-Qaida suspect 'hidden by UK agents': London Guardian 07/08/02

Britain 'sheltering al-Qaeda leader': BBC 07/08/02

MI5 wanted me to escape, claims cleric: London Guardian 10/21/01

MI6 'halted bid to arrest bin Laden': London Observer 11/10/02

Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job

Says Israel bombed their own London embassy'

Prison Planet | June 27, 2005

Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state of emergency in America and pave the way for the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.

David
Shayler joined MI5 in October 1991 and worked there for five years. He
started at F Branch (counter-subversion) in January 1992, and worked in
T Branch (Irish terrorism) from August 1992 until October 1994. He left
the organization in 1996.

Shayler
appeared on The Alex Jones Show to kick off what will be a wider public
campaign to educate the public on 9/11 issues and government corruption.

Shayler
again risked jail by speaking out. The British government has a legal
gag preventing him from speaking about his work during his MI5 tenure.
Since what Shayler discussed was already on the public record (a
consequence of which was his imprisonment on two separate occasions),
he now feels safer in stepping back out into the limelight.

Shayler
delved into his past investigations and the evidence that led some
within MI5 to conclude that the Israelis bombed their own London
embassy in July 1994. Shayler said that the Israelis framed two
Palestinians who remain in jail to this day.

"The
same thing has happened with two Palestinians who were convicted of
conspiracy to cause the attack on the Israeli Embassy in Britain in
1994 but MI5 didn't disclose two documents which indicated their
innocence. One document indicated another group had carried out the
attack and the other document was the belief of an MI5 officer that the
Israelis had actually bombed their own embassy and allowed a controlled
explosion to try and get better security and these documents were never
shown to the trial judge let alone the defense."

Shayler
said that his suspicions were first aroused about 9/11 when the usual
route of crime scene investigation was impeded when the debris was
immediately seized and shipped off to China.

"It
is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene and yet
in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is shipped out to
China, there are no forensications done on that metal. Now that to me
suggests they never wanted anybody to look at that metal because it was
not going to provide the evidence they wanted to show people that it
was Al-Qaeda."

Shayler then went on to dismiss the incompetence theory.

"The
more I look at it, you realize that it's not incompetence. There were
FBI officers all over the country, Colleen Rowley is obviously the one
who managed to get a congressional hearing, but there was plenty of
evidence certainly."

"There
are so many questions that need to be answered, protocols being
overridden within national defense, people actively being stopped from
carrying out investigations. This wasn't an accident, they were aware
there was intelligence indicating those kind of attacks, there were FBI
intercepts saying it in the days before the attacks. When you look at
it all, that is a big big intelligence picture and yet these people
were crucially stopped from doing their jobs, stopped from trying to
protect the American people."

Shayler
elaborated by saying the evidence suggests the attack was originally
meant to be much wider in scope and was an attempt at a violent coup
intended to decapitate the entire government as a pretext for martial
law.

"So you're looking
at a situation in which you almost have a coup de'tat because you've
got to bear in mind that there were weapons discovered on planes that
didn't take off on 9/11. Now people have obviously postulated that they
were going perhaps to attack the White House, Capitol Hill. That looks
to me like an attempt to destroy American government and declare a
state of emergency, in fact a coup de'tat, a violent coup de'tat."

"There
are so very many questions about this and you realize again that none
of the enquiries ever get to the bottom of any of these things, they
don't take all the evidence, they don't often take any evidence under
oath when they should be taking it under oath."

Shayler
was forthright in his assertion that the attack was planned and
executed within the jurisdiction of the military-industrial complex.

"They
let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be able to
allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and of course
what they're trying to do now is the same thing with the invasion of
Iran and Syria."

Shayler
ended by questioning the highly suspicious nature of the collapse of
the twin towers and Building 7, the first buildings in history, all in
the same day, to collapse from so-called fire damage alone.

"I've
seen the results of terroristic explosions and so on and no terrorist
explosion has ever brought down a building. When the IRA put something
like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in front of the Baltic
Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the bomb, all the glass
came out, the building shook a bit but there was no question about the
building falling down and it doesn't obey the laws of physics for
buildings to fall down in the way the World Trade Center came down. So
you have the comparison of the two, Building 7 compared with the north
and south towers coming down and those two things are exactly the same,
they were demolished."

David
Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who share the
same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former Chief
Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's
first term Morgan Reynolds publicly questioned
the unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7 earlier this month. In
addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President
Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns

last week when he said the Bush Administration were making the same
mistakes as the Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of Winter.
Roberts seriously doubts the official explanation behind 9/11.

Click here for a clip in which Shayler discusses 9/11. Prison Planet.tv subscribers can listen to the whole hour long interview by clicking here.
Shayler also discusses his investigations of Irish Republican terrorism
which led back to the British government and the murder of Princess
Diana.