Re: Google is not innocent???

*sigh*

It is perhaps with some degree of regret that we can look back at the initial heavy-handedness expressed there. Perhaps we could start by re-stating in more flowery terms the posting guidelines or something. Perhaps netav's remarks would have been a better target, given that he continued the one thread. Woulda, coulda, shoulda, whatever. Etc., etc., etc.

We've seen enough "innocent" posts from all sides of the Christianity issue. So forgive us, please, for jumping on this one.

However...

Could we just move on from it?

I'm not going to fawn all over you any more than I already have to try to convince you that I've appreciated your posts -- it makes me feel cheap, and, frankly, you haven't earned it yet, newbie. *giggle* At no time was there any intent to censor your comments in this forum, despite the obvious absence of one of your posts. (If I'd spent half an hour on a post, I'd be a bit peeved, too.)

If it's any consolation, I've had my early posts edited once or twice, and I've been criticized for being a bit too caustic when I didn't need to be.

=-John-=