Re: Modern Medicine:The New World Religion

...................ZAPPING THE ZAPPERS............................

People are manipulated by their childish fears and hopes as is said in the above article. Those who choose chemotherapy are led to believe that a little extra chemotherapy will "zap" any "stray," microscopic cancer cells lingering after surgery or after extensive and exhausting chemotherapy already done.

Yet, if someone else uses the word, "zap" in the context of an alternative to chemotherapy, it is immediately made fun of and put in quotes as if, somehow, that proves it doesn't work. For these people putting a word in quotation marks is all the evidence they have to prove it doesn't work. For these people with big brains that is all the evidence they need. Do these enthusiasts of chemotherapy have a patent on the word "zap?"

Why is it silly to be used in connection with H. Clark's Zapper but o.k. when used in connection with zapping cancer cells through chemotherapy or radiation?

Most people would rather lie down passively and let themselves be injected or infused with chemotherapy rather than look further and search out positive things they can do for their health whether they have cancer or not. And they want to stand in the way of someone else doing something positive for his or her health as evidenced by the FTC's current investigation of health web sites.
Is cleansing your liver or trying out a Clark remedy or using a zapper, p 0 r n o g r a p h y to be protected from by it?

People, like children, want a quick fix NOW! So they turn to chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. They do not remove the underlying causes. That takes time. Like a demanding child that wants a toy right now, they want that cancer cure NOW.

People have childish fears that something untold will happen if they read about alternative treatments. They don't even know what they are. They have blind faith that the FTC knows all about every aspect of alternative treatments to the commonplace, the ordinary, the conventional therapies: chemotherapy, radiation, surgery. The Blind leading the Blind.

If people are more interested in finding out how these alternatives to conventional therapy work, why don't they go and talk to the people who used them? That's something everyone can do. Does everyone have a phone to see if anyone survived H. Clark's zapper? Can the FTC be called upon to do this and will you be satisfied that they went about their investigation the way you would have done it? If there are people alive after using it, what's the big deal?

There are people alive after using chemotherapy--despite using it--and not because of using it. What's the big deal in this miracle? There were people alive after Hiroshima, too. Some always survive. Just like germs. Those who are not childish but brave enough look at all sides of this issue will remove the underlying causes. They will survive the longest.
Tweet