I'm not referring to contradictions within the bible one bit, i'm open minded enough to assume that many of those 'contradictions' may simply be translation errors. I'm referring to the contradictions between any point of view that is not described when looking at the bible in a fundamentalist manner. read the quote i posted again. basically the article is trying to compare other religios beliefs with the bible. but it's point of view and PROOF, is that 'it's not the bible, so it it is nothing the devils dogma'.
my question was mainly what's the point of stuff like this? afterall, everybodies heard the line 'the bible's right, nothing else' yada yada.