CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Australian Study Shows Chemotherapy Adds 2% to Survival Statistics
 
beloved1 Views: 2,303
Published: 18 y
Status:       R [Message recommended by a moderator!]
 
This is a reply to # 338,486

Re: Australian Study Shows Chemotherapy Adds 2% to Survival Statistics


Oncs generally use relative stats. If you chose to buy 1% milk instead of 2%, you could say that you were reducing your fat from milk by 50% (relative) or by 1% absolute.

Now use this figure with cancer. If cancer A has 2% survival (2 out of 100), and chemo raises it to 3% (3 out of 100), few would consider the odds worth the horrible cost, ot to mention the high possability of premature death. The onc is not lying when he says that the chemo for cancer A improves survival by 50%, however, he is puting a very positive spin on rather bleak news.

Now of course, if the no-chemo survival was 40%, then a 50% increase is significant even though it is relative, since an extra 20 people of 100 will survive, but you will find few chemos with such results.

Also, "survival" generally refers to 5 years. Many "survivors" of chemo actually die from the cancer.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.078 sec, (1)