Live Blood Cell Analysis versus Candida Blood Culture

So I went to see two doctors, a conventional and integrative one. The integrative one says I have fungus in my blood, by taking a prick of my fingertip and putting the blood under a darkfield microscope and diagnoses me using the popular alternative method "live blood cell analysis". She says I have candida in my blood. Then, I went to see my conventional doctor, who ran a blood culture for any yeast in the blood and it came back negative. He says that any bacteria or yeast in the blood would result in severe fever and that it would be extremly debilitating, to the point that I wouldn't be able to talk or even type this. So it seems to me their conclusions are very contradictory to each other. Can anyone explain why this is or which is lying/misinformed?