Re: ..annoying bashers can't follow arguments..

Ever notice how often bashers will present an argument against some alternative method like Clark's and when asked to explain will leap onto another argument entirely? Never reading nor answering the questions asked of them on their original argument.

How can a person die of a belief? If he or she sits in a chair and doesn't eat and move, eventually starvation will kill that person. The thought control police would like to generalize that argument to include just thinking certain thoughts will kill you. But only if that thinking includes good thoughts on alternative medicine. This is impossible. But that doesn't matter to the thought police. Where is the scientific experiment that proves this grandiose statement (that thinking your belief will kill you)?

Regarding one paragraph. This group that cool zone belongs to is always demanding scientific proof from others (alternative methods practitioners) but they don't have any to substantiate their own claims.

This Danish woman is used as an example of some who did not use traditional, toxic cancer therapy and she died because of that.
But he left out the MILLIONS ALL OVER THE WORLD who died because they used traditional, toxic cancer therapy. Or, if you prefer to believe, the cancer killed them because the traditional, toxic cancer therapy did not help them. Why must we be forced to accept his conclusions based on one woman who died, and ignore them if they die using traditional therapy? Why must we be forced to think its allright to die from cancer as long as you went through the traditional toxic cancer tretament they call therapy?

Who are the people on the Danish t.v. management? Conflict of interest there or not?
DR Management
The Danish Broadcasting Corporation is headed by a Board of 10 members elected for a four-year period. Three members, incl. the chairman is selected by the minister of cultural affairs, six by Parliament and one by the employees of DR.

Tweet