Where do breediots get the right to impose unnecessary risk, suffering and death, without consent?
This question is a “check mate” for every breeding dipshit. Because they must expose themselves to be sadomasochists in order to honestly answer any part of it. Ability doesn’t equal right. Life isn’t necessary. And consent matters. Breeders have no rational or ethical/moral response to any of this. Pro life = pro suffering. It’s all or nothing. The only thing a parent can guarantee their child, is that they’ll suffer and die, pointlessly. If one considers themselves empathetic, it is this fact alone that they must refuse to recognize because they subconsciously know it completely destroys any feelings of entitlement towards procreation.
Breediots are so needy that they look down on people just minding their own business because they don't care to entertain them. This life is so horrible that breeders cope by looking for constant entertainment/stimulation from others. It's the main reason breeders have children...