CureZone   Log On   Join
Image Embedded Clark zappers work much better than Beck.
 
parazapper Views: 1,334
Published: 7 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,367,463

Clark zappers work much better than Beck.


It is so sad that you are almost as bad as ---. You completely distort the truth by omitting the fact that the only people in the study were ones who had failed the nutritional only study.

In the report, he specifically stated " had not completely responded to previous nutritional intervention," and that "The natural control group met the same criteria during the twelve month time period trial."

He also so stated "48.2% reported substantial symptomatic improvement (between 75% improvement to complete remission)" while " In the control group, the average control also had 1.1 chronic infections; 12.9% reported significant improvement,"

So, that is 48 percent in the group who used the zapper compared to 12.9 percent of those who did not use a zapper. That is close to a 4 times improvement.

He also stated the some users only use the zapper for 1 session. Even Dr. Clark stated that 1 session was not enough.

There is no independent study ever made to show that Beck ever worked at all.

If you have to lie to promote a product, then what you are promoting must not be very good.


http://huldaclarkparazapper.com/cart/images/Water_zapping_jars_b_051517_med.jpg?mv_pc=cz  

 




 

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.096 sec, (1)