zapping jars of pond water and other zapper tests

zapping jars of pond water and other tests.

I have been asked several times to elucidate the process of zapping microbes in water, basically, how to recreate the jars of pond water experiment that I sometimes display.

The process is fairly simple.

1) find a source of contaminated water. This can be more problematic than it sounds. The water needs to have a high microbial content but should be able to be clear if filtered. That is the water should not be highly stained organically or otherwise.

2) You will need clear jars, zapper, electrodes, wiring, alligator clips, camera for recording the changes, microscope and associated equipment such as slides. Also helpful is a notebook for keeping records and observations.

3) Fill at least 2 jars for each mode that you wish to test. You may want to use 2 jars for each frequency. One jar of each pair is a control and is to be left as it is, not zapped or treated in any way. It should be kept covered to prevent contamination. The other jar of each pair is the test jar and that is the one to be zapped with either a single frequency or a full mode according to what you are trying to test.

4) The electrode that you chose is important. Titanium is best but very expensive. Copper and aluminum can contaminate the water with toxic metals that affect the results. Silver is known to be anti-microbial so it is out. Brass will leech some copper.

5) Prepare the samples, place the electrodes into them, cover, and zap. It is important to keep the jars covered to prevent new contamination. Remove the electrodes after you have finished zapping to minimize metal contamination which can affect results. It is ideal to log each action into a notebook, including date and time.

Important data to collect is:

type of waveform used
voltage of the wave
frequency of the waveform
time that the signal is applied
time that the signal is removed
temperature of the water
it might also be a good idea to record the pH of the water at both start and end.
it might also be a good idea to record the conductivity of the water at both start and end.


Over the years, I have run this test many times. Originally, I used a culture, referred to a s infusoria. This is basically, some timothy hay that is cut up and placed in clear clean, non-chlorinated water and in a few days, masses of microbes are present. I have also even made samples that grow microbes using little more than a couple of vitamin pills dissolved in the water.

There are many variations that can be tried.

zap the sample for 1 minute at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 3 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 5 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 7 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 10 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 15 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 20 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 30 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 45 minutes at a specific frequency
zap the sample for 60 minutes at a specific frequency

There is a minimum time that it takes to start killing microbes.
There is also a time that will be reached that produces diminishing returns, that is at a single frequency, no more microbes are killed.
After running a few of these tests, you will notice that there is probably some optimum time to run any specific frequency in order to produce good results.

Also, re-observe the samples after 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours and notice how long it takes for the microbes to recover if they do.

Then try using a second frequency and observing the effects that it has on any remaining microbes.

Notice any differences that occur when using a third frequency, 4th, and so on.

In the Jar of pond water test that we did, several different zappers were used for purposes of comparison. We even used a 9 volt battery that was connected to the electrodes as a DC signal. The results can be seen at: //www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2111535#i .

The regular zappers did produce results that were slightly better than the jar with just the battery.

If you would like any additional information, just ask.
Tweet