Re: Zika Hoax: Strategy of Liars, House of Cards
Zika virus is a joke just like H1N1,SARS. MERS, EBOLA, SWINE FLU, ASIAN, FLU, EV-D68, BIRD FLU, WEST NILE. Where are all the medical miracles that were suppose to have manifested from all the US taxpayers money funneled to various research groups, the CDC and pharma? Your pictures are no more than fear mongering. This is just another exercise in getting US taxpayer money-not to find a cure or treatment because none of these so called epidemic have ever resulted in one-but to 1. keep the world population in a state of fear. People who are afraid are easier to control. 2. to get MONEY.
To get to the point this is from an article written by James Grundvig: The Zika Breach of Public Trust: The Wealth Transfer Model From U.S. Taxpayers to Big Pharma
CDC’s Hijacking of Science
At the end of May, a new scientific study, “Zika and the Risk of Microcephaly,” was published in The New England Journal of Medicine (Johansson, M.A., et al.). The research scientists wrote:
Polynesia estimated that the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV [Zika Virus] infection in the first trimester of pregnancy was 0.95 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 1.91), on the basis of eight microcephaly cases identified retrospectively in a population of approximately 270,000 people with an estimated rate of ZIKV infection of 66 percent.
Well, 0.95 percent—less than 1 percent—does not make a global pandemic. Add that lowly figure for the Tahiti strain of the virus with witness accounts in the Brazilian field labs, combined with the previous three false pandemics announced by the WHO, and the pattern of political abuse of public trust reaching for a massive wealth transfer from U.S. taxpayers to Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers is not the only disturbing trend.
What is missing from this crisis is a full-blown investigation on the potential triggers for microcephaly in that part of the world. It begins with a list of suspects and plows through a process of elimination to shorten that list until the culprits are identified.
By narrowly defining the microcephaly research only around the Zika virus is a failure of scientific duty for three global health care agencies that are supposed to report the facts on their findings. This is their false narrative.
When pressed to provide answers, both CDC and NIH did not respond to comment. When the WHO was contacted, they merely emailed its Zika page. When probed further about microcephaly, the WHO Media Team sent a much smaller page on the birth defect disease, while refusing to answer any question to why the people of Brazil and the Americas are not better represented when it comes to a pandemic.
--------------------------------
"The first major outbreak of Zika virus occurred in April and May 2007 on Yap island, a part of the Federated States of Micronesia in the South Pacific. Of the island’s 7,400 residents, antibodies against Zika were found in 74 percent of the population. No deaths were attributed to ZIKA, and none of the patients were hospitalized. Long-term nerve damage known as Guillaine-Barre Syndrome was reported. In the following year, local health workers reported an increase in cases of microcephaly in newborns, a claim disputed in other reports.
The Yap outbreak was an extraordinary phenomenon for several reasons. Over the past 60 years since its discovery by the Rockefeller Institute in a monkey in the Zika Valley of Uganda, only 14 cases in humans had been reported. The distance from the coast of East Africa to Yap is 11,000 kilometers, and not a single resident of Yap had ever visited Africa. A few Filipinos, presumably medical workers, had contact with Zika virus, but none were reported in Yap.
-CDC-Oxford ‘Death Gene’ Is Key To The Brazilian Babies Riddle
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/02/cdc-oxford-death-gene-is-key-to-the-brazilian-babies-riddle/
-Genewashing Zika: The Cover-up of Biotech’s Dirty War
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/02/genewashing-zika-the-cover-up-of-biotechs-dirty-war/
-Gene Warfare on Brazil Infants Has Roots in an African Lab
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/02/gene-warfare-on-brazil-infants-has-roots-in-an-african-lab/.
-Who Owns Zika Virus? Rockefeller Found…
http://www.4thmedia.org/2016/02/who-owns-the-zika-virus-the-rockefeller-foundation/
-Brazilian Study Unable to Determine Causal Link Between Zika and Brain Disorders
http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/04/brazilian-study-unable-to-determine-causal-link-between-zika-and-brain-disorders/
If the CDC & the WHO, who are the front runners in this new fake epidemic were so concerned about "microcephaly" why haven’t they tied to determine why 25,000 babies in the US are born with some degree of it in the US? NO ZIKA INVOLVED.
“Practice Parameter: Evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review)”;
Neurology 2009 Sep 15; 73(11) 887-897; Report of the Quality Standards. Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.
Here’s the money quote:
“Microcephaly may result from any insult that disturbs early brain growth…Annually, approximately 25,000 infants in the United States will be diagnosed with microcephaly…”
Newest issue. There has been an increase in Anencephaly in Washington State; This is a cranial birth defect where a child is born with no brain, a partial brain or a brain stem.
Between January 2010 and January 2016, 42 babies were confirmed with anencephaly in Yakima, Benton and Franklin counties. These are higher rates than average:
http://www.doh.wa(dot)gov/YouandYourFamily/IllnessandDisease/BirthDefects/AnencephalyInvestigation.
How the state is missing chances to find deadly birth defect’s cause
http://www.seattletimes(dot)com/seattle-news/health/birth-defects-mystery-how-state-is-missing-clues-to-solve-a-deadly-problem/ one stands out:…"although no definite causal link has been established between Zika and microcephaly we believe there is". They can believe in the tooth fairy doesn't make it true.
Correlation is not causation. Even on the basis of correlation, nowhere in any of the studies produced do we see anything approaching a high degree of association. You would expect to find evidence that in, say, 80 or 90 percent of cases, the Zika virus was found in babies who developed the defect. That evidence isn’t there. Well, how about a 90-percent correlation between microcephaly in the baby and Zika found in the mother? Not there, either. Again, not even close.
Let’s not forget the increasing number of babies being born with Anencephaly in Washington State. 25.000 cases of “Microcephaly in the US and increasing number of cases on anencephaly not reported on in the US. Why? It doesn’t fit the current epidemic scenario.
Between January 2010 and January 2016, 42 babies were confirmed with anencephaly in Yakima, Benton and Franklin counties. These are higher rates than average. The Department of Health is doing an investigation to understand why.http://www.doh.wa.gov/YouandYourFamily/IllnessandDisease/BirthDefects/AnencephalyInvestigation
Surge in babies born without brains in Washington State
http://www.naturalnews.com/044182_birth_defects_anencephaly_Washington_State.html
Rare Birth Defects Still Spiking in Washington State
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/rare-birth-defects-still-spiking-washington-state-n86916
Mysterious cluster of birth defects stumps doctors
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/01/health/cohen-birth-defects/index.html
How the state is missing chances to find deadly birth defect’s cause
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/birth-defects-mystery-how-state-is-missing-clues-to-solve-a-deadly-problem/.
Do you know what the common denominator in the increase in cranial birth defects in both countries is: PESTICIDES.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler (vaccine reaction)
July 1, 2016 at 12:39 am
I have it on good authority that (1) Microcephaly surge started in Brazil before Zika arrived; (2) the surge started a year after the mandated “Stork” pre-natal program (Data from the national heart study,
http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-170639.pdf (3) that Brazil uses whole-cell pertussis to vaccinate the poor (who cannot afford the fee for the clinic), source: Dr. Waldely De Oliveira Dias pers comm to Dr. Lyons-Weiler). Add to that the new use of folic acid w/no MTHFR screening, and the larvicide, and expansion of the use of glyphosate in Brazil – a perfect storm.
Go read the bulletin from the WHO which was written before that knew they needed a new boogeyman for the year 2016.