Zika House of Cards

More revelations on the Zika House of Cards:


A comment given by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler on The Vaccine Reaction:

James Lyons-Weiler
Reply
July 1, 2016 at 12:39 am

I have it on good authority that (1) Microcephaly surge started in Brazil before Zika arrived; (2) the surge started a year after the mandated “Stork” pre-natal program (Data from the national heart study, http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-170639.pdf (3) that Brazil uses whole-cell pertussis to vaccinate the poor (who cannot afford the fee for the clinic), source: Dr. Waldely De Oliveira Dias pers comm to Dr. Lyons-Weiler). Add to that the new use of folic acid w/no MTHFR screening, and the larvicide, and expansion of the use of glyphosate in Brazil – a perfect storm.

From the report:
Microcephaly in northeastern Brazil: a review of 16,208 births between 2012 and 2015.

From Abstract:
A recent outbreak of microcephaly has been reported from Northeast Brazil. Neither its aetiology, nor its clinical significance has yet been fully established. A complication from an intrauterine infection with the Zika virus (ZIKV) is, thus far, the most explored hypothesis. In Paraíba, one of the nine States within the epicentre of the epidemic, 21 medical centres collaborate, via telemedicine since 2012, in a paediatric cardiology network. The Network’s database currently stores in formation on more than 100,000 neonates.
.
.
Introduction:
Microcephaly is a clinical finding and not a disease. It is defined as an occipital-frontal head circumference (OFC) smaller than expected for gestational age and gender.
.
.
Methodology:
This is a descriptive, observational and transverse study, with data from the Círculo do Coração – Paediatric Cardiology and Perinatology Network (RCP-CirCor) Database from Paraíba, in Northeast Brazil.
.
.
Microcephaly criteria utilized:
In this study, classification of microcephaly was based on three different criteria, as follows:
1. Brazilian Health Ministry proposed criteria, where microcephaly equals an OFC smaller than 32 cm for term neonates.(6)
2. Fenton curves, where microcephaly equals an OFC less than -3 standard deviation (SD) for age and gender.(7)
3. Proportionality criteria, where microcephaly equals an OFC less than ((height/2) + 10) ± 2.(8)
.
.
Statistical analysis:
The software R were used for data analysis, which included Friedman as the statistical model for hypothesis determination with the confidence interval of 95%.

Results:
Between Dec 1st and 31st 2015, OFC was collected from 16,208 neonates, born between January 1st 2012 and December 31st 2015, in
21 different public health centres from Paraíba. There was an even distribution of gender, most of them were term babies, weighting over 3,000g and measuring over 45cm at birth. Table 1 describes the population.
.
.
Temporal distribution :
The distribution of cases of microcephaly between 2012 and 2015 is observed in Fig. 1. A temporal oscillation is observed which is concordant in all three criteria. The numbers are greater than expected since the end of 2012 and with its sharpest peak in mid-2014. However when only the extreme cases of microcephaly are considered a significant (p=0.001) increase in numbers is observed in recent months as shown on Figure 2.

.
.
Discussion: (in the body of the discussion)
The first question to be addressed is the real incidence of microcephaly in Northeast Brazil. The discrepancy from the expected and found cases may reflect the condition’s major sub-notification in the official sites in recent years coupled with an even greater
epidemiological crisis than presumed or simple the need to revise the diagnostic criteria for the condition. The numbers of very extreme cases of microcephaly, for instance, while significantly increasing over the last few months, are much smaller and until recently fell within the expected ranges for the worldwide reported incidence.
.
.
(I think this is the most reveling information to date and Jon Called it with the wording of the various press releases)
Currently, the association with the ZIKV infection is the most explored possibility. Evidence of perinatal transmission of ZIKV(10)together with its strong neurotropism(11) and its documentation in amniotic fluid of foetuses with microcephaly(4) are factors that favour this hypothesis.

However, if the ZIKV were indeed introduced in Brazil at the World Cup in mid 2014(12), the outbreak of microcephaly would have preceded it. ZIKV has been identified in Africa over 50 years ago, and neither there nor in the outbreaks outside Africa, such an association with microcephaly has been reported(13). However, recently ZIKV has been associated to a number of conditions including Guillain-Barrè syndrome during a recent outbreak of the infection in the French Polynesia(10).

Read the entire report at the link above.

Here is another bit of information:
Neurology SEPT 15, 2009 (NOTE THE DATE)
“Microcephaly may result from any insult that disturbs early brain growth…Annually, approximately 25,000 infants in the United States will be diagnosed with microcephaly…”
CAUSES:
#1. toxic pesticide,
#2. toxic substance injected into the mother—
….(a street drug or a vaccine).
#3. malnutrition of the mother
#4. A physical blow. Tweet