shooting fakery

I am now going to dig in and state with clarity blanks were used

James wrote:

I watched the alison parker video ... take it from someone (me) who knows about guns ... the shooter had used the gun before with real bullets ... watch as the gun learches FORWARD with each round ... these are blanks ... the shooter is bracing for the inevitable backwards impulse as the gun would release a real bullet ... BUT there is no real bullet so the gun lurches forward with each round because the shooter is reacting to what his instinct would say would be a real round ... but since there is no real round the gun thrusts forward ... watch the video again ... jim

My response: Ok, now I will say this: There is too much smoke and too much fire at the end of the barrel, which proves blanks. To the left here is the frame that proves this is blanks being fired, there is simply TOO MUCH FIRE at the end of the barrel and the color of the flame is totally wrong for real bullets, that is the color of flame from blanks, which is similar to the flame from black powder:

No camera shake also proves blanks.

DURING DAYLIGHT, IT IS USUALLY DIFFICULT TO SEE MUZZLE FLASH FROM REAL BULLETS USING MODERN SMOKELESS POWDER, AND THAT IS ALL THERE IS NOWADAYS. However, muzzle flash from blanks shows up clearly, and this is what we see here to the left. OOOH, SCARY LOOKING, but IT PROVES BLANKS, as does the excessive smoke which I have NEVER seen from any real round I have fired and I have shot thousands and thousands and thousands of rounds and I mean freaking THOUSANDS with hand guns, shot guns, rifles, you name it I have owned it, I have never seen smoke with modern (and I am talking past 50 years) bullets and always see it with blanks which I have also shot. WHAT SMOKES? OLD SCHOOL BLACK POWDER.

This is the difference between blanks, which have to use black powder or something similar because it will explode with no back pressure provided by a bullet. Modern smokeless powder will not go off properly or at all without a bullet providing back pressure to cause it to explode. Black powder will explode without any back pressure, but modern smokeless powder will not. That is why smoky black powder is used in blanks And the gun lurching forward is from vacuum pressure from the gases leaving the barrel and making a forward pulling pressure which a bullet would normally cancel out with a kick. Blanks get weapons dirty quick. It is not the same quality material with blanks. Blanks smoke a lot.

A little correction to the above, when I said "you name it, I have owned it" I mean rifles/shotgun/handgun semi/auto bolt, pump, etc. not every gun made. Never had a single shot, everything I ever bought was intended for more than casual use. Assortment of scopes . . . . believe it or not, I did not like Leupold, my favorite was a cheap Bushnell. It ended up being real bright, real clear, and very accurate. Never had a tritium scope or laser scope (gimmicks). From what I have seen, what makes a good scope is a great stable mount and a huge front objective.

BADA BING!!!

Hi Jim i down loaded the shooting video of the reporter opened it in photoshop and made the resolution much better then I could skip through the video .02 of a second each click at around 18 seconds the reporter looks at the gun man to check that everything is in place. Also at that time the man doing the video for the news channel is filming over the balcony so it wouldn't show her looking at the gun man. I also noticed the gun man fires 2 shots and the camera man doesn't even flinch just to make sure he has a good video shot of the reporter being shot.This is defo a fake. keep up with the good work.

all the best from Greg in the UK.

My response: Good work. Definite fake. What can I say? HMM, PERHAPS THIS: True, the news reporter might focus on the subject completely but what about the subject? Sure you could not see the subject clearly in the shooter video, his phone or whatever he used was blocked by the cameraman from getting her on video BUT THE GUN WAS WAY OUT FRONT, AND WOULD HAVE BEEN PERFECTLY CLEARLY VISIBLE BY THE WOMAN BEING INTERVIEWED. You can't tell me she would not have noticed, DING DING DING, another shovel of B.S. thrown down the manure chute.

 

ANOTHER grand slam!

Two takes for Virgia reporter cameraman shooting. Broadcast version shown on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecq5ReMezEQ has interviewee saying this up to shot point (****):

"We’re seeing tourism. We want the people that come here to stay, that would****". Takes about 4.2 seconds and cameraman seems to go down first.

Gunman's footage records this, which is delivered in about 3.3 seconds and reporter is being shot first:

"We’re seeing tourism. We want people to come here to stay, what we would****

Even after Charlie Hebdo, people still don't bother to analyse the audio!

NT1

My response: SAVE THOSE VIDEOS AT KEEPVID.COM. That alone is proof this never happened.

 

MORE:

A good point:

Forgive me for sounding trite, but, this latest shooting seems like an easy one...

The "shooting" of reporters "live" on air, and then recorded AND uploaded to the web was all scripted and done for one MAIN reason (other than the standard by now 'eww, guns are evil' bullshit...)

To send a message to the Presstitutes that they have been getting a little lax at selling THE AGENDA to the sheep and a few of them have actually dared questioning THE AGENDA and to remind them how easily they can be replaced and to fall back in line with THE AGENDA.

After I watched around 20 different news story versions covering this story yesterday and last night, you can just smell the fear thru the TV coming from these reporters. From Local news to BBC/ABC/NBC level, they are ALL scared and have been successfully reminded of who their masters are.

~ Kerr

OUCH! another DING DING DING! The news camera mans footage shows a dark african american man with a beard. But if you saw any pictures of Bryce Williams he never fashioned a beard. I saw his twitter account on the wayback machine (which has now been updated and only shows a suspended page). and anyway he had no beard in any recent photos. Hey Jim, What do you think that "shot" reporter was wearing on her left leg just bellow the knee? Fake blood pack which was supposed to burst but didn't?

 

jimstone.is

Tweet