Re: at Browns Ferry Nuclear Facility

well, i was very near the joplin tornado that lifted the hospital up and turned it on its foundation, lifted the basements of homes right out of the ground and threw cars and piled them up like they were leaves and THAT thing had to be controlled. so was the one in greensburg kansas. both did the maximum damage they could have with precision that is hard to ignore.the only thing i can think of to refute that would be that the cities are attracting the funnels with their extra heat. i heard once that was why trailer parks tend to get hit is because they are reflecting a ton of heat which fuels the vortex. but with the ton of bullshit i have been fed every day of my life i cant trust any of it any more. i quit sweating the small stuff a long time ago.

back to the subject, if they did it there they have done it all over. what an awesome weapon to control, an F5 tornado. in fact some wanted to call the joplin tornado an F7. it broke the wind speed gauge on top of the hospital it lifted up and it broke at 315mph. the mammatus cloud formations over me just 6 miles north were stunning. we stood in my dads front yard and listened to it. it was like a constant thunder overhead. no vibrato or staccato, just constant thunder right over head. we had no idea then we were listening to a tornado 6 or 7 miles away.

i posted one of the best exposes ofweather manipulation i have seen regarding the storms in the pacific and haarp. some of these guys, like dutch, just shoot from the hip and make something out of nothing. dutch would have shit a brick back in 03 with that X-40 or 50 or whatever flare we had. i think that event made them take everything off line and recalibrate. i dont think we are mixing apples with apples. the M class flares seem to have the same impacts as X flares used to and all the X flares we have seen have been in the 1s mostly. IOW, i think the X scale today is actually a scale above the old X scale. never tell the truth. never spook the herd.