CureZone   Log On   Join   Happy New Year 2025
What random accidents are incapable of accomplishing.
 
Mighty.Sun.Tzu Views: 1,390
Published: 11 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,155,542

What random accidents are incapable of accomplishing.


What i see is that evolution believers get distracted by such things as similarities between different types of life, genetic research notwithstanding, and assume that this equates to different life forms all having "evolved" from the same life source, rather than believing that an intelligent designer would employ common inventions as parts within each of his inventions, just as is true with different types of automobiles, aircraft, buildings and such.

A simplistic and admittedly imperfect analogy would be like looking at a tent, a house and the empire state building, comparing the three and concluding something like, "well obviously the tent must have been around first and the tree split, one branch eventually evolving into a house while another branch remained tents... and the house eventually branched off, one branch evolving into very tall buildings, another branch evolving into stadiums, another branch remaining unchanged houses, etc."... "The tall building therefore is much more closely related genetically speaking to the house than it is to it's more distant ancestor the tent".

Using what the courtroom would call circumstantial evidence and drawing unobserved speculatory conclusions from it is i feel first of all very weak and sloppy science, indeed quite unscientific... and I feel it is a huge distraction from the obviousness of knowing that MILLIONS OF RANDOM FREAK MUTATIONS can not possibly invent and design extraordinarily intricate and sophisticated blueprints for life, nano machines, nano factories, nano repair facilities, self replicating cells that are each more complex than New York City, 4 chamber hearts, brains, etc, especially when we consider that these mutations are demonstrated through REAL Science to ALMOST NEVER BE GOOD.

It is akin to setting off a million explosions in a junk yard and believing that something a trillion times more complex than the space shuttle would emerge from the chaos.

In the same way we can look at "michelle loves michael" written in the sand or see a simple structure, many trillions of times simpler than the simplest machine of life... like say a hut... and know beyond any doubt whatsoever that this did not occur randomly. The complexity of life which is unspeakably more sophisticated by comparison requires a designer with an extraordinarily fantastical intellect, but the iQ of random mutations is ZERO.

If you one day decided that we were indeed intelligently designed, would you be much more inclined (as richard dawkins would) to believe that aliens invented and designed the intricate machines of life than to believe that there is a creator of the universe (God) that did it?

This discussion with the evolution believer is not about proving exactly who invented and designed life and all of it's spectacular components in all of their extraordinary complexity, it's just about acknowledging that random mutations with zero ability to imagine, think and plan can not possibly have done it... and moving on from there in the search for truth using REAL Science as well as basic common sense.
 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.094 sec, (2)