Re: Ed Dames - Kill Shot (2012)

With all due respect, WIEL, I could not bear to listen to half of this guy's hyper-critical babble BS.

Certainly, I am of the opinion that Ed Dames is a conditioned military man, who has admittedly refused to look into matters concerning who was behind the 911 attacks. I sense, for the simple reason that this would, no doubt, throw a monkey wrench into his conditioned-reflex-defense mechanism that would shatter his ideology of his own beloved care-taker government. One of his tasks was to find the precise location of Col Gaddafi, so an assassination attempt could be made to take him out, as he was a believer in the MSM rhetoric/propaganda that the dictator was killing his own people en masse (total fabrication, imo).

The idea that the phrase "going postal" refers to the ex-military personnel that the Post Office had the habit of hiring is total BS. In disagreement to Dietrich, I would tend to agree with what wikipedia has to say, over Dietrich's opinion, about how this phrase came into being (as I also use to work for the P.O. back in the day): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_postal

This Douglas Dietrich has dropped a few names in which one could spend a few hours running down each of those rabbit holes to check on.

For one, he worked for US Army Colonel Michael Aquino. Aquino was deeply involved in MK Ultra projects in the 60's and 70's, until finally being tossed out of the military in 1975. He went on to form the "Temple of Set" along with members of "The Church of Satan".
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/satanic_subversion.htm

In the short of it, I have found some rabbit trails that have led to people that have critiqued Douglas Dietrich in the same manner he has chosen to critique Ed Dames. John Lear is one such person:

John Lear accuses Douglas Dietrich of being Naval Disinformation agent.

John wrote: "I listened to a couple of hours of Dietrich and he seems to be a Navy disinfo agent. He mixes up the Tonopah Test Range with Area 51. His story about the flag on the Missouri at the end of WW2 is incorrect and his story about a Japanese dirigible/Blimp over Los Angeles in 1942 is impossible." http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo.../reply31252162

Dietrich's response...


Jeff Rense has written an article that says that remote viewing community has had a rough time as it broke down into many different factions, depending on the mode & methods that are used. But in 2007, the community had somewhat made amends and, especially with the greater acceptance of Courtney Brown (a Phd-er, as opposed to a military trained man), all factions are, more or less, allowing each other to operate & co-esist without one faction criticizing any of the others. http://rense.com/general82/stag.htm

The reason for me posting the Ed Dames is because of the remote viewing predictions that he has come out with, it appears to me to be somewhat congruent with researchers such as Courtney Brown's 2013 Global Coastal Event. http://www.viewzone.com/rv2013.html

With the recent rise of the North Korean nuclear explosion threat/event, something that Ed Dames has predicted from his remote viewing sessions, as being the precursor to an event that both Courtney Brown & Ed Dames (Kill Shot) has said will occur predominantly in the Southern hemisphere.



We don't have very long to wait for that one.

best regards...
turiya


Tweet