Analysis: Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife

Cannabis can lower the IQ of young teenagers and may cause permanent mental impairment, research has shown.

[How was the cannabis administered? Was there a control group that used raw cannabis? Or vapourization? What kind of cannabis was used? Were toxic pesticides used on the cannabis? Were artificial petrochemical fertilizers used?]

The most persistent users suffer an average eight-point decline in IQ between adolescence and adulthood, according to the study of more than 1,000 participants.

Scientists believe smoking cannabis from the age of puberty may disrupt developing and vulnerable brain circuits. Users experienced significantly more attention and memory problems than non-users, the study revealed. This was the case even after taking account of different educational backgrounds and use of alcohol and other drugs.

[What about  other factors such as amalgam fillings or dietary factors, such as the subjects intact of EFA's? Hemp seed oil in particular, did any of the subjects consume hemp in other forms?]

Quitting or cutting down on cannabis later in life did not fully reverse the impact on those who started taking the drug in their early teens. But the study found no evidence of similar problems affecting people who only took up cannabis as adults.

[Quitting or cutting down for how long? Were there any dietary changes made? If the early teen users didn't improve their IQ, Did the adult users IQ improve when they quit?]

The international team, led by US psychologist Dr Madeline Meier, from Duke University in Durham, Carolina, wrote in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: "Persistent cannabis use was associated with neuropsychological decline broadly across domains of functioning even after controlling for years of education.

"Impairment was concentrated among adolescent-onset cannabis users, with more persistent use associated with greater decline. Further, cessation of cannabis use did not fully restore neuropsychological functioning among adolescent-onset cannabis users."

Professor Terrie Moffitt, from the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, who took part in the study, said: "Participants were frank about their substance abuse habits because they trust our confidentiality guarantee, and 96% of the original participants stuck with the study from 1972 to today. It's such a special study that I'm fairly confident that cannabis is safe for over-18 brains, but risky for under-18 brains."

Colleague Professor Robin Murray, also from the Institute of Psychiatry, said: "We have known for some time that heavy use of cannabis increases risk of schizophrenia-like psychoses but this remains a relatively rare outcome so it's not so important from a public health point of view.

"There are far fewer studies on its effect on minor psychiatric illness or on everyday life. However, there are a lot of clinical and educational anecdotal reports that cannabis users tend to be less successful in their educational achievement, marriages and occupations.

[This is all relative perhaps cannabis users are smart enough to know that "educational achievements" lack meaning.

Perhaps marriages are less successful because of the built in societal mechanism of propagandized misconceptions of cannabis or illegal status of cannabis use.

The same could be said for occupation.

Perhaps cannabis users are not perceived as being "successful" because they care more about just living life or more diverse endevours as opposed to a mono-track occupation. Beware of those who measure their success in terms of dollar amounts.]

"It is of course part of folk-lore among young people that some heavy users of cannabis - my daughter callers them 'stoners' - seem to gradually lose their abilities and end up achieving much less than one would have anticipated. This study provides one explanation as to why this might be the case."

Achievements are all relative. Perhaps canabis users just don't like making achievements on the backs of others.

THE STUDY
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/08/22/1206820109.abstract

Regarding the Testing.

All "hard drugs" are lumped into one category.