CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Mercury still in me?, tests are unreliable
 
indigoaura Views: 1,043
Published: 12 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,925,329

Re: Mercury still in me?, tests are unreliable


I've had 4 Amalgams for more than 20 years and never had a problem until they started chipping and decaying. The tooth actually decays UNDER the filling as well.

We have so much exposure to heavy metals these days in our air, water, and food, so even if someone doesn't have Amalgams they are still testing toxic for heavy metals.

I think alot of research then frequent low-dose chelation with supporting supps is probably due for everyone on a maintenance level.

I would never consider anything other than Cutler protocol if you suspect you're mercury toxic. You can really hose yourself by loosening the mercury and risking it settling in more damaging parts of your body (loosening from liver and settling in brain for example).

Also if you wanted a test as proof, you can't rely on heavy metal tests for mercury. You do a mineral test to gauge it, look up the "counting rules."

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

1.531 sec, (1)