Re: Vaccine-Induced Tumors In Cats

The true scope of the problem may be much larger.  I have seen it estimated that almost 150,000 tumors in cats are reported each year at the injection site of vaccines and, as most of us know, adverse reactions to vaccines are grossly underestimated (by most estimates only 1 in 10 are reported and by some estimates as few as 1 in 100).  Since tumors may develop years down the road, how many are reported and how many of those are reported as a tumor at an injection site?

I note that the author of the article is a veterinary oncologist who recommends continuing to give vaccinations to cats, and if they do get cancer then choose the favorite failed paridigm of mainstream oncology - try to cut out, burn out or poison out the tumor.

From an article today at Natural News:

 In her article, for example, Miller actually suggests that cat owners continue to get their cats vaccinated with whatever vaccines their veterinarians recommend because "[t]he risk of developing a tumor from a vaccine may be much less than your cat catching a deadly virus that could have been prevented with a vaccine," in her opinion. And if your cat does get cancer, Miller, of course, recommends surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy as appropriate treatment.

However, according to Dr. Don Hamilton, a veterinary homeopath in New Mexico, most pet vaccines are largely useless anyway because they cause "at least as much illness as they have ever prevented." In many cases, he says, vaccines simply do not offer the protection their advocates claim they do, and they typically weaken pets' immune systems and create more chronic illness than if those pets were allowed to simply develop their own natural immunity through proper nutrition (http://www.holisticat.com/vaccinations.html).

http://www.naturalnews.com/035080_vaccines_cancer_pets.html