Opinion versus fact and trying to defend the indefensible

And what exactly is there in my post that is fiction?  I submit that what I posted was not mere opinion, but demonstrable fact.

During your time of "lurking", did you happen to catch the WM's post in Hv's forum where he explained the truth about who banned Hv and why?

How do you, or anyone else, rationally explain why I am banned from no public or debate forums and Hv has been banned from more forums and had more complaints than anyone in the history of CZ?  Speaking of fiction, surely you don't buy into the fiction that it is because of some conspiracy against him or because other moderators did not like his "truth".  Because the fact and not the fiction is that it has been because of his wrong behavior.

Regardless of your opinion of me or what has happened otherwise, do you support Hv for posting a threat to sue the WM?  THAT is what started this debate to begin with, you realize. I and others you and Hv call the usual suspects or Troll Pack or whatever, committed the cardinal sin of coming to the defense of the WM and objecting to the threat against him.  As a result, we are seeing the usual Hv tactic by he and supporters of trying to make the WM's defenders the issue instead of what he did in the first place.

Have you ever seen Hv support the WM or come to his defense?  If you have lurked well enough, you know that just the opposite has happened.  He has in fact called out the WM and attacked him numerous times - most often in a forum he was given solely by the grace of the WM.  Have you seen me or the other "usual suspects" ever call out, attack or threaten the WM?  How about his personal attacks on other members in his private forum?  Does that get your approval too? How about his latest distorted and delusional post (OK, that is opinion, but I think it is an apt one) made just moments ago? And giving himself an RRR rating yet:

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1867537#i

And, finally, how about that lovely message he sent to Luella?