Re: 29,412 cubic inches of stones.

 Face it fecal man you really exposed your ignorance when you made the m*o*o*nic statement of 49 inches of flat stones too express volume , no amount of cut and paste or throwing tantrums will ever let you live that down. 

I did not say they were flat.  I said according to the other poster's statement the only way that 49 inches of "stones" could fit in the gallbladder is if they were flat.  Since you cannot even get that part right that calls the rest of your post in to question.  I did calculate the volume, which by the way is not the same as area that would be measured by a flat surface.  So you have that wrong as well.  And as pointed out they are not spheres either so you have that wrong as well.  Maybe you should spend less time trying to attack and spend more time learning to comprehend what you are reading and about the difference between area and volume so you don't make yourself look so foolish.